Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Switzerland and Europe’s Security Architecture: The Rocky Road from Isolation to Cooperation

  • Conference paper
Small States and Alliances

Abstract

Located in the heart of Europe, Switzerland has traditionally pursued a security policy based on the idea that the country is surrounded by enemies instead of friends. Until the early 1990s, army planners and security experts adhered to Mearsheimer’s “back to the future” scenario and prepared for a European continent falling apart. Now, at the end of the century, we know that things look brighter. The magistrates in Bern realize that they are loosing ground, especially with respect to the former Communist countries now eagerly applying for membership in the European Union (EU) and in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). They risk being caught in what can be called the neutrality trap: Because of the favorable European security environment the political elite is not willing to discuss the use of neutrality in post-Cold War Europe. But it is exactly the lack of that discussion that makes it impossible for Switzerland to fully benefit from the favorable environment. The outcome is a dilemma: NATO membership is possible, but not desirable. EU membership is desirable, but not possible.

I thank Jürg Martin Gabriel for stimulating discussions and helpful comments on earlier versions of the paper

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Heiko Borchert, Europas Sicherheitsarchitektur: Erfolgsfaktoren — Bestandsaufnahmen — Handlungsbedarf(Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999), pp. 71–152.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John Gerard Ruggie, Winning the Peace (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 20; John Gerard Ruggie, “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution”, in John Gerard Ruggie (ed.), Multilateralism Matters. The Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1993 ), pp. 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quoted in Ruggie, “Multilateralism: The Anatomy of an Institution”, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brian L. Job, “Matters of Multilateralism: Implications for Regional Conflict Management”, in David A. Lake and Patrick M. Morgan (eds.), Regional Orders. Building Security in a New World (University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997 ), p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Michael W. Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 80: 4 (1982), pp. 205–235;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colin H. Kahl, “Constructing a Separate Peace: Constructivism, Collective Liberal Identity, and Democratic Peace”, Security Studies, 8: 2 /3 (1999), pp. 94–144;

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce Russett, Grasping the Democratic Peace. Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a general introduction see: B. Guy Peters, Institutional Theory in Political Science. The “New Institutionalisms” (London, New York: Pinter, 1999 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robert E. Goodin, “Institutions and Their Design”, in Robert E. Goodin (ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 ), p. 16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Jarrod Wiener, “’Hegemonic’ Leadership. Naked Emperor or the Worship of False Gods?”, European Journal ofInternational Relations, 1: 2 (1997), pp. 219–243;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarrod Wiener, “Leadership, the United Nations, and the New World Order”, in Dimitri Bourantonis and Jarrod Wiener (eds.), The United Nations in the New World Order: The World Organization at Fifty (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995), pp. 41–63;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jarrod Wiener,Making Rules in the Uruguay Round of the GATT. A Study of International Leadership( Aldershot; Dartmouth, 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Most useful overviews of the vast literature on integration theory can be found in: Claus Giering, Europa zwischen Zweckverband und Superstaat (Bonn: Europa Union Verlag,1997);

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walter Mattli, The Logic of Regional Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 19–40;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Andrew Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe. Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998), pp. 18–85;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michael O’Neill, The Politics of European Integration. A Reader (London: Routledge, 1996 ), pp. 21–53, 122–144.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wayne Sandholtz and Alec Stone Sweet (eds.),European Integration and Supranational Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  18. For an up-to-date assessment see: Gordon Wilson (ed.), European force structures. Papers presented at a seminar held in Paris on 27 and 28 May 1999 (Paris: WEU Institute for Security Studies, 1999; Occasional Papers, no. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 31 May 1999, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Presidency Conclusions, Cologne European Council, SN 150/99,3/4 June 1999, Annex III: European Declaration on Strengthening Common European Policy on Security and Defence, pp. 33–42; Presidency Conclusions, Helsinki European Summit, SN 300/99,10/11 December 1999, Paras. 25–28 and Annex IV: Presidency reports on strengthening the common European policy on security and defence and on non-military crisis management of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Charles Grant, European defence post-Kosovo? (London: Centre for European Reform, 1999). The idea of defense convergence criteria was first proposed by François Heisbourg in the June/July edition of the Centre for European Reform Bulletin (http://www.cer.org.uk/news/n_6_1.htm). A similar idea was also put forward by French President Jacques Chirac in his speech before the North Atlantic Assembly on 20 October 1999. See: Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 21 October 1999, p. 5.

  22. It is not surprising that a transnational merger mania is growing in the aerospace industry because the national consolidation process is much more advanced in this sector than in maritime or in armored vehicles industries.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Neue ZürcherZeitung, 20 January 1999, p. 19; 15 October 1999, p. 21; 3 December 1999, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Implementing European Union Strategy on Defence-Related Industries, COM (97) 538 final, 12 November 1997; Presidency Conclusions, Cologne European Council, SN 150/99,3/4 June 1999, Annex III: European Declaration on Strengthening Common European Policy on Security and Defence, Para. 2. For an overview of what has been achieved so far see: Rudolf Agstner, “Europäische Rüstungspolitik. Drei Jahre Ad hoc-Gruppe des EU-Rates ‘Europäische Rüstungspolitik ’ (POLRAM)”, Österreichische Militärische Zeitschrift, 36: 5 (1998), pp. 505–516;

    Google Scholar 

  25. John Lovering, “Which Way to Turn? The European Defense IndustryAfter the Cold War”, in Ann R. Markusen and Sean S. Costigan (eds.), Arming the Future. A Defense Industry for the 21st Century ( New York: Council on Foreing Relations Press, 1999 ), pp. 334–370.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Washington Summit Communiqué, signed and issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Washington, D.C., 24 April 1999 (NAC-S(99)63), Paras. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. A revised edition of the Militärgesetz, which foresees international cooperation for training purposes will be discussed by the parliament in the year 2000. It is to be expected that political right-wing groups will launch a referendum that will be due in 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Andreas Wenger, Christoph Breitenmoser, and Patrick Lehmann, “Die Partnerschaft für den Frieden — eine Chance für die Schweiz”, in Bulletin zur schweizerischen Sicherheitspolitik (Zürich: Forschungsstelle für Sicherheitspolitik und Konfliktanalyse, 1997/8), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  29. For more information see: http://www.pfp.ethz.ch/index.cfm.

  30. Schweizerische Sicherheitspolitik im Wandel. Bericht 90 des Bundesrates an die Bundesversammlung über die Sicherheitspolitik der Schweiz, Bern, 1 October 1990 (subsequently called Report 90).

    Google Scholar 

  31. John J. Mearsheimer, “Back to the Future. Instability in Europe After the Cold War”, International Security, 15: 1 (1990), pp. 5–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Report 90, pp. 30–35. The other three scenarios were entitled: (1) Relapse into old confrontations and appearance of new dangers, (2) Low-intensity warfare, (3) Increasing vulnerability of modern societies. For a detailed critique of the Report 90 see: Jürg Martin Gabriel, “Europa und die schweizerische Sicherheitspolitik”, in Jürg Martin Gabriel (ed.), Sackgasse Neutralität (Zürich: vdf Verlag, 1997 ), pp. 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bericht über die Aussenpolitik der Schweiz in den 90er Jahren, Bern, 29 November 1993 (subsequently called Report 93).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Report 93, pp. 20–46.

    Google Scholar 

  35. For a critical assessment see: Jürg Martin Gabriel, “Neutralität für den Notfall: Der Bericht des Bundesrats zur Aussenpolitik der Schweiz in den 90er Jahren”, in Gabriel, Sackgasse Neutralität, pp. 129–158.

    Google Scholar 

  36. For a more detailed account see: Robert Diethelm, Die Schweiz und friedenserhaltende Operationen, 1920–1995 ( Bern: Paul Haupt Verlag, 1997 ), pp. 266–283.

    Google Scholar 

  37. For a more detailed account of Switzerland’s road to PfP see: Wenger/Breitenmoser/ Lehmann, “Die Partnerschaft für den Frieden–eine Chance für die Schweiz”, pp. 66–88.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sicherheit durch Kooperation. Bericht des Bundesrates an die Bundesversammlung über die Sicherheitspolitik der Schweiz, Bern, 7 June 1999 (subsequently called Report 2000 ).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bericht der Studienkommission für strategische Fragen, Bern, 26 February 1998 (available online at: http://www.vbs.admin.ch/internet/d/armee/pub/brunn/index.htm ).

  40. Sicherheit durch Kooperation. Politische Leitlinien für den sicherheitspolitischen Bericht, Bern, September 1998, p. 4 (own translation).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Weissbuch 1994 (Bonn: Bundesministerium der Verteidigung, 1994); Joint Vision 2010 (Washington, D.C.: Joint Chiefs of the Staff, 1996); Challenges and Opportunities Abroad. White Paper on Foreign Policy (Dublin: Department of Foreign Affairs, 1996); Sicherheitspolitisches Umfeld und Streitkräfteentwicklung II, (Wien: Landesverteidigungsakademie,1996); The Strategic Defence Review (London: The Stationery Office, 1998); Bericht über alle weiterführenden Optionen Österreichs im Bereich der Sicherheitspolitik (Wien, 1998 ).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Report 2000, pp. 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Report 2000, pp. 39–40 (own translation).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vreny Spoerry, “NATO-Beitritt der Schweiz?”,Allgemeine Schweizerische Militärzeitschrift, 165:4 (1999), p. 5 (own translation).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Report 2000, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Celeste A. Wallander and Robert O. Keohane, “Risk, Threat, and Security Institutions”, in Helga Haftendorn, Robert O. Keohane, and Celeste A. Wallander (eds.), Imperfect Unions. Security Institutions over Time and Space ( Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999 ), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wallander/Keohane, “Risk, Threat, and Security Institutions”, pp. 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  48. For an Austrian view see: Gustav Gustenau, “Das Neutralitätsdilemma. Die österreichische Sicht”, Allgemeine Schweizerische Militärzeitschrift, 165:6 (1999), p. 11; Erich Reiter, Neutralität oder NATO. Die sicherheitspolitischen Konsequenzen aus der europäischen Aufgabe Österreichs ( Graz: Verlag Styria, 1996 ).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Steven A. Cambone, A New Structure for National Security Policy Planning ( Westport: Praeger, 1998 ).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kurt R. Spillmann, “Sicherheitspolitik ist Chefsache der Exekutive. Überlegungen zur strategischen Neuausrichtung”, Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 15 March 1999, p. 11; Report 2000, pp. 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Recently, Michael C. Desch argued that it is easiest for civilians to control the military when they face primarily international (external) threats. However, after the end of the Cold War domestic risks and threats are more likely. According to Desch this makes it more difficult to control the military. Michael C. Desch, Civilian Control of the Military. The Changing Security Environment (Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999 ).

    Google Scholar 

  52. According to Article 3 of the Militärorganisationsverordnung (SR 510.21), the Geschäftsleitung consists of the Head of the Department, the Secretary General (both civilians), the Chief of the General Staff, the Chief of the Army, the Commanders of the Army Corps, the Chief of the Air Force (all military), and the Chief of the Armament Unit (civilian). With the exception of the four Commanders, the same people also meet in the Geschäftsleitungssausschuss. The new Geschäftsordnung of the Defense Department, which entered into force at the end of 1999, has only marginally improved the situation.

    Google Scholar 

  53. For more on this see http://www.defence.govt.nz/org/mod.htm.

  54. Verordnung über den Truppeneinsatz für den Ordnungsdienst (SR 513.71), Verordnung über den Truppeneinsatz für den Grenzpolizeidienst (SR 513.72), Verordnung über den Truppeneinsatz zum Schutz von Personen und Sachen (SR 513. 73 ).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 29 May 1999, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Personal interview with Karl Widmer, head of the project team “Civil Protection”, Bern, 20 October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Report 2000, p. 16, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  58. A cynic would argue that this argument makes NATO membership inevitable because the USA would hardly bash a fellow alliance member.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Press Release by the Finance Department, Bern, 27 September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Presidency Conclusions, Tampere European Council, 15/16 October, SN 200/99

    Google Scholar 

  61. Report 2000, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Commission sets out an ambitious accession strategy and proposes to open accession nego-tiations with six more candidate countries”, Brussels, 13 October 1999, IP/99/751; Presidency Conclusions, Helsinki European Council, 10/11 December 1999, SN 300/99, Paras. 10, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Heiko Borchert, “The Kosovo Conflict and the Swiss Contribution”, European Security, 8:4 (forthcoming). For more up-to-date information see the weekly ‘Balkan Newsletter’ issued by the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Justice and Police, and Defense, Civil Protection and Sports (http://www.eda.admin.ch/site/g/publikationen/balkanbulletin.htm).

  64. The Super-Puma helicopters returned to the Balkans in autumn 1999 as part of SWISSCOY.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 17 May 1999, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 24 June 1999, p. 13; 16 October 1999, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Balkan Bulletin, dated 8 October 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  68. On 11 August, 1999 Swiss state attorney Carla Del Ponte was appointed Prosecutor of the ICTY.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 24 June 1999, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Balkan Bulletin, dated 26 November 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 22 May 1999, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 20 May, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Before the decisions to support EU’s sanctions were taken there were differences within the Department of Foreign Affairs. While the Political Direction argued in favor of full participation the Direction for International Law had its doubts whether such a decision would be compatible with the law of neutrality. See: Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 17 May 1999, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Press release by the Department of Police and Justice, 8 April 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Figures by the UNCHR, dated 3 June 1999, quoted in the “Balkan Newsletter”, dated 4 June 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 12 May 1999, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  77. For a broad assessment see: Kurt R. Spillmann, Andreas Wenger, and Marcel Mäder, “Interoperabilität–Eckwert für die Armee XXI. Voraussetzung für alle Optionen militärischer Kooperation”,Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 19 October 1999, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Walter Knutti, “Task Force ‘ALBA’. Humanitärer Einsatz der Luftwaffe auf dem Balkan”, Allgemeine Schweizerische Militärzeitschrift, 165: 9 (1999), p. 13–14;

    Google Scholar 

  79. Arthur Friedrich Maiwald, “Internationale Rundschau: Schweiz”, Österreichische Militärische Zeitschrift, 37:4 (1999), pp. 521–525.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 17 May 1999, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Jahresbericht des Bundesrates über die Teilnahme der Schweiz an der Partnerschaft für den Frieden, Bern, April 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Heiko Borchert and Jürg Martin Gabriel, “Die Schweizer Armee und die europäische Sicherheitsordnung: Herausforderungen und Aufträge”, in Thomas Cottier and Alwin R. Kopse (eds.), Der Beitritt der Schweiz zur Europäischen Union ( Zürich: Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag, 1998 ), pp. 629.

    Google Scholar 

  83. The results of a representative recent opinion poll (sample: about 2’200 persons) show that 69% of the Swiss population are in favor of the country approaching the EU. 57% would even back the country’s EU membership. While 47% of the Swiss also favor closer contacts with NATO, only 25 to 30% would back Switzerland’s NATO membership. See: Neue Zürcher Zeitung, 18 December 1999, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Heiko Borchert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Militärwissenschaftliches Büro, Bundesministeriums für Landesverteidigung, Stiftgasse 2a, 1070, Vienna, Austria

    Erich Reiter

  2. Österreichisches Institut, Internationale Politik, Operngasse 20 B, 1040, Vienna, Austria

    Heinz Gärtner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Borchert, H. (2001). Switzerland and Europe’s Security Architecture: The Rocky Road from Isolation to Cooperation. In: Reiter, E., Gärtner, H. (eds) Small States and Alliances. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13000-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-13000-1_13

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2492-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-13000-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation