Skip to main content

A Soft Computing Approach to Model Human Factors in Air Warfare Simulation System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 561))

Abstract

With increasing defence budget constraints and environmental safety concerns on employing live exercises for training, there has been a reinforced focus end considerable efforts on designing military training simulators using modelling, simulation, and analysis for operational analyses and training. Air Warfare Simulation System is an agent-oriented virtual warfare simulator that is designed using these concepts for operational analysis and course of action analysis for training. A critical factor that decides the next course of action and hence the results of the simulation is the skill, experience, situation awareness of the pilot in the aircraft cockpit and the pilots’ decision making ability in the cockpit. Advances in combat aircraft avionics and onboard automation, information from onboard and ground sensors and satellites poses a threat in terms of information and cognitive overload to the pilot, and triggering conditions that makes decision making a difficult task. Several mathematical models of the pilot behaviour, typically based on control theory, have been proposed in literature. In this work, we describe a novel approach based on soft computing and Computational Intelligence paradigms called ANFIS, a neuro-fuzzy hybridization technique, to model the pilot agent and its behaviour characteristics in the warfare simulator. This emerges as an interesting problem as the decisions made are dynamic and depend upon the actions taken by enemy. We also build a pilots’ database that represents the specific cognitive characteristics, skills, training experience, and as factors that affect the pilot’s decision making and study its effect on the results obtained from the warfare simulation. We illustrate the methodology with suitable examples and lessons drawn from the virtual air warfare simulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vijay Rao, D.: The Design of Air Warfare Simulation System. Technical report, Institute for Systems Studies and Analyses (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vijay Rao, D., Kaur, J.: A Fuzzy Rule-based approach to design game rules in a mission planning and evaluation system, In: 6th IFIP Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, Springer, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vijay Rao, D., Saha, B.: An Agent oriented Approach to Developing Intelligent Training Simulators. In: SISO Euro-SIW Conference, Ontario, Canada (June 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vijay Rao, D., Iliadis, L. Spartalis, S. Papaleonidas, A.: Modelling Environmental factors and effects in virtual warfare simulators by using a multi agent approach. Int. J. Artif. Intell. 9(A12), pp. 172–185 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vijay Rao, D. Iliadis, L. Spartalis, S.: A Neuro-Fuzzy Hybridization Approach to Model Weather Operations in a Virtual Warfare Analysis System”. In: Proceedings of the 12th EANN (Engineering Applications of Neural Networks). LNCS AICT, vol. 363(1), pp. 111–121. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vijay Rao, D. Ravi, S. Iliadis, L. Sarma, V.V.S.: “An Ontology based approach to designing adaptive lesson plans in military training simulators”. In: Proceedings of the 13th EANN (Engineering Applications of Neural Networks), LNCS AICT, vol. 363(1), pp. 81–93. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McRuer, D.T. Krendel, E.S.: Mathematical models of human pilot behavior, AGARD monograph No. 188, NATO advisory group on Aerospace research and development. (AGARD), London (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Banks, J.: Handbook of Simulation: Principles, Methodology, Advances, Applications, and Practice. Wiley, New York (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Cox, E.: The Fuzzy Systems Handbook, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taher, J. Zomaya, A.Y.: In: Zomaya, A.Y. (Ed.)Artificial Neural Networks in Handbook of Nature-Inspired and Innovative Computing, Integrating Classical Models with Emerging Technologies, pp. 147–186, Springer USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jang, J.S.R.: ANFIS: Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 23(3), 665–685 (May/June 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jang, J.S.R., Sun, C.T., Mizutani, E.: Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing: A Computational approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence. Prentice Hall, Mahwah (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitra, S., Yoichi, Hayashi: Neuro-fuzzy rule generation: survey in soft computing framework. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11(3), 748–768 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mendel, J.M.: Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems-Introduction and New Directions. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, USA (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Endsley, M.R., Garland, D.J. (eds.): Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karray, F.O., De Silva, C.: Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems-Theory. Tools and Applications, Pearson-Addison Wesley, England (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. MATLAB Fuzzy Logic Toolbox Mathworks http://www.mathworks.com/help/fuzzy/

  18. Nunn,W.R. Oberle, R.A.: Evaluating Air Combat Maneuvering Engagements, Methodology, Center for Naval Analyses, 1402 vol. I Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22209, USA (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parrott, E.: Combat Performance Advantage: Method of Evaluating Air Combat Performance Effectiveness, Aerodynamics and Performance Branch, Technical report ASD-TR-78-364,Aeronautical Systems Division, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433, USA (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Triantaphyllou, E. Mann, S.H.: An Examination of the Effectiveness of Multi-Dimensional Decision-Making Methods: A Decision-Making Paradox, Decision Support Systems vol. 5, 303–312, North Holland (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jaiswal, N.K.: Military Operations Research: Quantitative Decision Making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Markushostmanna, Bernauer, Hans-Joachimmosler, T.: Peterreichert, Bernhardtruffer, multi-attribute value theory as a framework for conflict resolution in river Rehabilitation. J. Multi-Crit Decis. Anal. 13, 91–102 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tolk, A.: Engineering Principles of Combat Modeling and Distributed Simulation. Wiley, USA (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodin, E.Y., Amin, S.M.: Maneuver prediction in air combat via artificial neural networks. Comput. Math. Appl. 24, 95–112 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gorman, P.R., Sejnowski, T.J.: Analysis of hidden units in a layered network trained to classify sonar targets. Neural Netw. 1, 75–89 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. N.H. Farhat, S. Miyahara, K.S. Lee, Optical Analog of Two-Dimensional Neural Networks and their Applications in Recognition of Radar Targets, pp. 146–152. American Institute of Physics, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meier, C.D. Stenerson, R.O.: Recognition networks for tactical air combat maneuvers, In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual AAAI Conference, Dayton, OH (Oct. 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchell, R.R.: Expert systems and air-combat simulation. AI Expert 4(9), pp. 38–43 (Sept. 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morgan, A.J.: Predicting the behaviour of dynamic systems with qualitative vectors. In: Hallam, J. Mellish C. (eds.) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 81–95. Wiley, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tran, C. Abraham, A. Jain, L.: Adaptation of a Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System Using Neuro-genetic Approach for Tactical Air Combat Decision Support System, AI 2002: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (2557). In: Proceedings 15th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Canberra, pp. 672–680 Springer, Australia 2–6 Dec 2002

    Google Scholar 

  31. Heinze, C.: Modelling Intention Recognition for Intelligent Agent Systems, DSTO-RR-0286, DSTO Systems Sciences Laboratory, Edinburgh, South Australia, Australia 5111, (ADA430005), (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Intelligent agents:theory and practice. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 10(12), 115–152 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bratman, Michael E.: Intention, Plans, and Practical Reasoning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rao A.S. Georgeff, M.P. :An Abstract Architecture for Rational Agents. In: Rich, C. Swartout, W. Nebel, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’92), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, USA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Endsley, M.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 31(l), 32–64 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Endsley, M.: The role of situation awareness in naturalistic decision making. In: Zsambok C.E. Klein, G. (eds.) Naturalistic Decision Making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, USA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  37. McManus, J.W. Goodrich, K.H. Artificial Intelligence Based Tactical Guidance For Fighter Aircraft. In: AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 20–22 August 1990, Portland, Oregon, USA (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Heinze, C. Smith, B. Cross M.: Thinking quickly: agents for modeling air warfare. In Proceedings of the 9th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AP98), Brisbane, Australia (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rao, A.S. Murray, G.: Multi-agent mental-state recognition and its application to air-combat modeling. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshopon Distributed Artificial Intelligence (DAI-94), pp. 283–304. Seattle, WA, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rao, A.: A unified view of plans as recipes. Technical Report 77, Australian Artificial Intelligence Institute, Melbourne, Australia, August (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rao, A.S.: Means-end plan recognition—towards a theory of reactive recognition. In Doyle, J. Sandewall, E. Torasso, P. (eds.) Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 497–508, Bonn, FRG, May Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; San Francisco, CA, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rao, A.S. Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a bdi-architecture. In: Second International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, San Mateo, CA, (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rao, A.S. Georgeff, M.P.: BDI-agents: from theory to practice, In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multiagent Systems, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rao, A.S. Georgeff, M.P.: Formal models and decision procedures for multi-agent systems, Technical report Technical Note 61, Australian AI Institute, 171 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, Australia (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Weerasooriya, D. Rao, A. Ramamohanarao, K.: Design of a concurrent agent oriented language. In: Wooldridge M. Jennings N.R. (eds.) Intelligent Agents: Theories, Architectures, and Languages (LNAI), vol. 890, pp. 386–402. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Goodrich, K.H. McManus, J.W.: Development of A Tactical Guidance Research and Evaluation System(TGRES). AIAA Paper #89–3312, (August 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  47. McManus, J.W. Goodrich, K.H.: “Application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programming Techniques to Tactical Guidance for Fighter Aircraft.” AIAA Paper #89–3525, (August 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Goodrich, K.H. McManus J.W.: “An Integrated Environment For Tactical Guidance Research and Evaluation.” AIAA Paper #90–1287 (May 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  49. McManus, J.W. : “A Parallel Distributed System for Aircraft Tactical Decision Generation.” In: Proceedings of the Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Virginia Beach, VA (October 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ni, H.: Penny : BlackBoard Systems: The Blackboard Model of Problem solving and the Evolution Of Blackboard Architectures. AI Mag. 7(3), 38–53 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Burgin, G.H. et al.: An Adaptive Maneuvering Logic Computer Program for the Simulation of One-on-One Air-to-Air Combat. (NASA) vol I–II, pp. CR-2582–CR-2583 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Michael, W.: Intelligent agents. In: Weiss, G. (ed) Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 27–78. The MIT Press, Cambridge, USA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lucas, A., Goss, S., The Potential For Intelligent Software Agents in defence simulation. In: Proceedings of the Information, Decision and Control, pp. 579–583, Adelaide, SA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Norling, E.J. Modelling Human Behaviour with BDI Agents, PhD. Thesis, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Melbourne, (June 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Boril, J. Jalovecky, R.: Experimental Identification of Pilot Response Using Measured Data from a Flight Simulator In: Proceedings of the 13th EANN (Engineering Applications of Neural Networks), LNCS AICT vol. 363(1), Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Boril, J. Jalovecky, R.: Response of the Mechatronic System, Pilot—Aircraft on Incurred Step Disturbance. In: 53rd International Symposium ELMAR-2011, pp. 261–264. ITG, Zagreb (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jalovecky, R. Janu, P.: Human—Pilot’s Features During Aircraft Flight Control from Automatic Regulation Viewpoint. In: 4th International Symposium on Measurement, Analysis and Modeling of Human Functions, pp. 119–123. Czech Republic: Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Jalovecky, R.: Man in the Aircraft’s Flight Control System. Adv. Mil. Technol.—J. Sci., vol. 4(1), pp. 49–57 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Cameron, N., Thomson, D.G., Murray-Smith, D.J.: Pilot Modelling and Inverse Simulation for Initial Handling Qualities Assessment. Aeronaut.J. 107(1744), 511–520 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Boril, J. Jalovecky, R.: Simulation of Mechatronic System Pilot—Aircraft—Oscillation Damper. In: ICMT´11—International Conference on Military Technologies, pp. 591–597. University of Defence, Brno (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Vijay Rao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vijay Rao, D., Balas-Timar, D. (2014). A Soft Computing Approach to Model Human Factors in Air Warfare Simulation System. In: Balas, V., Koprinkova-Hristova, P., Jain, L. (eds) Innovations in Intelligent Machines-5. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 561. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43370-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43370-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43369-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43370-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics