Adapting and Devising Projective Methods for Special Purposes

  • A. I. Rabin


Conventional projective techniques have been, from the start, primarily used as clinical and research instruments for the study of the “total personality.” One of the major characteristics which define projective methods, according to some authors, is their multi-dimensionality. Methods such as the Rorschach and TAT attempt a complete and global description of personality and its dynamics. The approach has been primarily idiographic—utilizing Gestalt principles—in which the interrelationships of a multiplicity of personality variables, traits, attitudes, characteristics, sentiments, and motives have been described and delineated with varying degrees of completeness. In clinical situations, diagnostic descriptions and formulations based on these constellations of characteristics have been the final result.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allinsmith, W. The learning of moral standards. In D. R. Miller & G. E. Swanson (Eds.), Inner Conflict and Defense. New York: Holt, 1960.Google Scholar
  2. Andrew, Gwen, Hartwell, S. W., Hutt, M. L., & Walton, R. E. The Michigan Picture Test. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1953.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.), Motives in Fantasy, Action and Society. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand, 1958.Google Scholar
  4. Baughman, E. E. The role of the stimulus in Rorschach responses. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 121–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellak, L., & Bellak, Sonya S. Children’s Apperception Test (CAT). Larchmont, N.Y.: C.P.S. Co., 1961.Google Scholar
  6. Blum, G. S. A study of the psychoanalytic theory of psychosexual development. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1949, 39, 3–99.Google Scholar
  7. Brackbill, G. A. Some effects of color on thematic fantasy. J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 412–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Engel, Mary. The development and applications of the children’s insight test. J. proj. Tech., 1959, 22, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epstein, E. Some theoretical considerations on the nature and ambiguity and the use of stimulus dimensions in projective techniques. J. consult. Psychol., 1966, 30, 183–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fein, Leah G. The Three-Dimensional Personality Test. New York: International Universities Press, 1960.Google Scholar
  11. Forer, B. R. Custom-built projective methods: a symposium. Introduction. J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 3–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibby, R. G. The stability of certain Rorschach variables under conditions of experimentally induced sets. 1. The intellectual variables. J. proj. Tech., 1951, 15, 3–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein, F. J. “Custom-made or store-bought” projective techniques; what do they represent? J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 11–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henry, W. E. The Analysis of Fantasy. New York: Wiley, 1950.Google Scholar
  15. Henry, W. E. The TAT in the study of culture-personality relations. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1947, 35, 1–34.Google Scholar
  16. Holtzman, W. H., Thorpe, J. S., Swartz, J. D., & Herron, E. W. Inkblot Perception and Personality. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  17. Kerman, E. F. Cypress knees and the blind. J. proj. Tech., 1959, 23, 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. King, G. F. Rorschach and Levy movement responses: a research note. J. clin. Psychol., 1955, 11, 193–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lazarus, R. S. The influence of color on the protocol of the Rorschach Test. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 1949, 44, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lesser, G. S. Custom-making projective tests for research. J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 21–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindzey, G. Projective Techniques and Cross-cultural Research. New York: Appleton-Century-rofts, 1961.Google Scholar
  22. McClelland, D. C, Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murstein, B. I. Theory and Research in Projective Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1963.Google Scholar
  24. Neugarten, Bernice L., & associates. Personality in Middle and Later Life. New York: Atherton Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  25. Parker, S. Ethnic identity and acculturation in two Eskimo villages. Am. Anthropol, 1964, 66, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabin, A. I. Devising projective methods for personality research. J. proj. Tech., 1961, 25, 6–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rabin, A. I., & Sanderson, M. H. An experimental inquiry into some Rorschach procedures. J. clin. Psychol, 1947, 3, 216–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rust, R. Some conclates of the movement response. J. Pers., 1948, 16, 369–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shapiro, Edna, Biber, Barbara, & Minnchin, Patricia. The cartoon situation test: a semi-structured technique for assessing aspects of personality pertinent to the teaching process. J. proj. Tech., 1957, 21, 172–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shneidman, E. The Make-A-Picture Story Test. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1949.Google Scholar
  31. Stotsky, B. A., & Weinberg, H. The prediction of the psychiatric patient’s work adjustment. J. counsel Psychol, 1956, 3, 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thompson, C. E. Thompson Modification of the Thematic Apperception Test. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  33. Weiskopf, Edith A. An experimental study of the effect of brightness and ambiguity on projection in the TAT. J. Psychol, 1950, 29, 407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zax, M., & Strieker, G. The effect of a structured inquiry on Rorschach scores. J. consult. Psychol, 1960, 24, 328–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zubin, J., Eron, L. D., & Schumer, Florence. An Experimental Approach to Projective Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. I. Rabin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations