How Synthetic Biology Will Reconsider Natural Bioluminescence and Its Applications

Part of the Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology book series (ABE, volume 145)


As our understanding of natural biological systems grows, so too does our ability to alter and rebuild them. Synthetic biology is the application of engineering principles to biology in order to design and construct novel biological systems for specific applications. Bioluminescent organisms offer a treasure trove of light-emitting enzymes that may have applications in many areas of bioengineering, from biosensors to lighting. A few select bioluminescent organisms have been well researched and the molecular and genetic basis of their luminescent abilities elucidated, with work underway to understand the basis of luminescence in many others. Synthetic biology will aim to package these light-emitting systems as self-contained biological modules, characterize their properties, and then optimize them for use in other chassis organisms. As this catalog of biological parts grows, synthetic biologists will be able to engineer complex biological systems with the ability to emit light. These may use luminescence for an array of disparate functions, from providing illumination to conveying information or allowing communication between organisms.

Graphical Abstract


Bio-lighting Bioluminescence Chassis organisms Synthetic biology 


  1. 1.
    Ando Y et al (2007) Firefly bioluminescence quantum yield and colour change by pH-sensitive green emission. Nat Photonics 2(1):44–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM international (2012) Standard tables for reference solar spectral irradiances. Accessed 31 July 2013
  3. 3.
    Benner SA, Sismour AM (2005) Synthetic biology. Nat Rev Genet 6(7):533–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berg P et al (1975) Summary statement of the Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci 72(6):1981–1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    BioCurious (2013) Bioluminescence community project | BioCurious on Accessed 7 August 2013
  6. 6.
    Bryan B (2000) Bioluminescent novelty items. U.S. patent 6152358Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bull AT, Holt G, Lilly MD (1982) Biotechnology: international trends and perspectives. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Callaway E (2013) Glowing plants spark debate. Nature 498(7452):15–16Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cannell MGR, Sheppard LJ, Milne R (1988) Light use efficiency and woody biomass production of poplar and willow. Forestry 61(2):125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carlson R (2011) New cost curves—synthesis. Accessed 7 August 2013
  11. 11.
    Cases I, de Lorenzo V (2005) Genetically modified organisms for the environment: stories of success and failure and what we have learned from them. Int Microbiol 8:213–222Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chin JW (2012) Molecular biology. Reprogramming the genetic code. Science (New York, N.Y.) 336(6080):428–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Close DM et al (2010) Autonomous bioluminescent expression of the bacterial luciferase gene cassette (lux) in a mammalian cell line (Pan X ed). PloS one 5(8):p.e12441Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cole H (2006) Living drawings created with bioluminescent bacteria. Accessed 7 August 2013
  15. 15.
    Dirckx P, Mast S, Pitts B (2003) Bioglyphs: painting with living bioluminescent bacteria. Accessed 7 August 2013
  16. 16.
    Doty S (2006) Enhanced metabolism of a variety of environmental pollutants by transgenic plants. In: Presented at the joint annual meeting of the American society of plant biologists and the Canadian society of plant physiologists, Boston, MA, August 5–9, 2006Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Evans A, Taylor K (2013) Glowing plants. Accessed 28 August 2013
  18. 18.
    Gibson DG et al (2010) Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329(5987):52–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gomi K, Kajiyama N (2001) Oxyluciferin, a luminescence product of firefly luciferase, is enzymatically regenerated into luciferin. J Biol Chem 276(39):36508–36513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haddock SHD, Moline MA, Case JF (2010) Bioluminescence in the sea. Annu Rev Marine Sci 2(1):443–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hall DO, Rao K (1999) Photosynthesis, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Highfield R (2010) The science of christmas: we could grow our own fairy lights, say the tree wise men. Daily TelegraphGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hill JE, Kapuscinski AR, Pavlowich T (2011) Fluorescent transgenic zebra danio more vulnerable to predators than wild-type fish. Trans Am Fish Soc 140(4):1001–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kajiyama N, Nakano E (1991) Isolation and characterization of mutants of firefly luciferase which produce different colors of light. Protein Eng 4(6):691–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Karp A et al (2011) Genetic improvement of willow for bioenergy and biofuels. J Integr Plant Biol 53(2):151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Khalil AS, Collins JJ (2010) Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet 11(5):367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Koksharov MI, Ugarova NN (2011) Thermostabilization of firefly luciferase by in vivo directed evolution. Protein Eng Des Sel 24(11):835–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koncz C et al (1987) Expression and assembly of functional bacterial luciferase in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84(1):131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Krichevsky A et al (2010) Autoluminescent plants (Uversky VN ed). PloS one 5(11):p.e15461Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leclerc GM et al (2000) Development of a destabilized firefly luciferase enzyme for measurement of gene expression. BioTechniques 29(3):590–591, 594–596, 598 passimGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu J, Chen T, Xiong H (2012) Programming cells through light. Accessed 28 August 2013
  32. 32.
    Longcore T, Rich C (2004) Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2(4):191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miyamoto C et al (1987) Expression of bioluminescence by Escherichia coli containing recombinant Vibrio harveyi DNA. J Bacteriol 169(1):247–253Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mooney HA, Ehleringer J, Berry JA (1976) High photosynthetic capacity of a winter annual in Death Valley. Science 194:322–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Neumann H et al (2010) Encoding multiple unnatural amino acids via evolution of a quadruplet-decoding ribosome. Nature 464(7287):441–444Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Niwa K, Nakamura M, Ohmiya Y (2006) Stereoisomeric bio-inversion key to biosynthesis of firefly D-luciferin. FEBS Lett 580(22):5283–5287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Okada K et al (1974) Firefly bioluminescence III. Conversion of oxyluciferin to luciferin in firefly. Tetrahedron Lett 15(32):2771–2774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ow DW et al (1986) Transient and stable expression of the firefly luciferase gene in plant cells and transgenic plants. Science 234(4778):856–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Philips NV (2011) Philips—design portfolio—design probes—bio-light. Accessed 7 August 2013
  40. 40.
    Pinheiro VB (2012) Synthetic genetic polymers capable of heredity and evolution. Science 336(6079):341–344 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pokhilko A et al (2012) The clock gene circuit in Arabidopsis includes a repressilator with additional feedback loops. Mol Syst Biol 8:574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Presidential commission for the study of bioethical issues (2010) New directions: the ethics of synthetic biology and emerging technologiesGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sanderson T, Reeve B, Hanley W (2010) Cambridge iGEM project 2010. Accessed 30 July 2013
  44. 44.
    Slabas AR, Fawcett T (1992) The biochemistry and molecular biology of plant lipid biosynthesis (Schilperoort RA, Dure L eds). Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stevani CV et al (2013) Current status of research on fungal bioluminescence: biochemistry and prospects for ecotoxicological application. Photochem Photobiol 89:1318–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sun Y-Q et al (2012) D-luciferin analogues: a multicolor toolbox for bioluminescence imaging. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) 51(34):8428–8430Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Swain F (2010) Glowing trees could light up city streets. New ScientistGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Tang W et al (2007) Enhanced stress tolerance in transgenic pine expressing the pepper CaPF1 gene is associated with the polyamine biosynthesis. Plant Cell Rep 26(1):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Taylor G (2002) Populus: Arabidopsis for forestry. Do we need a model tree? Ann Bot 90(6):681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang W et al (2013) A novel 5-enolpyruvoylshikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase transgene for glyphosate resistance stimulates growth and fecundity in weedy rice (Oryza sativa) without herbicide. New Phytol 14(12):1136–1142Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wright O, Stan G-B, Ellis T (2013) Building-in biosafety for synthetic biology. Microbiology (Reading, England) 159(Pt 7):1221–1235Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Xu T et al (2013) Genetically modified whole-cell bioreporters for environmental assessment. Ecol Indic 28(null):125–141Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yang Z et al (2011) Amplification, mutation, and sequencing of a six-letter synthetic genetic system. J Am Chem Soc 133:15105–15112 Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yonder biology (2013) Kickstarter, DINO PET, a living, interactive, bioluminescent pet. Accessed 7 August 2013

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Synthetic Biology and InnovationImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.The Wellcome Trust Sanger InstituteCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations