Skip to main content

Towards a Prototype Policy Laboratory for Simulating Innovation Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Simulating Knowledge Dynamics in Innovation Networks

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Abstract

This paper presents an approach for designing and building a computational laboratory for research and innovation policy simulation, centred around the SKIN model. The aim of the paper is to bring together empirical and computational research for policy use. The SKIN model will be embedded in a workflow and an interfacing infrastructure that supports rich user interaction with the lab’s simulation database.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    During the course of the INFSO-SKIN study where we worked with a large database, which was pre-structured into six Calls of FP7, the study team (Nigel Gilbert, Andreas Pyka, Michel Schilperoord, Petra Ahrweiler) started to develop a “multi-calibration/validation” strategy, where the model was supposed to match the network configuration at the end of each Call and start again with the network configuration of the next. This not only gave six points for assessing the calibration/validation performance instead of the usual one, but also provided an opportunity for model learning and fine-tuning. This strategy can be always used when empirical databases are divided into sections containing enough information about time and interim states. The idea could not be followed up systematically at that time, but seems worthwhile to pursue in future work.

References

  • Ahrweiler P (ed) (2010) Innovation in complex social systems. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrweiler P (2012) Conceptual framework of computational policy research: a guiding document and reference for the IPSE consortium. Deliverable D1.1, Project report, http://www.ipse.ie

  • Ahrweiler P, Gilbert N (2005) Caffè nero: the evaluation of social simulation. J Artif Soc Soc Simulat 8(4):14, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/14.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrweiler P, Pyka A, Gilbert N (2011) A new model for university-industry links in knowledge-based economies. J Prod Innovat Manag 28:218–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrweiler P, Schilperoord M, Gilbert N, Pyka A (2012) Final report – using network analysis to monitor and track effects resulting from changes in policy intervention and instruments. SMART 2010-0025, DG INFSO, January 2012, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahrweiler P, Gilbert N, Pyka A (2014b) Innovation policy modeling with SKIN. In: Johnston E et al (eds) Handbook of policy informatics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Taoiseach (2008) Building Ireland’s smart economy: a framework for sustainable economic renewal. Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Using network analysis to assess systemic impacts of research. Workshop report, DG INFSO, Brussels, March 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann R, Hidalgo CA, Bustos S, Coscia M, Chung S, Jimenez J, Simoes A, Yildirim M (2011) The atlas of economic complexity. Puritan, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorscheid I, Heine B-O, Meyer M (2012) Opening the ‘black box’ of simulations: increased transparency and effective communication through the systematic design of experiments. Comput Math Organ Theor 18(1):22–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba F, Nelson R, Orsenigo L, Winter S (1999) ‘History-friendly’ models of industry evolution: the computer industry. Ind Corp Change 8:3–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoes AJG, Hidalgo CA (2011) The Economic Complexity Observatory: an analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of economic development. In: Workshops at the twenty-fifth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, http://atlas.media.mit.edu

  • Windrum P, Fagiolo G, Moneta A (2007) Empirical validation of agent-based models: alternatives and prospects. J Artif Soc Soc Simulat 10(2):8, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/10/2/8.html

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Irish Government’s Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions (PRTLI 5) project grant entitled ‘Innovation Policy Simulation for the Smart Economy (IPSE)’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Schilperoord .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schilperoord, M., Ahrweiler, P. (2014). Towards a Prototype Policy Laboratory for Simulating Innovation Networks. In: Gilbert, N., Ahrweiler, P., Pyka, A. (eds) Simulating Knowledge Dynamics in Innovation Networks. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43508-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics