Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine ((YEARBOOK,volume 2000))

  • 235 Accesses

Abstract

“Physicians tend to be unimpressed with the descriptions of intensive care units (ICUs). It seems to them that the assessments of the results are naive, survival being taken as equivalent of a life saved. They suspect that, however expert the handling of an apparatus, there is still a shallow understanding of the disease and over-readiness to employ the most dramatic treatment... One is tempted to say that the treatment is often more intense than careful... I believe, therefore, with many of my colleagues, that (the development of ICUs) will prove to have been an aberrations”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Office of Technology Assessment (1984) Intensive Care Units: Clinical outcomes, costs, and decision making. Health Technology Case Study 28. Washington, DC, Office of Technology Assessment

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jacobs P, Noseworthy TW (1990) National estimates of intensive care utilization and costs: Canada and the United States. Crit Care Med18: 1282–1286

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barns JL, Miranda DR (1985) Outcomes and costs of intensive care. Intensive Care Med 11: 234–241

    Google Scholar 

  4. Parno J, Teres D, Lemoshow S, et al (1982) Hospital charges and longterm survival of ICU versus non-ICU patients. Crit Care Med 10: 569–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Surgenor SD, Mroz WT, Henry SA, Clerico T, Corwin HL (1998) Cost of hospital care for selected diagnosis related groups with and without intensive care unit admission. Crit Care Med 26: A42 (Abst)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esserman L, Belkora J, Lenert L (1995) Potentially ineffective care. A new outcome to assess the limits of critical care. JAMA 274: 1544–1551

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mizock B, Weil MH (1993) History and destiny of critical care medicine. In: Carlson R, Geheb M (eds) Principles and Practice of Medical and Intensive Care. WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1986) An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med 104: 410–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wagner DP, Knaus WA, Draper EA (1983) Statistical validation of a severity of illness measure. Am J Pub Health 73: 878–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE, et al (1993) Variation in hospital mortality and length of stay from intensive care: Findings of the APACHE III study. Ann Intern Med 118: 753–761

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li TC, Phillips MC, Shaw LS, et al (1984) On-site physician staffing in a community hospital intensive care unit. JAMA 252: 2023–2030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Manthous CA, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Al-Kharrat T, et al (1997) Effects of a medical intensivist on patient care in a community teaching hospital. Mayo Clinic Proc 72: 391–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brown JJ, Sullivan G (1989) Effect on ICU mortality of a full-time critical care specialist. Chest 96: 127–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Young M, Gooder V, Bohman C, et al (1998) The impact of a multidisciplinary approach on caring for ventilator-dependent patients. Int J Qual Health Care 10: 15–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pronovost PJ, Jenckes MW, Dorman T, et al (1999) Organizational characteristics of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery. JAMA 281: 1310–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Safar P, Grenvik A (1977) Organization and physician staffing in a community hospital intensive care unit. Anesthesiology 47: 82–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Carson SS, Stocking C, Podsadecki T, et al (1996) Effects of organizational change in the medical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. JAMA 276: 322–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Groeger JS, Strosberg MA, Halpern NA, et al (1992) Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United States. Crit Care Med 10: 157–177

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds HN, Haupt MT, Thill-Baharozian MC, et al (1994) Impact of critical care physician staffing on patients with septic shock in a university hospital medical intensive care unit. JAMA 260: 3446–3450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Multz AS, Chaflin DB, Samson IM, et al (1998) A `closed’ medical intensive care unit ( MICU) improves resource utilization when compared with an `open’ MICU. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157: 1468–1473

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marini CP, Nathan IM, Ritter G, et al (1995) The impact of full-time surgical intensivists on ICU utilization and mortality. Crit Care Med 23: A235 (Abst)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Farley DE, Ozminkowski RJ (1992) Volume-outcome relationships and in hospital mortality: The effect of changes in volume over time. Med Care 30: 77–94

    Google Scholar 

  23. Flood AB, Scott WR, Ewy W (1984) Does practice make perfect? I: The relation between hospital volume and outcomes for selected diagnostic categories. Med Care 22: 98–114

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones J, Rowan K (1995) Is there a relationship between the volume of work carried out in intensive care and its outcome? Int J Tech Assess Health Care 4: 762–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalb PE, Miller DH (1989) Utilization strategies for intensive care units. JAMA 261: 2389–2395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sprung CL, Geber D, Eidelman LA (1999) Evaluation of triage decisions for intensive care admission. Crit Care Med 27: 1073–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. SUPPORT Principle Investigators (1995) A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. JAMA 274: 1591–1598

    Google Scholar 

  28. Charlson ME, Sax FL (1987) The therapeutic efficacy of critical care units from two perspectives: A traditional cohort approach vs. a new case control methodology. J Chronic Dis 40: 31–39

    Google Scholar 

  29. Charlson ME, Sax FL, Mackenzie CR, et al (1987) Morbidity during hospitalization: Can we predict it? J Chronic Dis 40: 705–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ron A, Aronne LJ, Kalb PE, et al (1989) The therapeutic efficacy of critical care units: identifying subgroups of patients who benefit. Arch Intern Med 149: 338–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Giraud T, Dhainaut JF, Valexaire JF, et al (1993) Iatrogenic complications in adult intensive care units: A prospective two-center study. Crit Care Med 21: 40–51

    Google Scholar 

  32. Batelden PB (1991) Organization-wide quality improvement in health care. Topics in Health Records Management 11: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  33. Berwick DM (1989) Sounding Board: Continuous improvement as an ideal in health care. N Eng J Med 320: 53–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Young, M.P., Surgenor, S.D., Corwin, H.L. (2000). ICU Organization: Does it Matter?. In: Vincent, JL. (eds) Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2000. Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, vol 2000. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13455-9_68

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13455-9_68

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66830-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-13455-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics