Skip to main content

Application of Church-Rosser Properties to Increase the Parallelism and Efficiency of Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • 502 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 14))

Abstract

Besides the Church-Rosser property (here called full), three other commutativity properties of transformations (the mutual, inner and strong Church-Rosser property) are also defined, which are less restrictive than the first. These properties are used to decide:

  1. 1)

    when and how the rules belonging to the same loop can be applied in parallel

  2. 2)

    when a rule can be eliminated

  3. 3)

    when a rule can be removed from a loop.

The transformations of algorithms our methods yield are particularly significant in that they depend only on the semantics of the original algorithm, i.e., the input-output relations.

To perform the parallelization (point 1), a new model of structured programming language is used, sufficiently general to ensure that every program can be automatically translated into a structured one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Böhm, C., M. Dezani-Ciancaglini, To what extent can or must a computation be parallelized, to appear in Proc. of the International Summer School on New Concepts and Technologies in Parallel Information Processing, ed.E. Caianiello, NATO ASI SERIES.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Böhm, C., G. Jacopini, Flow Diagrams, Turing Machines and Languages with only two Formation Rules, Comm.of the ACM,9, 5, (1966), 366–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caracciolo di Forino, A., Generalized Markow Algorithms and Automata Theory„ Proc. of the International Summer School on Automata Theory, ed. E.Caianiello, Academic Press, New Yrk, (1966), 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Germano, G., A. Maggiolo-Schettini, Equivalence of Partial Recursivity and Computability by Algorithms Without Concluding Formulas, Calcolo, 8, (1971), 273–291.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Keller, M., On maximally parallel schemata, IEEE Conf., Santa Monica, (1970), 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keller, M., Parallel program schemata and maximal parallelism 1: Fundamental results, Journal of the ACM, 20, 3, (1973), 514–537.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Keller, M., Parallel program schemata and maximal parallelism 11: Construction of Closures, Journal of the ACM, 20, 4, (1973), 696–710.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Knuth, D.E., P.E.Bendix, Simple Word Problem in Universal Algebra, Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, ed. J.Leech, Pergamon Press, Braunschweig, (1970), 263–297.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knuth, D.E., The Art of Computer Programming, Addison-Wesley, 1, (1968), 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Manna, Z., S. Ness, J. Vuillemin, Inductive Methods for Proving Properties of Programs, Proc. of ACM Conference on Proving Assertion About Programs, Las Cruces, (1972), 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosen, B.K., Tree Manipulating Systems and Church-Rosser Theorems, ACM Journal, 20, (1973), 160–187.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Roucairol, G., Une transformation de programmes sequentiels en programmes paralleles, to appear in Proc. of Colloque sur la programmation, Paris, Springer Verlag ed., (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roucairol, G., A., Widory, Programmes sequentiels et parallelisme, R.A.I.R.O., B-2, (1973), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wirth, M., Systematiches Programnieren, B.G. Tenbner, Stuttgart, (1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1974 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dezani-Ciancaglini, M., Zacchi, M. (1974). Application of Church-Rosser Properties to Increase the Parallelism and Efficiency of Algorithms. In: Loeckx, J. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 1974. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21545-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-21545-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-06841-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-21545-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics