Skip to main content
  • 101 Accesses

Abstract

What has Operations Research to do with ethics? Or, more generally, what has science to do with ethics? Should not science be free or at least intellectually be separable from moral norms as Max Weber [Weber] postulated? Indeed, being aware that Operations Research (OR) may be identified as the science of formal decision making, these questions are of particular significance for this discipline. Formal decision making has, in a very general way, to do with norms, and these norms are not simply exogenously given but essential objects of investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K.J. (1963). “Social Choice and Individual Values”. 2nd ed., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J., Raynaud, H. (1986). “Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision Making”. MIT Press, Cambridge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). “Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns”. 2 Bände, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1987). “Critique of Judgement”. Hackett Publ. Comp. Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiß, Ch. (1987). “On a formalization of the process of quantitative model building”. In: European Journal of Operational Research 29, pp 24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiß, Ch. (1992). “Planung 2: Konzepte der Prozeß-und Modellgestaltung”. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneeweiß, Ch. (1999). “Hierarchies in Distributed Decision Making”. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). “Critical Heuristics of Social Planning. A New Approach to Practical Philosophy”. Bern, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1973). “Der Sinn der ‘Wertfreiheit’ der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften”. In: Gesammelte Aufsätze der Wissenschaftslehre, 4. Aufl., Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneeweiss, C. (1999). Ethics and Operations Research. In: Leopold-Wildburger, U., Feichtinger, G., Kistner, KP. (eds) Modelling and Decisions in Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12519-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12519-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2462-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12519-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics