Analysis and Optimisation of Cyclone Separators Geometry Using RANS and LES Methodologies

Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 125)

Abstract

The flow field pattern and gas cyclone performance have been investigated using both RANS and LES methodologies. The solid phase has been simulated using the one-way coupling approach. Both the RSM model and LES can be used efficiently to simulate the main features flow field pattern and estimate the performance. However, when looking at the flow details, LES can more accurately capture the unsteady flow phenomena of the highly swirling flow. Two different optimisation techniques have been applied (namely, the Nelder-Mead and the genetic algorithms) to obtain the cyclone geometry for minimum pressure drop. Two sources of data for the objective function have been used, mathematical models and experimental data. Starting from a Stairmand design an improved cyclone geometry is found using seven geometrical design variables. A CFD comparison between the original design and the new design has been performed. The simulations confirm the superior performance of the new design.

Keywords

Cyclone Separator Optimisation Reynolds Stress Model Large Eddy Simulation Discrete Phase Modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Derksen, J.J.: Separation performance predictions of a stairmand high-efficiency cyclone. AIChE Journal 49(6), 1359–1371 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Derksen, J.J., Van den Akker, H.E.A.: Simulation of vortex core precession in a reverse-flow cyclone. AIChE Journal 46(7), 1317–1331 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elsayed, K., Lacor, C.: Optimization of the cyclone separator geometry for minimum pressure drop using mathematical models and CFD simulations. Chemical Engineering Science 65(22), 6048–6058 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elsayed, K., Lacor, C.: The effect of cyclone inlet dimensions on the flow pattern and performance. Applied Mathematical Modelling 35(4), 1952–1968 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elsayed, K., Lacor, C.: Numerical modeling of the flow field and performance in cyclones of different cone-tip diameters. Computers & Fluids 51(1), 48–59 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elsayed, K., Lacor, C.: Modeling and pareto optimization of gas cyclone separator performance using RBF type artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Powder Technology 217, 84–99 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elsayed, K., Lacor, C.: The effect of cyclone vortex finder dimensions on the flow pattern and performance using LES. Computers & Fluids 71, 224–239 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoekstra, A.J.: Gas flow field and collection efficiency of cyclone separators. PhD thesis, Technical University Delft (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoekstra, A.J., Derksen, J.J., Van Den Akker, H.E.A.: An experimental and numerical study of turbulent swirling flow in gas cyclones. Chemical Engineering Science 54, 2055–2065 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaya, F., Karagoz, I.: Performance analysis of numerical schemes in highly swirling turbulent flows in cyclones. Current Science 94(10), 1273–1278 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Launder, B.E., Reece, G.J., Rodi, W.: Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 68(3), 537–566 (1975)MATHADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nelder, J.A., Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal 7(4), 308–313 (1965)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shalaby, H.: On the potential of large eddy simulation to simulate cyclone separators. PhD thesis, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shalaby, H., Pachler, K., Wozniak, K., Wozniak, G.: Comparative study of the continuous phase flow in a cyclone separator using different turbulence models. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 48(11), 1175–1197 (2005)MATHADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Slack, M.D., Prasad, R.O., Bakker, A., Boysan, F.: Advances in cyclone modeling using unstructured grids. Trans. IChemE 78 Part A (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations