Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Contemporary Economics ((CONTEMPORARY))

Zusammenfassung

Ziel des Kapitels „Spieltheorie und Experimentelle Wirtschaftsforschung“ ist es, Anwendungsmöglichkeiten der spieltheoretischen und der experimentellen Methoden in der wirtschaftspolitischen Beratung im Speziellen und in der wissenschaftlichen Beratung im Allgemeinen aufzuzeigen. Dies erfolgt an ausgewählten Themengebieten, die wir zum einen als dafür geeignet halten und denen wir zum anderen unser Forschungsinteresse widmen. Diese Darstellung ist in keinem Fall umfassend. So wird beispielsweise auf die Diskussion der kooperativen Spieltheorie und deren Anwendungsmöglichkeiten verzichtet. Auch bei den von uns erwähnten Anwendungsgebieten der nicht-kooperativen Theorie werden nicht alle bisher bekannten Problemstellungen angesprochen, was durch die Beschränkung des Umfangs der Arbeit auch nicht möglich ist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur zu Kapitel 9

  • Arrow, K. (1985), The economics of agency, in: Pratt, J., R. Zeckhauser (ed.): Principals and Agents, The Structure of Business, Boston MA: Harvard Business School Press, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, C., S.K. Beminghaus (1999), Strategische Preispolitik in der Industrie für Meß-and Regelungstechnik — Eine spieltheoretische Fallstudie, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, J., L. Daley, J. Dickhaut, J. O’Brien (1992), Moral hazard and risk sharing, Experimental evidence, in: Marc Isaac (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 5, 1–34, Greenwich: JAI Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beminghaus, S.K., K.-M. Ehrhart, C. Keser (1998), Conventions and local interaction structures, Experimental evidence, working paper 98/12, SFB 504, University of Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninghaus, S.K., U. Schwalbe (1996a), Evolution, interaction, and Nash equilibria, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninghaus, S.K., U. Schwalbe (1996b), Conventions, local interaction, and automata networks, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 297–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolle, F. (1998), Frequency auctions: How they should be shaped and how they should not be shaped, Frankfurt ( Oder ), Europa-Universität Viadrina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, R., A. Orleans (1992), How do conventions envolve?, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brams, S.J. (1994), Voting procedures, in: Aumann, R. J., S. Hart (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory, Vol. 2, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 1055–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A.L., B.J. Nalebuff (1995), The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy, Harvard Business Review, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., K. Weigelt (1988), Experimental tests of a sequential equilibrium reputation model, Econometrica, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A. (1998), The ratchet principle in a principal agent game with unknown costs: an experimental analysis, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 37, 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W.M., J.C. Miller III (1993), Budget processes and spending growth, William and Mary Law Review, 31, 1021–1046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramton, P. (1997), The FCC spectrum auctions: An early assessment, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6, No 3, Special Issue: Market Design and the Spectrum Auctions, 431–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong, D., R. Forsythe, R. Lundholm (1985), Ripoffs, lemons, and reputation formation in agency relationships: A laboratory market study, Journal of Finance 40, 809–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1982), Recent developments in oligopoly theory, American Economic Review, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, K.-M. (1997), Kollektivgut-Spiele in diskreter und stetiger Zeit: Theorie und Experimente, Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, K.-M., R. Gardner, J. von Hagen, C. Keser (1999), Budget processes: Theory and experimental evidence, University of Karlsruhe, University of Indiana, ZEI (Bonn), and CIRANO (Montreal).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (1992), Testing Principal-Agent-Theory, in: Mark Isaac (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 5, 35–60, Greenwich, JAI Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eshel, I., E. Sansone„ A. Shaked (1996), Evolutionary dynamics of populations with a local interaction structure, mimeo, University of Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., S. Gächter, G. Kirchsteiger (1997), Reciprocity as a contract enforcement device–Experimental evidence, Econometrica 65, 833–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J., K. Krehbiel (1987), The budget process and the size of the budget, American Journal of Political Science, 31, 296–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., F. Oberholzer-Gee (1997), The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding out, American Economic Review Vol. 87, 746–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fucini, J.J., S. Fucini (1990), Working for the Japanese, New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R., J. von Hagen (1997), Sequencing and the size of the budget: Experimental evidence in: Albers W., W. Guth, P. Hammerstein, B. Moldavanu, E. van Damme (eds.), Understanding strategic interaction: Essays in honor of Reinhard Selten, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968), The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, 1234–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y.J., J.H. Kagel, D. Levin (1990), On the existence of predatory pricing: An experimental study of reputation and entry deterrence in the chain store game, mimeo, University of Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandori, M., G.J. Mailath, R. Rob (1993), Learning, mutation, and long run equilibria in games, Econometrica, 61, 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keser, C., K.-M. Ehrhart, S.K. Berninghaus (1998), Coordination and local interaction: Experimental evidence, Economics Letters, 58, 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuter, A., L. Nett (1997), ERMES-auction in Germany: First simultaneous multiple-round auction in the European telecommunications market, Telecommunication Policy, 21, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuter, A., L. Nett, U. Stumpf (1996), Regeln für das Verfahren zur Versteigerung von ERMES-Lizenzen/Frequenzen sowie regionaler ERMES-Frequenzen, Diskussionsbeiträge, 165, Bad Honnef, Wissenschaftliches Institut für Kommunikationsdienste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G.B. (1998), Supermajority voting requirements for tax increases: Evidence from the States, University of Wisconsin, mimeograph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D.M., R. Wilson (1982), Reputation and imperfect information, Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J.O. (1995), Public Goods: A survey of experimental research, in: Kagel, J.H., A.E. Roth (eds.), The handbook of experimental economics, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J.O., D. Porter, A. Rangel (1997). Experiments testing multiobject allocation mechanisms, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6, No 3, Special Issue: Market Design and the Spectrum Auctions, 639–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAffee, R.P. J. McMillan (1996), Analyzing the airwaves auction, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (1), 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R.D. (1979), General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models, Econometrica, 47, 1085–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., J. Roberts (1982), Predation, reputation and entry deterrence, Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, J. (1965), The logic of collective action, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development ( 1987 ), The control and management of government expenditure, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.R. (1997), Laboratory experimental testbeds: Application to the PCS auction, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 6, No 3, Special Issue: Market Design and the Spectrum Auctions, 605–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salop, S. (1979), Strategic entry deterrence, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 335–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, L. (1997), Evolutinary games, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1975), Re-examination of the perfectness concept of equilibrium points in extensive games, International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 25–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1978), The chain store paradox, Theory and Decision, 9, 127–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. (1979), Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship, Bell Journal of Economics 10, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E., E. Talvi, and A. Grisanti (1997), Institutional arrangements and fiscal performance: The Latin American experience, ZEI (Bonn).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (1999), Survey Pay, May 8`h.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1988), The theory of industrial organization, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme, E. (1991), Stability and perfection of Nash equilibria, zweite, überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hagen, J., I. Harden (1996), Budget processes and commitment to fiscal discipline, IMF Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hagen, J., K.-M. Ehrhart (1998), A voting game, Group exercise at the Conference on budgetary processes and the analysis and management of public expenditures, World Bank, Washington, June 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, J. (1995), Umweltökonomik, 3. Aufl., Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., M. Trevor (1983), Under Japanese management: The experience of British workers, London, Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildaysky, A. (1975), Budgeting, Oxford, Transaction publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, H.P. (1998), Individual strategy and social structure: an evolutionary theory of institutions, Princeton, Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berninghaus, S.K., Ehrhart, KM., Kirstein, A., Seifert, S. (2002). Spieltheorie und experimentelle Ökonomie. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Neue Entwicklungen in der Wirtschaftswissenschaft. Studies in Contemporary Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12571-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12571-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1437-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12571-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics