Abstract
In the past, many economists writing on the subject of exhaustible resources have utilized the concept of consumer surplus as the benefit function to be evaluated [e.g. Hotelling, 1931; Manne]. Unfortunately, as is well-known, this measure, first proposed by Dupuit in 1844, is fraught with difficulties. However, many economists have doggedly refused to abandon consumer surplus procedures, largely on the grounds that no suitable alternative exists. Fortunately, this is no longer the case. In this paper, I propose to develop a simple computational procedure for accurately approximating welfare variations. The method represents an extension of the procedures discussed by Pearce and myself [1976, 1982a].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Antonelli, G.B.: Sulla teoria matematica della economia politica. Pisa 1886; English translation “On the Mathematical Theory of Political Economy” J.S. Chipman et al. Preferences, Utility and Demand. New York 1971, 332–364.
Hildebrand, F.B.: Introduction to Numerical Analysis. New York 1974.
Hotelling, H.: The Economics of Exhaustible Resources. Journal of Political Economy 39, 1931, 137–175.
Hotelling, H.: The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of Railway and Utility Rates. Econometrica 6, 1938, 242–269.
Houthakker, H.S.: Additive Preferences. Econometrica 28, 1960, 62–87.
Manne, A.S.: ETA: A Model for Energy Technology Assessment. Bell Journal of Economics 7, 1976, 379–406.
McKenzie, G.W.: Measuring Gains and Losses. Journal of Political Economy 84, 1976, 641–646.
McKenzie, G.W.: Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology: A Comment. American Economic Review 69, 1979, 465–468.
McKenzie, G.W.: New Methods for Measuring Economic Welfare. Cambridge 1982.
McKenzie, G. W., and I.F. Pearce: Exact Measures of Welfare and the Cost of Living. Review of Economic Studies 43, 1976, 465–468.
McKenzie, G. W., and I.F. Pearce: Welfare Measurement — A Unification. American Economic Review 72, 1982.
Pearce, I.F.: A Contribution to Demand Analysis. Oxford 1964.
Samuelson, P.A.: Constancy of the Marginal Utility of Income. Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics. Ed. by O. Lange, F. Mclntyre, and T.O. Yntema, Chicago 1942.
Samuelson, P.A.: Complementarity — An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory. Journal of Economic Literature 12, 1255–89.
Vartia, Y. O.: Efficient Methods of Measuring Welfare Change and Compensated Income in Terms of Market Demand Functions. Keskustelvaiheta Discussion Papers, No. 20. The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki 1978.
Willig, R.D.: Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology: Reply. American Economic Review 69, 1979, 469–474.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
McKenzie, G. (1982). Applied Welfare Indicators and the Economics of Exhaustible Resources. In: Eichhorn, W., Henn, R., Neumann, K., Shephard, R.W. (eds) Economic Theory of Natural Resources. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41575-7_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41575-7_32
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0274-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-41575-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive