A Novel Concept for the Usage of Mobile Information Services

  • Bernd Heinrich
  • Lars Lewerenz
Part of the book series (XPERT.PRESS)


Marketplaces for mobile apps have shown a tremendous growth in the recent years leading to a variety of mobile apps/services. One type of widely applied mobile service are mobile information services, which when being enriched with context information (e.g., GPS Position) can be used to facilitate a user with information mostly tailored to his/her current activities (e.g., planning a day tour in a city unkonwn to the user). In an evolving information service market more, and more information (e.g., restaurants listed in the information service Yelp)—which we denote as information or service objects—is provided to the user. As a result, situations repeatedly occur where the user needs assistance in selecting various service objects for the activities envisaged, as being confronted with an information overload problem. This is even more relevant when considering larger sequences of activities. Here, context interdependencies, which are dependencies that exist between different activities with respect to the usefulness and feasibility of the service objects, need to be considered. Hence, in this paper, we present a novel concept for the usage of mobile information services that takes context interdependencies into account. In that way, we aim to support the decision making of the user. To show the practical benefits of this concept we developed a prototypical implementation.


  1. 1.
    Damián-Reyes, P., Favela, J., & Contreras-Castillo, J. (2011). Uncertainty management in context-aware applications: Increasing usability and user trust. Wireless Personal Communications: An International Journal, 56(1),37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dannewitz, C., Pentikousis, K., Rembarz, R., Renault, É., Strandberg, O., & Ubillos, J. (2008). Scenarios and research issues for a network of information. In European Alliance for Innovation (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2008, International Mobile Multimedia Communications Conference, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujii, K., & Suda, T. (2009). Semantics-based context-aware dynamic service composition. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 4(2), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gartner. (2013). Gartner says mobile app stores will see annual downloads reach 102 billion in 2013. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
  5. 5.
    Gerpott, T. J., & Berg, S. (2011). Determinants of the Willingness to Use Mobile Location-Based Services. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 5, 279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldmedia. (2014). Location-based Services Monitor 2014. Angebote, Nutzung und lokale Werbemarktpotenziale ortsbezogener, mobiler Dienste in Deutschland.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heinrich, B., Zellner, G., & Leist, S. (2011) Service integrators in business networks—the importance of relationship values. Electronic Markets, 21(4), 215–235.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hinkelmann, K., Maise, M., & Thönssen, B. (2013). Connecting enterprise architecture and information objects using an enterprise ontology. In A. Gerber & P. V. Deventer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013, International Conference on Enterprise Systems, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirsch-Pinhero, M., Yves, V., & Yolande, B. (2008). Context-aware service selection using graph matching. In F. De Paoli, I. Toma, A. Maurino, M. Tilly, G. Dobson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2008, Workshop on Non Functional Properties and Service Level, Bd. 411.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, D., & Ishida, T. (2012). Dynamic service selection based on context-aware QoS. In L. Moser, M. Parashar, P. Hung (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2012, IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 641–648.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Linnhoff-Popien, C., & Verclas, S. (2012) Mit Business-Apps ins Zeitalter mobiler Geschäftsprozesse. In S. Verclas & C. Linnhoff-Popien (Eds.), Smart Mobile Apps. Mit Business-Apps ins Zeitalter mobiler Geschäftsprozesse (pp. 3–19). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martin, C. (2013). Mobile influence: The new power of the consumer (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Research2guidance. (2014). mHealth App developer economics 2014. The state of the art of mHealth App publishing.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Statista. (2014). Deutsche zeigen kaum Interesse an neuen Apps. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
  15. 15.
    Statista. (2014). Worldwide revenue of App stores from 2008 to 2014. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
  16. 16.
    The Boston Consulting Group. (2014). Travel goes mobile.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vanrompay, Y., Kirsch-Pinhero, M., Yolande, B. (2009). Context-aware service selection with uncertain context information. In R. Rouvoy & M. Wagner (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2009. International workshop on context-aware adaptation mechanisms for pervasive and ubiquitous services.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yelp. (2014). Case studies. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
  19. 19.
    Yu, H. Q., Reiff-Marganiec, S. (2009). A backwards composition context based service selection approach for service composition. In IEEE Computer Society (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2009. IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp. 419–426.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yu, H. Q., Reiff-Marganiec, S. (2009) Automated Context-Aware Service Selection for Collaborative Systems. In P. van Eck, J. Gordijn, & R. Wieringa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009, International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 261–274.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang, D., Boonlit, A., Yaser, M. (2009) User-centered context-aware mobile applications—The next generation of personal mobile computing. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 27–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik IIUniversität RegensburgRegensburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations