Skip to main content

An Experimental Test of Several Theories of Committee Decision Making Under Majority Rule

  • Chapter
Book cover Applied Game Theory

Abstract

This paper reports a series of thirty-four experiments that are designed to test the adequacy of several alternative theories of group choice under “majority rule” when no Condorcet point (core) exists. The games we use in these experiments seek, in particular, to establish as much separation as possible between the predictions of several alternative solution concepts and, thereby, to provide a critical test of these competing theories. Briefly, our results strongly support the competitive solution notions for n-person game theory [cf., McKelvey /Ordeshook /Winer], but they provide little if any support for the V-set, the (math) Bargaining Set, Asscher’s [19761 Ordinal Bargaining Set, M°, and several solutions based on vulnerability. The first section of this essay defines and discusses the various solution theories. Section 2 describes our experimental design, and Sections 3 and 4 review the results of these experiments.

This research is supported by an NSF Grant #SOC77-15267 to Carnegie-Mellon University-We also wish to thank Rod Gretlein for technical assistance in computation of the various solutions reported herin and Ed Packel and M. Maschler for comments on an earlier draft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asscher, N.: An Ordinal Bargaining Set for Games Without Sidepayments. Mathematics of Operations Research 1 (4), 1976, 381–389.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R.J., and M. Maschler: The Bargaining Set for Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematical Studies 52, 1964, 443–476.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Berl, J., R.D. McKelvey, P.C. Ordeshook, and M. Winer: An Experimental Test of the Core in A Simple TV-Person Cooperative Nonsidepayment Game. Journal of Conflict Resolution 20, 1976, 453–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billera, L.J.: Existence of General Bargaining Sets for Games Without Side Payments. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 76, 1970, 375–379.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A., M.P. Fiorina, and E.W. Packel: A Non Equilibrium Approach to Legislative Decision Theory. Social Science Working Paper 202, California Institute of Technology, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A., M.P. Fiorina, and H.A. Weisburg: Toward a Theory of Legislative Decision. Game Theory and Political Science. Ed. by P.C. Ordeshook. New York 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M., and Ch. Plott: Committee Decisions Under Majority Rule: An Experimental Study. American Political Science Review 72 (2), 1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, R.M., and Ch. Plott: Cooperative Game Models of the Influence of the Closed Rule in Three Person Majority Rule Committees: Theory and Experiments. Game Theory and Political Science. Ed. by P.C. Ordeshook. New York 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G.H.: A Dynamical Model of Political Equilibrium. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 396, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J.D., and S. Olmstead: Policy Making by Committees: An Experimental and Game Theoretic Study. Game Theory and Political Science. Ed. by P.C. Ordeshook. New York 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D., and P.C. Ordeshook: Competitive Coalition Theory. Game Theory and Political Science. Ed. by P.C. Ordeshook. New York, forthcoming, 1978a.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D., and P.C. Ordeshook: Vote Trading: An Experimental Study. Public Choice, forthcoming, 1978b.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D., and P.C. Ordeshook: Some Experimental Evidence for Complex Choice in Cooperative Games with Cores Using Simple Majority Rule, mineo, 1978c.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D., P.C. Ordeshook, and M. Winer: The Competitive Solution for TV-Person Games Without Sidepayments. American Political Science Review, June 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B.: Bargaining Sets of Cooperative Games Without Side Payments. Israel Journal of Mathematics 1, 1963, 197–200.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B.: Existence Theorem for the Bargaining Set (math). Essays in Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern. Ed. by M. Shubik. Princeton 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peleg, B.: The Extended Bargaining Set for Cooperative Games Without Side Payments. Research Program in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, Department of Mathematics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, Research Memorandum No. 44, March 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Th.: Rationality and the Myth of the Maximum. Nous 6, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, P.: On Defining Areas of Voter Choice: Professor Tullock on Stable Voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 83, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

S. J. Brams A. Schotter G. Schwödiauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKelvey, R.D., Ordeshook, P.C. (1979). An Experimental Test of Several Theories of Committee Decision Making Under Majority Rule. In: Brams, S.J., Schotter, A., Schwödiauer, G. (eds) Applied Game Theory. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41501-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-41501-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0208-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-41501-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics