Abstract
This chapter discusses the fundamental structure and advantages of the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) algorithm in phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs). ABC estimates unknown parameters as follows: (1) simulated data are generated under a suite of parameters randomly chosen from their prior distributions; (2) the simulated data are compared with empirical data; (3) parameters are accepted when the distance between the simulated and empirical data is small; and (4) by repeating steps (1)–(3), posterior distributions of parameters will be gained. Because ABC does not necessitate mathematical expression or analytic solution of a likelihood function, ABC is particularly useful when a maximum-likelihood (ML) estimation is difficult to conduct (a common situation when testing complex evolutionary models and/or models with many parameters in PCMs). As an application, we analysed trait evolution in which a specific species exhibits an extraordinary trait value relative to others. The ABC approach detected the occurrence of branch-specific directional selection and estimated ancestral states of internal nodes. As computational power increases, such likelihood-free approaches will become increasingly useful for PCMs, particularly for testing complex evolutionary models that deviate from the standard models based on the Brownian motion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beaumont MA (2010) Approximate Bayesian computation in evolution and ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:379–406
Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ (2002) Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 162:2025–2035
Bertorelle G, Benazzo A, Mona S (2010) ABC as a flexible framework to estimate demography over space and time: some cons, many pros. Mol Ecol 19:2609–2625
Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745
Bokma F (2010) Time, species, and separating their effects on trait variance in clades. Syst Biol 59:602–607
Butler MA, King AA (2004) Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am Nat 164:683–695
Csillery K, Blum MG, Gaggiotti OE, François O (2010) Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) in practice. Trends Ecol Evol 25:410–418
Estes S, Arnold SJ (2007) Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am Nat 169:227–244
Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP (2010) Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta-analytic review. Biol Rev 85:797–805
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. CRC Press, London
Gingerich PD (2009) Rate of evolution. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:657–675
Hansen TF (1997) Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341–1351
Harmon LJ, Losos JB, Jonathan Davies T, Gillespie RG, Gittleman JL et al (2010) Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data. Evolution 64:2385–2396
Kutsukake N, Innan H (2013) Simulation-based likelihood approach for evolutionary models of phenotypic traits on phylogeny. Evolution 67:355–367
Leuenberger C, Wegmann D (2010) Bayesian computation and model selection without likelihoods. Genetics 184:243–252
Li W-H (1997) Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts
Losos JB (2011) Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am Nat 177:709–727
Marjoram P, Tavare S (2006) Modern computational approaches for analysing molecular genetic variation data. Nat Genet Rev 7:759–770
Marjoram P, Molitor J, Plagnol V, Tavare S (2003) Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15324–15328
O’Meara BC, Ane CM, Sanderson MJ, Wainwright PC (2006) Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution in different groups using likelihood. Evolution 60:922–933
Pagel M (1997) Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool Scr 26:331–348
Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884
Purvis A (2004) Evolution: how do characters evolve? Nature 432:166
Rabosky DL (2009) Heritability of extinction rates links diversification patterns in molecular phylogenies and fossils. Syst Biol 58:629–640
Ricklefs RE (2004) Cladogenesis and morphological diversification in passerine birds. Nature 430:338–341
Ricklefs RE (2006) Time, species, and the generation of trait variance in clades. Syst Biol 55:151–159
Robert CP, Cornuet JM, Marin JM, Pillai NS (2011) Lack of confidence in approximate Bayesian computation model choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:15112–15117
Schulter D, Price T, Mooers AO, Ludwig D (1997) Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699–1711
Slater GJ, Harmon LJ, Wegmann D, Joyce P, Revell LJ, Alfaro ME (2012) Fitting models of continuous trait evolution to incompletely sampled comparative data using approximate Bayesian computation. Evolution 66:752–762
Tavare S, Balding DJ, Griffiths RC, Donnelly P (1997) Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. Genetics 145:505–518
Toju H, Sota T (2006) Phylogeography and the geographic cline in the armament of a seed-predatory weevil: effects of historical events vs. natural selection from the host plant. Mol Ecol 15:4161–4173
Thomas GH, Freckleton RP, Szekely T (2006) Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1619–1624
Venditti C, Meade A, Pagel M (2011) Multiple routes to mammalian diversity. Nature 479:393–396
Yang Z (2006) Computational molecular evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by PRESTO, JST. We thank Nanako Shigesada and Hirohisa Kishino for discussion and encouragement, Ai Kawamori and Tomohiro Harano for discussion and helpful comments on the draft, and Hirokazu Toju for providing phylogeny data. We are grateful for valuable comments and suggestions by László Zsolt Garamszegi and two reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kutsukake, N., Innan, H. (2014). Detecting Phenotypic Selection by Approximate Bayesian Computation in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods. In: Garamszegi, L. (eds) Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43549-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43550-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)