Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resin Cements: Factors Affecting Clinical Performance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Practical Clinical Guide to Resin Cements

Abstract

This chapter discusses in detail the factors that may affect the clinical performance of resin cements. As this class of cements is more complex than the older conventional cements, several factors affect its performance in the mouth including the strength of the restoration material, manipulation of the resin cement, polymerization, and adhesives among others. The different types of dental ceramics and laboratory composites as pretreatments are somewhat dictated by the type of ceramic or composite used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alex G (2008) Preparing porcelain surfaces for optimal bonding. Funct Esthet Restor Dent 1:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos T, Eliades G, Palaghias G (1993) Composition, reactivity and surface interactions of three dental silane primers. Dent Mater 9:182–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blatz MK, Kern M (2003) Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 89:268–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Borges GA, Agarwal P, Miranzi BAS et al (2008) Influence of different ceramics on resin cement Knoop hardness number. Oper Dent 33:622–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calamia JR, Simonsen RJ (1985) Effects of coupling agents on bond strength of etched porcelain (Abstract). J Dent Res 64:296 (Special issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho RM, Garcia FC, de Silva SM et al (2005) Adhesive-composite incompatibility, part II. J Esthet Restor Dent 17:191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Cekic-Nagas I, Canay S, Sahin E (2010) Bonding of resin core materials to lithium disilicate ceramics: the effect of resin film thickness. Int J Prosthodont 23:469–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M (1998) Effect of etchant, etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent 23:250–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun LZ, White SN (1999) Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 81:597–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusayama T, Ide K, Hosada H (1964) Relief of resistance of cement of full cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 14:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn HR (1983) Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etch enamel. Dent Clin North Am 27:671–684

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain MA, Bradford EW, Charlton G (1979) Effect of etching on the strength of aluminous porcelain jacket crowns. BDJ 147:89–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Condon JR (1998) In vitro aging of dental composites in water – effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 42:465–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida H (1985) Structural gradient in the silane-coupling agent layers and its influence on the mechanical and physical properties of composites. Plenum Press, New York, pp 25–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Jivraj SA, Kim TH, Donovan T (2006) Selection of luting agents part 1. CDA Journal 34(2): 149–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kern M, Barloi A, Yang B (2009) Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 88:817–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kern M, Thompson VP (1994) Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 71:453–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kern M, Thompson VP (1995) Bonding to glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 73:240–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kern M, Wegner SM (1998) Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 14:64–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kildal KK, Ruyter JE (1994) How different curing methods affect the degree of conversion of resin based inlay/onlay materials. Acta Odontologica Scand 152(5):315–322

    Google Scholar 

  • King NM, Tay FR, Pashley DH et al (2005) Conversion o one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent 18:126–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R et al (2010) Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 26:426–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levine WA (1989) An evaluation of the film thickness of resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 62:175–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Llie N, Hickel R (2008) Correlation between ceramics translucency and polymerization efficiency through ceramic. Dent Mater 24:208–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Manso AP, Silva NR, Bonfante EA et al (2011) Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Clin N Am 55:311–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinlinna JP, Lassila LV, Ozcan M et al (2004) An introduction to silanes and their clinical applications in dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 17:155–164

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe JF, Walls AW (2008) Applied dental materials, 9th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 274–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandini S (2010) Indirect resin composites J Conserv Dent (serial online) (cited 2013 January 7);13:184–194. Available from: http://www.jcd.org.in/text.asp?2010/13/4/184/73377

  • Oyague RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M et al (2009) Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pretreated sintered zirconium oxide ceramics. Dent Mater 25:392–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oysaed H, Ruyter IE (1986) Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 20:261–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan M, Vallitu PK (2003) Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 19:725–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pazin MC, Moraes RR, Goncalves LS et al (2008) Effects of ceramic thickness and curing light on light transmission through leucite-reinforce material and polymerization of dual-cured luting agent. J Oral Sci 50:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson GJ, Longman CM (1989) Water sorption and solubility of resin-based materials following inadequate polymerization by a visible-light curing system. J Oral Rehabil 16:57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pegoraro TA, Da Silva NR, Carvalho RM (2007) Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 51:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers JM, Farah JW, O’Keefe KL et al (2013) Guide to all-ceramic bonding. Available from: http://www.Kuraraydental.com/guides/-item/guide-to-all-ceramic-bonding. Accessed 31 July 2013

  • Sanares AM, Itthagarun A, King NM et al (2001) Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 17:542–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG, Belser UC et al (1994) Dent Mater 10:172–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon JF, Darnell LA (2012) Consideration for proper selection of dental cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent 33:28–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soares CJ, Soares PV, Pereira JC, Fonesca RB (2005) Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory processed composite restorations. A literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 17:24–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ et al (1991) Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 4:17–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suliman AH, Swift EJ Jr, Perdiago J (1993) Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 70:118–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka R, Fujishima A, Shibata Y et al (2008) Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on zirconia. J Dent Res 87:666–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI et al (2002) Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 30:371–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tay FR, Bl S, Pashley DH et al (2003) Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 5:91–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valandro LF, Della Bona A, Antonio Bottino M et al (2005) The effect of ceramic surface treatment on bonding to densely sintered alumina ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 93:253–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Varjão FM, Segalla JCM, Beloti AM et al (2002) Study on film thickness of four resin cements. Rev Odontol UNESP São Paulo 31:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Vohra F, Al-Rifaiy M, Al Aqhtani M (2013) Factors affecting resin polymerization of bonded all ceramic restorations. Review of literature. J Dow Uni Health Sci Karachi 7:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner SM, Kern M (2000) Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2:139–147

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z et al (1995) Effect of dynamic loading methods on cement film thickness in vitro. J Prosthodont 4(4):252–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yun JY, Ha SR, Lee JB et al (2010) Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater 26:650–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Lawn BR, Rekow ED et al (2004) Effect of sandblasting on the long term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 71:381–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of the Philippines Manila College of Dentistry, Paranaque, Philippines

    Michelle Sunico-Segarra & Armin Segarra

Authors
  1. Michelle Sunico-Segarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Armin Segarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sunico-Segarra, M., Segarra, A. (2015). Resin Cements: Factors Affecting Clinical Performance. In: A Practical Clinical Guide to Resin Cements. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43842-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43842-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43841-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43842-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation