Skip to main content
  • 91 Accesses

Abstract

Photosensitivity reactions caused by cutaneous exposure or ingestion of certain substances are of four types: contact (topical) photoallergic, contact (topical) phototoxic, systemic photoallergic and systemic phototoxic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Norris PG, Hawk JLM (1990) Chronic actinic dermatitis: a unifying concept. Arch Dermatol 126: 376–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nater JP, De Groot AC (1985) Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology, 2 nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilkinson DS (1962) Patch test reactions to certain halogenated salicylanilides. Br J Dermatol 74: 302–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larsen W (1978) Photoallergy to musk ambrette found in aftershave lotion. Presented at the American Academy of Dermatology meeting, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cronin E (1984) Photosensitivity to musk ambrette. Contact Dermatitis 11: 88–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. LeRoy D, Dompmartin A (1989) Connubial photosensitivity to musk ambrette. Photodermatology 6: 137–139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindberg L, Larkö O, Roupe G (1986) Successful PUVA treatment for musk ambrette induced persistent light reaction. Photodermatology 3: 111–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cime de Castro JL, Pereira MA, Prates Nunes F, Pereira dos Santos A (1986) Successful treatment of a musk ambrette sensitive persistent light reactor with azathiaprine. Photodermatology 3: 241–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thune P (1984) Contact and photocontact allergy to sunscreens. Photodermatology 1: 5–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. English JSC, White IR, Cronin E (1987) Sensitivity to sunscreens. Contact Dermatitis 17: 159–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. English JSC, White IR (1986) Allergic contact dermatitis from isopropyl dibenzoylmethane. Contact Dermatitis 15: 94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schauder S, Ippen H (1986) Photoallergic and allergic contact dermatitis from dibenzoylmethanes. Photodermatology 3: 140–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schauder S, Ippen H (1988) Lichtschutzfilterhaltige Präparate in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1988. Z Hautkr 63: 707–763

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy GM, White IR (1987) Photoallergic contact dermatitis to 2-ethoxyethylp-methoxy cinnamate. Contact Dermatitis 16: 296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bruze M, Gruvberger B, Thune P (1988) Contact and photocontact allergy to glyceryl para-aminobenzoate. Photodermatology 5: 162–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J, Thomsen K (1976) Airborne contact dermatitis from Compositae oleoresins stimulates photodermatitis. Br J Dermatol 95: 613–620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. English JSC, Norris P, White I, Cronin E (1989) Variability in the clinical patterns of Compositae dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 121 [Suppl 34]: 27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Frain-Bell W, Johnson BE (1979) Contact sensitivity to chrysanthemum and the photosensitivity dermatitis and actinic reticuloid syndrome. Br J Dermatol 101: 491–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murphy GM, White IR, Hawk JLM (1990) Allergic airborne contact dermatitis to Compositae with photosensitivity — chronic actinic dermatitis in evolution. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 7: 38–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ducombs G, Benezra C, Talaga P et al. (1990) Patch testing with the “sesquiterpene lactone mix”: a marker for contact allergy to Compositae and other sesquiterpenelactone-containing plants. Contact Dermatitis to be published

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wrangsjö K, Ros AM, Wahlberg JE (1990) Contact allergy to Compositae plants in patients with summer exacerbating dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 22: 148–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Norris P, Hawk JLM, White IR (1988) Photoallergic contact dermatitis from fentichlor. Contact Dermatitis 18: 318–320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jansen CJ, Wennersten G, Rystedt I, Thune P, Brodthagen H (1982) The Scandinavian standard photopatch test procedure. Contact Dermatitis 8: 155–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thune P, Jansen C, Wennersten G, Rystedt I, Brodthagen H, McFadden N (1988) The Scandinavian multicenter photopatch study (1980–85) — final report. Photobiology 5: 261–269

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hölzle E, Plewig G, Lehmann P (1987) Photodermatoses — diagnostic procedures and their interpretation. Photodermatol 4: 109–114

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. De Leo VA, Harber LC (1986) Contact photodermatitis. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p. 465

    Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy GM, White IR, Cronin E (1990) Immediate and delayed photocontact dermatitis to isopropyl dibenzoylmethane. Contact Dermatitis 22: 129–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wennersten G, Thune P, Jansen CT, Brodthagen H (1986) Photocontact dermatitis: current status with emphasis on allergic contact photosensitivity ( CPS) occurrence, allergens, and practical phototesting. Semin Dermatol 5: 277–289

    Google Scholar 

  29. White IR (1983) A positive photopatch test with hydrochlorothiazide. Contact Dermatitis 9: 237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Frosch PJ, Weickel R (1989) Photokontaktallergie durch Benzydamin ( Tantum ). Hautarzt 40: 771–773

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dooms-Goossens A, Chrispels MT, De Veylden H, Roelandts R, Willems L, Degreif H (1987) Contact and photocontact sensitivity problems associated with thiourea and its derivatives: a review of the literature and case reports. Br J Dermatol 116: 573–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Takashima A, Yamatoto K et al. (1991) Allergic contact and photocontact dermatitis due to psoralens in patients with psoriasis treated with topical PUVA. Br J Dermatol 124: 37–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, I.R. (1992). Photopatch Testing. In: Rycroft, R.J.G., Menné, T., Frosch, P.J., Benezra, C. (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13119-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13119-0_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-13121-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-13119-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics