Skip to main content

Detecting Phenotypic Selection by Approximate Bayesian Computation in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods

  • Chapter
Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

This chapter discusses the fundamental structure and advantages of the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) algorithm in phylogenetic comparative methods (PCMs). ABC estimates unknown parameters as follows: (1) simulated data are generated under a suite of parameters randomly chosen from their prior distributions; (2) the simulated data are compared with empirical data; (3) parameters are accepted when the distance between the simulated and empirical data is small; and (4) by repeating steps (1)–(3), posterior distributions of parameters will be gained. Because ABC does not necessitate mathematical expression or analytic solution of a likelihood function, ABC is particularly useful when a maximum-likelihood (ML) estimation is difficult to conduct (a common situation when testing complex evolutionary models and/or models with many parameters in PCMs). As an application, we analysed trait evolution in which a specific species exhibits an extraordinary trait value relative to others. The ABC approach detected the occurrence of branch-specific directional selection and estimated ancestral states of internal nodes. As computational power increases, such likelihood-free approaches will become increasingly useful for PCMs, particularly for testing complex evolutionary models that deviate from the standard models based on the Brownian motion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beaumont MA (2010) Approximate Bayesian computation in evolution and ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:379–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ (2002) Approximate Bayesian computation in population genetics. Genetics 162:2025–2035

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bertorelle G, Benazzo A, Mona S (2010) ABC as a flexible framework to estimate demography over space and time: some cons, many pros. Mol Ecol 19:2609–2625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg SP, Garland T Jr, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bokma F (2010) Time, species, and separating their effects on trait variance in clades. Syst Biol 59:602–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler MA, King AA (2004) Phylogenetic comparative analysis: a modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am Nat 164:683–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csillery K, Blum MG, Gaggiotti OE, François O (2010) Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) in practice. Trends Ecol Evol 25:410–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes S, Arnold SJ (2007) Resolving the paradox of stasis: models with stabilizing selection explain evolutionary divergence on all timescales. Am Nat 169:227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garamszegi LZ, Møller AP (2010) Effects of sample size and intraspecific variation in phylogenetic comparative studies: a meta-analytic review. Biol Rev 85:797–805

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. CRC Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich PD (2009) Rate of evolution. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:657–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen TF (1997) Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon LJ, Losos JB, Jonathan Davies T, Gillespie RG, Gittleman JL et al (2010) Early bursts of body size and shape evolution are rare in comparative data. Evolution 64:2385–2396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kutsukake N, Innan H (2013) Simulation-based likelihood approach for evolutionary models of phenotypic traits on phylogeny. Evolution 67:355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuenberger C, Wegmann D (2010) Bayesian computation and model selection without likelihoods. Genetics 184:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W-H (1997) Molecular evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Losos JB (2011) Seeing the forest for the trees: the limitations of phylogenies in comparative biology. Am Nat 177:709–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marjoram P, Tavare S (2006) Modern computational approaches for analysing molecular genetic variation data. Nat Genet Rev 7:759–770

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marjoram P, Molitor J, Plagnol V, Tavare S (2003) Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:15324–15328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara BC, Ane CM, Sanderson MJ, Wainwright PC (2006) Testing for different rates of continuous trait evolution in different groups using likelihood. Evolution 60:922–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M (1997) Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool Scr 26:331–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis A (2004) Evolution: how do characters evolve? Nature 432:166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabosky DL (2009) Heritability of extinction rates links diversification patterns in molecular phylogenies and fossils. Syst Biol 58:629–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (2004) Cladogenesis and morphological diversification in passerine birds. Nature 430:338–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricklefs RE (2006) Time, species, and the generation of trait variance in clades. Syst Biol 55:151–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert CP, Cornuet JM, Marin JM, Pillai NS (2011) Lack of confidence in approximate Bayesian computation model choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:15112–15117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulter D, Price T, Mooers AO, Ludwig D (1997) Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater GJ, Harmon LJ, Wegmann D, Joyce P, Revell LJ, Alfaro ME (2012) Fitting models of continuous trait evolution to incompletely sampled comparative data using approximate Bayesian computation. Evolution 66:752–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavare S, Balding DJ, Griffiths RC, Donnelly P (1997) Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. Genetics 145:505–518

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Toju H, Sota T (2006) Phylogeography and the geographic cline in the armament of a seed-predatory weevil: effects of historical events vs. natural selection from the host plant. Mol Ecol 15:4161–4173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GH, Freckleton RP, Szekely T (2006) Comparative analyses of the influence of developmental mode on phenotypic diversification rates in shorebirds. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1619–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venditti C, Meade A, Pagel M (2011) Multiple routes to mammalian diversity. Nature 479:393–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z (2006) Computational molecular evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by PRESTO, JST. We thank Nanako Shigesada and Hirohisa Kishino for discussion and encouragement, Ai Kawamori and Tomohiro Harano for discussion and helpful comments on the draft, and Hirokazu Toju for providing phylogeny data. We are grateful for valuable comments and suggestions by László Zsolt Garamszegi and two reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nobuyuki Kutsukake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kutsukake, N., Innan, H. (2014). Detecting Phenotypic Selection by Approximate Bayesian Computation in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods. In: Garamszegi, L. (eds) Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics