Skip to main content

Inefficiencies in the Public Sector: Aspects of Demand and Supply

  • Conference paper
Anatomy of Government Deficiencies
  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

Questions of efficiency and inefficiency in the public sector have concerned economics ever since the optimal use of resources to achieve specific ends became the major concern of this discipline.

The author acknowledges the capable assistance of Lothar Thürmer in preparing the paper. Thanks are also due to Wolfgang Stolper who helped in editing the English.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bergstrom, T.C. (1979), When Does Majority Rule Supply Public Goods Efficiently?, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81, pp. 216–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding,Th.E.,W.C. Bush and R.M. Spann (1977), The Effects on Public Spending of the Divisibility of Public Outputs in Consumption, Bureaucratic Power, and the Size of the Tax-Sharing Group, in: Th.E. Borcherding (ed.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H.R. (1943), The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 58, pp. 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G. and J.M. Buchanan (1980), The Power to Tax: Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. and R. Wintrobe (1975), The Equilibrium Size of a Budget-Maximizing Bureau: A Note on Niskanen’s Theory of Bureaucracy, Journal of Political Economy, 83, pp. 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton, A. and R. Wintrobe (1979), Bureaucracy and State Intervention: Parkinson’s Law?, Canadian Public Administration, 22, pp. 208–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.M. (1975), The Limits of Liberty, Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, W.C. and A.T. Denzau (1977), The Voting Behavior of Bureaucrats and Public Sector Growth, in: Th. E. Borcherding, (ed.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant, P.N., E.M. Gramlich and D. L. Rubinfeld (1979), Public Employee Market Power and the Level of Government Spending, American Economic Review, 69, pp. 806–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A.T. and R.J. Mackay (1980), A Model of Benefit and Tax Share Discrimination by a Monopoly Bureau, Journal of Public Economics, 13, pp. 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1960), Why the Government Budget is too Small in a Democracy, World Politics, 13, pp. 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.K. (1969), The Affluent Society, 2nd ed. revised, Boston: Houghton Miffl in Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettich, W. (1975), Bureaucrats and Public Goods, Public Choice, 21, pp. 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R.G. (1977), The Florida System: A Bowen Equilibrium Referendum Process, National Tax Journal, 30, pp. 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcombe, R.G. (1980), An Empirical Test of the Median Voter Model, Economic Inquiry, 18, pp. 260–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R.J. and C. L. Weaver (1978), Monopoly Bureaus and Fiscal Outcomes: Deductive Models and Implications for Reform, in: G. Tullock and R.E. Wagner (ed.), Policy Analysis and Deductive Reasoning, Lexington-Toronto: Heath and Company, pp. 141–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskin, E. (1979), Voting for Public Alternatives: Some Notes on Majority Rule, National Tax Journal, 32, no. 2, Supplement (Proceedings of a Conference on Tax and Expenditure Limitations), pp. 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migué, J.L. and G. Bélanger (1974), Toward a General Theory of Managerial Discretion, Public Choice, 17, pp. 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1971), Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago: Aldine Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W.A. (1975), Bureaucrats and Politicians, Journal of Law and Economics, 18, pp. 617–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orzechowski, W. (1977), Economic Models of Bureaucracy: Survey, Extensions, and Evidence, in: Th.E. Borcherding (ed.), Budgets and Bureaucrats: The Sources of Government Growth, Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 229–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Th. and H. Rosenthal (1979a), Bureaucrats versus Voters: On the Political Economy of Resource Allocation by Direct Democracy, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93, pp. 563–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Th. and H. Rosenthal (1979b), The Elusive Median Voter, Journal of Public Economics, 12, pp. 143–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1976), Optimal Taxation. An Introduction to the Literature, Journal of Public Economics, 6, pp. 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1970), Finanz-und Steuerpsychologie. Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwirtschaft, Reinbek b. Hamburg: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1975), Einführung in die Geld und Finanzpsychologie, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1972), Review of William A. Niskanen, Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Public Choice, 12, pp. 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1974), Dynamic Hypothesis on Bureaucracy, Public Choice, 19, pp. 127131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1922), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie, Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hanusch, H. (1983). Inefficiencies in the Public Sector: Aspects of Demand and Supply. In: Hanusch, H. (eds) Anatomy of Government Deficiencies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21610-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21610-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-21612-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-21610-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics