Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Contemporary Economics ((CONTEMPORARY))

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten zwanzig Jahren hat sich die Wettbewerbssituation auf den internationalen Märkten erheblich verändert. Die bislang großen drei Volkswirtschaften des Welthandels (USA, Japan, EU) sehen sich einer wachsenden Konkurrenz aus verschiedenen Regionen der Erde gegenüber. Die Güter-, Arbeits- und insbesondere die Kapitalmärkte sind im Rahmen der Globalisierung durch eine zunehmende Integration gekennzeichnet. Die traditionellen Industriesektoren sind nicht länger Garanten fir einen dauerhaften, arbeitsplatzschaffenden Wachstumsprozess. Aufgrund der Entwicklungen auf dem Gebiet der Informations- und Kornmunikationstechnologien (IKT) ist die Verlagerung von Produktionsstätten ins Ausland einfacher geworden. Darüber hinaus ist durch den Transformationsprozess in Osteuropa ein großes Arbeitskräftepotential verfügbar geworden.

„Many readers who are literate in economics will remember the special meaning of the Keynesian dictum that in the long run we are all dead .... American economist Herbert Stein, after a term of service in Washington, wrote ruefully in 1979, ‘we woke up to discover that we were living in the long run, and were suffering for our failure to look after it’.“

(Fischer, 1996, 10)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur zu Kapitel 7

  • Abramovitz, M. (1986), Catching up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind, Journal of Economic History, 46, 385 — 406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adis, A, H.B. Chua (1997), Thy Neighbor’s Curse: Regional Instability and Growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 279–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., E. Caroli, C. Garcia-Peflalosa (1999), Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories, Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1615–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., P. Howitt (1992), A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction, Econometrica, 60, 323–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, P., P. Howitt (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmend, S., J.H. Rogers (2000), Inflation and the Great Ratios: Long term Evidence from the U.S., Journal of Monetary Economics, 45, 3–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A, R. Perotti (1996), Income Distribution, Political Instability and Investment, European Economic Review, 81, 1170–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A, D. Rodrik (1994), Distribution Policies and Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 465–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., S. Ötzler, N. Roubini, P. Swagel (1996), Political Instability and Economic Growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. (1962), The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach S., G. Erber (1999), Electronic Commerce: A Need for Regulation?, in: Freer Trade in the Next Decade. The Millenium Round in the World Trade Organization, Hrsg. K.G. Deutsch, B. Speyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranzini, M., R. Scazzieri (Hrsg.) (1990), The Economic Theory of Structure and Change, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1996a), Getting it Right.Markets and Choices in a Free Society, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1996b), Democracy and Growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1996c), Institutions and Growth, an Introductory Essay, 1, 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1999). Inequality, Growth, and Investment, NBER Working Paper 7038, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J., X. Sala-i-Martin (1995), Economic Growth, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benabou, R. (1996), Inequality and Growth, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 11–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, J., A. Rustichini (1996), Social Conflict and Growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 125–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertola, G. (1993), Factor Shares and Savings in Endogenous Growth, American Economic Review, 83, 1184–1198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D.G., M.J. Slaugther (1999), The Causes and Consequences of Changing Income Inequality, in: Growing Apart, The Causes and Consequences of Global Wage Inequality, Hrsg. Fishlow, Parker, New York, 67–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekholt, P., J. Clark, P. Sowden (1998), An International Comparative Study on Inititatives to Build, Develop and Support „Kompetenzzentren“, in Zusab. mit J. Niehoff, Bericht für das BMBF, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMBF (1999), Zur technologischen Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands, Zusammenfassender Endbericht, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMFT (1993), Deutscher Delphibericht zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMWT, BMBF (1999), Innovation und Arbeitsplätze in der Informationsgesellschaft des 21. Jahrhunderts, Aktionsprogramm der Bundesregierung, Berlin-Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • BMWi (1998), Benchmarking–Zum Entwicklungsstand der Informationsgesellschaft und zur Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der informations-und kommunikationstechnischen Industrie am Standort Deutschland, Bericcht der Prognos AG, Basel-Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A., B. Nalebuff (1996) Coopetition, kooperatives Konkurrieren, Frankfurt/Main–New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T., M. Traitenberg (1995), General purpose technologies: „Engines of Growth“, Journal of Econometrics, 65, 83–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brezis, E.S., P.R. Krugman (1997), Technology and the Life Cycle of Cities, Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., S. Yang (1996), Information Technology and Productivity: A Review of the Literature, Advances in Computers, 43, 179–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buigues, P., A. Jacquemin, A. Sapir (Hrsg.) (1995), European Policies on Competition, Trade and Industry: Conflict and Complementarities, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clague, C., Keefer, S. Knack, M. Olson (1996), Property and Contract Rights in Autocracies and Democracies, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 243–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clague, C., Keefer, S. Knack, M. Olson (1999), Contract Intensive Money: Contract Enforcement, Property Rights, and Economic Performance, Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 185–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S.J. (1998), A Positive Theory of Income Redistribution, Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durham, J.B. (1999), Economic Growth and Political Regimes, Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 81–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EITO (1999), European Information Technology Observatory, Mainz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, G., H. Hagemann, S. Seiter (1998), Zukunftsperspektiven Deutschlands im internationalen Wettbewerb. Industriepolitische Implikationen der Neuen Wachstumstheorie, Würzburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erber, G., H. Hagemann, S. Seiter (1999), Wachstums-und beschäftigungspolitische Implikationen des Informations-und Kommunikationssektors, Berlin und Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-Kommission (1990), Industriepolitik in einem offenen und wettbewerbsorientierten Umfeld. Ansätze für ein Gemeinschaftskonzept, Brüssel.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-Kommission (1993), Wachstum, Wettbewerbsfähigkeit, Beschäftigung. Herausforderungen der Gegenwart und Wege ins 21. Jahrhundert, Weißbuch, Luxemburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eu-Kommission (1994), Eine Politik der industriellen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit für die Europäischen Union, Brüssel.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-Kommission (2000), Shaping the New Europe, Strategic Objectives 2000–2005, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2000) 154 final, Brüssel, 9. 2. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • EZB (1999), Auf Preisstabilität ausgerichtete Politik und die Entwicklung der langfristigen Realzinsen in den neunziger Jahren, Monatsbericht der Europäischen Zentralbank, November 1999, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1999), The Need for Innovation-Based growth in Europe, Challenge, 42, Sept.-Okt., 63–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D.H. (1996), The Great Wave, Price Revolutions and the Rhythm of History, Oxford–New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishlow, A., K. Parker (1999), Growing Apart, The Causes and Consequences of Global Wage Inequality, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, R. (1999), Catching Up with the economy, American Economic Review, 89, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FT (2000a), EU-leaders agree sweeping reforms to create jobs, Financial Times, 25./26. 3. 2000, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • FT (2000b), Broadband internet access for all Swedes in two years, Financial Times, 30.2. 2000, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, O.L. jr. (1995), Loosing Time: The Industrial Policy Debate, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M., E. Helpman (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, D. (1990), The Economics of Political Violence, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, H., S. Seiter (1999), `Okun’s Law’, und `Verdoorn’s Law’, in: P.O’Hara

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of Political Economy, London, Bd. II, 819–821 und 1228–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, D. (1973), Mass Political Violence: A Cross-sectional Analysis, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1973), Capital and Time. A neo — Austrian Theory, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (Hrsg.) (1998), General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, W. (1931), Stadien und Typen der Industrialisierung, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W. (1998), Investment and Growth, in S. Strom, Hrsg., Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century, Cambridge, 204–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W., K.J. Stiroh (1999). Information Technology and Growth, Harvard University, (mimeographed).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1966), Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth in the United Kingdom, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapstein, E.B. (1996), Workers and the World Economy, Foreign Affairs, 75, May/June, 16–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., J. Thomson (1998), Why Isn’t Convergence Instantaneous? Young Workers

    Google Scholar 

  • Old Workers, and gradual Adjustment, Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1994), Peddling Prosperity. Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1995), Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 327–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1996), First, Do No Harm, Foreign Affairs, 75, July/August, 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1955), Economic Growth and Income Inequality, American Economic Review, 45, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landesmann, M., Scazzieri, R. (Hrsg.) (1996), Production and Economic Dynamics, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightfood, W. (2000), The Bane of Budget Surpluses, The Wall Street Journal Europe, 2. 2. 2000, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindlar, L. (1997), Das missverstandene Wirtschaftswunder, Westdeutschland und die west-europäischen Nachkriegsprosperität, Tübingen, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, D. (1981), Intergenerational Transfer and the Distribution of Earning, Econometrica, 49, 843–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A. (1976), The Path of Economic Growth, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. jr. (1988), On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. jr. (1993), Making a Miracle, Econometrica, 2, 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995), Corruption and Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monopolkommission (1992), Wettbewerbspolitik oder Industriepolitik, Hautpbericht 1990/91, Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morand, O.F. (1999), Endogenous Fertility, Income Distribution, and Growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 4, 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motohashi, K. (1998), Institutional Arrangement for Access to Confidential Micro-Level Data in OECD Countries, STI-Working Paper 1998/3, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neef, D. (Hrsg.) (1998), The Knowledge Economy, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGI (1998), NGI Implementation Plan, National Coordination Office for Computing, Information, and Communications, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1994), The OECD Jobs Study, Evidence and Explanations. Part I: Labor Market Trends and Underlying Forces of Change, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1999), Growth Project, DSTI/IND/STP/ICCP (99)1, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orazem, P., L. Tesfatsion (1997), Macrodynamic Implications of Income-Transfer Policies for Human Capital Investment and School Effort, Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 305–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L.L. (1981), Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L.L. (1993), Structural Economic Dynamics, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, R. (1993), Political Equilibrium, Income Distribution and Growth, Review of Economic Studies, 60, 755–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., G. Tabellini (1994), Is Inequality Harmful for Growth; Theory and Evidence, American Economic Review, 84, 600–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (1997), The Dynamics of the Wealth Distribution and Interest Rates with Credit Rationing, Review of Economic Studies, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, R. (2000), 2000–2005: Shaping the New Europe, Rede vor dem Europäischen Parlament, Straßburg, 15. 2. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D.T. (1997), Empirics of Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization and Convergence Clubs, Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 27–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R.E. (1991), The Work of Nations–Preparing Ourselves for the 21st Century-Capitalism, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1994), The Origins of Endogenous Growth, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996a), The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis, Economic Journal, 106, 1019–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996b), A Positive Theory of Social Security, Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, I. (1992), EG-Integration: Industrie-versus Wettbewerbspolitik, Wirtschaftsdienst, Nr. 12, 628–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P., Leyden, P., Hyatt, J. (1999), The Long Boom, A Vision for the Coming Age of Prosperity, Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sichel, D.E. (1997), The Computer Revolution. An Economic Perspective, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1984), Mr. Hicks and the Classics, in: D.A. Collard. (Hrsg.), Economic Theory and Hicksian Themes, Oxford, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R.M. (1994), Perspectives on Growth Theory, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Paul, G, T. Verdier (1997), Power, Distributive Conflicts, and Multiple Growth Paths, Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 155–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White Conference on the New Economy (2000), http://www.whitehouse.eov/wh/new/ html/20000405-a.html, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornell, A. (1996), Economic Growth and Decline with Endogenous Property Rights, Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 219–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurow, L.C. (1997), Needed: A New System of Intellectual Property Rights, Harvard Business Review, Sep.-Oct., 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veneris, Y, D. Gupta (1986), Income Distribution and Sociopolitical Instability as Determinants of Savings: A Cross Sectional Model, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 873–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A. (1994), North-South Trade, Employment and Inequality: Changing Futures in a Skill-driven World, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erber, G., Hagemann, H. (2002). Wachstum, Strukturwandel und Beschäftigung. In: Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Neue Entwicklungen in der Wirtschaftswissenschaft. Studies in Contemporary Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12571-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12571-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1437-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12571-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics