Skip to main content

Who Is the Favored Bride? Challenges in Switching to a Multi-vendor Offshoring Strategy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Systems Outsourcing

Part of the book series: Progress in IS ((PROIS))

Abstract

This chapter explores the governance benefits and challenges that arise when a client firm switches from a single- to a multi-vendor offshoring strategy. It also looks at the management tactics that firms use for dealing with the arising challenges. To do so, we examine the case of a global corporation, which recently took the decision to onboard two additional offshore vendors after having worked exclusively with an Indian IT vendor for more than a decade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Brooks (1975) for a formula to calculate the number of communication channels that will be generated.

References

  • Babar, M. A., Verner, J. M., & Nguyen, P. T. (2007). Establishing and maintaining trust in software outsourcing relationships: An empirical investigation. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(9), 1438–1449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). From vendors to partners: Information technology and incomplete contracts in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Organizational Computing, 3(3), 301–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bapna, R., Barua, A., Mani, D., & Mehra, A. (2010). Cooperation, coordination, and governance in multisourcing: An agenda for analytical and empirical research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 785–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, S., Gupta, A., & Hasija, S. (2012). Single sourcing versus multisourcing: The role of effort interdependence, metric-outcome misalignment, and incentive design. INSEAD Faculty and Research Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, F. P. (1975). The mythical man-month. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, E., & Agarwal, R. (2002). The maturation of offshore sourcing of information technology work. MIS Quarterly Executive, 1(2), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, E., & Tjia, P. (2005). Offshoring information technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, T. Y., & Krause, D. R. (2006). The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 637–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 291–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Young, A. (2006). Multisourcing: moving beyond outsourcing to achieve growth and agility. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2006). Get the big picture: Outsourcing IT infrastructure, and finding your ‘guardian vendor’. In Deloitte CIO Club, Winter 2005/2006. London, UK: Deloitte & Touche LLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern, J., Winkler, J., & Heinzl, A. (2008). Explaining variations in client extra costs between software projects offshored to India. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 333–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1992). Emergence versus forcing: basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goo, J., Kishore, R., Rao, H. R., & Nam, K. (2009). The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 119–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R., Krishna, S., Nicholson, B., & Sahay, S. (2001). Synching or sinking: Global software outsourcing relationships. IEEE Software, 18(2), 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmström Olsson, H., O Conchuir, E., Ã…gerfalk, P. J., & Fitzgerald, B. (2008). Two-stage offshoring: An investigation of the Irish bridge. MIS Quarterly, 32(2), 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, P. P., Fonstad, N. O., & Beath, C. M. (2008). Technology service inter-organizational relationships: An agenda for information technology service sourcing research. In S. Cropper, C. Huxham, M. Ebers, & P. S. Ring (Eds.), The oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, H., & Trauth, E. M. (2007). Cultural influences and globally distributed information systems development: experiences from Chinese IT professionals. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research: The Global Information Technology Workforce (pp. 36–45). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou, C. L., Thompson, R. L., & Smith, H. J. (2009). Selective status reporting in information systems projects: A dyadic-level investigation. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 785–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, M., Im, G. P., & Mähring, M. (2007). Reporting bad news on software projects: The effects of culturally constituted views of face-saving. Information Systems Journal, 17(1), 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, L. J. (2004). Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Information Systems Research, 15(4), 374–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M. C., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: Lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 363–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J.-N. (2008). Exploring the vendor’s process model in information technology outsourcing. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 569–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levina, N., & Ross, J. W. (2003). From the vendor’s perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 331–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levina, N., & Su, N. (2008). Global multisourcing strategy: The emergence of a supplier portfolio in services offshoring. Decision Sciences, 39(3), 541–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahnke, V., Wareham, J., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2008). Offshore middlemen: Transnational intermediation in technology sourcing. Journal of Information Technology, 23(1), 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mani, D., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2011). An empirical analysis of the contractual and information structures of business process outsourcing relationships. Information Systems Research, 23(3), 618–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagle, A., & Maughan, A. (2008). Single and multi-sourcing models. In Practical Law Company (PLC), Cross-border outsourcing handbook 2007/2008. http://www.practicallaw.com/8-380-6567.

  • Poppo, L., & Zenger, T. (2002). Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management Journal, 23(8), 707–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., Maruping, L. M., & Venkatesh, V. (2009). Offshore information systems project success: The role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quarterly, 33(3), 617–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J., & Roumasset, J. (1995). Sole sourcing, competitive sourcing, parallel sourcing: Mechanisms for supplier performance. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16(1), 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, A. P., Keil, M., & Wallace, L. (2007). The effects of optimistic and pessimistic biasing on software project status reporting. Information and Management, 44(2), 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, B. C. Y., Smith, H. J., Keil, M., & Montealegre, R. (2003). Reporting bad news about software projects: Impact of organizational climate and information asymmetry in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(1), 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: social science bases of administrative theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltri, N., & Saunders, C. S. (2006). Antecedents of information systems backsourcing. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information systems outsourcing (2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Wiener .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wiener, M., Saunders, C.S. (2014). Who Is the Favored Bride? Challenges in Switching to a Multi-vendor Offshoring Strategy. In: Hirschheim, R., Heinzl, A., Dibbern, J. (eds) Information Systems Outsourcing. Progress in IS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43820-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics