Skip to main content

Public X-Inefficiency: Informational and Institutional Constraints

  • Conference paper
Anatomy of Government Deficiencies

Abstract

The subject allotted to me seems to indicate the following agenda:

  1. (1)

    Present a model which indicates how X-inefficiency can arise in public bureaucracy;

  2. (2)

    Outline the stages of investigation designed to determine its extent; and

  3. (3)

    Consider how far there are built-in incentives to remove it.

I gladly acknowledge my indebtness to my colleague Martin Ricketts, particularly in respect of the formulation of the model in section 8.2. of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blankart, Ch. B. (1980), “Bureaucratic Problems in Public Choice: Why Do Public Goods Still Remain Public?” in: K. W. Roskamp (ed.), Public Choice and Public Finance, Proceedings of the 34th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance 1978 in Hamburg, Paris: Editions Cujas, pp. 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, L. (1979), Your Disobedient Servant, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Pengu in Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant, P. N., E. M. Gramlich and D. L. Rubinfeld (1979), “Public Employee Market Power and the Level of Government Spending”, American Economic Review, 69, pp. 806–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. F. and R. G. Noll (1978a), “Voters, Legislators and Bureaucracy: Institutional Design in the Public Sector”, American Economic Review, 68 (Papers and Proceedings), pp. 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina, M. F. and -R. G. Noll (1978b), “Voters, Bureaucrats and Legislators”, Journal of Public Economics, 9, pp. 239–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte, F. and A. di Pierro (1980), “ A Pure Model of Public Bureaucracy”, Public Finance, 35 (no. 1, Festschrift: Paul Senf ), pp. 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, H. and A. Wildaysky (1974), The Private Government of Public Money, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H. (1973), The Bureaucratization of the World, Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1978), “On the Basic Proposition of X-Inefficiency Theory”, American Economic Review, 68 (Papers and Proceedings), pp. 328–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyes, T. A. J. (1979), Some Experience with the Control of the Growth of Public Expenditure in the Netherlands, I EA Conference on The Grants Economy and Collective Consumption, Cambridge (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1976), “The Revealed Preferences of a Government Bureaucracy: Empirical Evidence”, Bell Journal of Economics, 7, pp. 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzechowski, W. (1977), “Economic Models of Bureaucracy: Survey Extensions and Evidence”, in: Th. E. Borcherding (ed.), Budgets and Bureaucrats, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 229–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, A. T. (1979), The Economic Analysis of Government and Related Themes, Oxford: Mart in Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. (1952), Economics of Welfare, 4th ed., London: Mcmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorn, P. and P. Friedrich (1976), Verwaltungsökonomie I, Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1975), „Über die Grenzen der Medizin“, in: F. Duve (ed.), Technologie und Politik, 2, Reinbek: Rowohlt Taschenbuchverlag, pp. 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1966), “Allocative versus ‘X-Efficiency’ ”, American Economic Review, 56, pp. 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1978a), X-Inefficiency Xists-Reply to an Xorcist’; American Economic Review, pp. 203–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1978b), General X-Efficiency. Theory and Economic Development, New York — London — Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1978c), “On the Basic Proposition of X-Inefficiency Theory”, American Economic Review, 68 (Papers and Proceedings), pp. 328–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needleman, M.L. and C.E. Needleman (1974), Guerrillas in the Bureaucracy, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orzechowski, W. (1977), “Economic Models of Bureaucracy: Survey, Extensions, and Evidence”, in: Th. E. Borcherding (ed.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 229–259.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peacock, A. (1983). Public X-Inefficiency: Informational and Institutional Constraints. In: Hanusch, H. (eds) Anatomy of Government Deficiencies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21610-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21610-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-21612-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-21610-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics