Advertisement

Trees IV pp 389-406 | Cite as

Pinus pinea L. (Stone Pine) and Pinus halepensis Mill. (Aleppo Pine)

  • S. Diamantoglou
  • G. P. Banilas
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 35)

Abstract

Pinus is the largest and most important genus of conifers, comprising approximately 95 species widely scattered over the northern hemisphere (Preston 1989).

Keywords

Somatic Embryo Somatic Embryogenesis Activate Charcoal Embryogenic Callus Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdullah AA, Yeoman MM, Grace J (1985) In vitro adventitious shoot formation from embryonic and cotyledonary tissues of Pinus brutia Ten. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 5: 35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Attree SM, Fowke LC (1991) Micropropagation through somatic embryogenesis in conifers. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol 17. Hi-tech and micropropagation I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 53–70Google Scholar
  3. Attree SM, Dunstan DI, Fowke LC (1991) White spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss] and Black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill) B.S.P.]. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol 16. Trees III. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 423–445Google Scholar
  4. Bajaj YPS (ed) (1991) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol 16. Trees III. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bariteau M (1992) Variabilité géographique et adaption aux contraintes du milieu mediterranéen des pins de la section halepensis: résultats (provisoires) d’un essai en plantations comparatives en France. Ann Sci For 49: 261–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chesick EE, Bergmann BA (1991) Jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol 16. Trees III. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 241–253Google Scholar
  7. Daskalakou EN, Thanos CA (1995) Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) postfire regeneration: the role of canopy and soil seed banks. Int J Wildland Fire (in press)Google Scholar
  8. Diamantoglou S, Panagopoulos I, Munoz-Ferriz A, Rhizopoulou S (1990) In vitro studies of embryo growth, callus formation and multiple bud induction of Pinus pinea L. J Plant Physiol 137: 58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diner AM, Karnosky DF (1987) Differential responses of two conifers to in vitro inoculation with Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Eur J For Pathol 17: 211–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finer JJ, Kriebel HB, Becwar MR (1989) Initiation of embryogenic callus and suspension cultures of eastern White pine (Pinus strobus L.) Plant Cell Rep 8: 203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher (1986) Performance of Pinus halepensis/brutia group pines in southern New Mexico. For Ecol Manage 16 (1–4): 403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gresshoff PM, Doy CH (1972) Development and differentiation of haploid Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Planta 107: 161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1985) Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas fir and sugar pine. Plant Cell Rep 4: 177–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gupta PK, Durzan DJ (1986) Somatic polyembryogenesis from callus of mature sugar pine embryos. Biotechnology 4: 643–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jain SM, Dong N, Newton RJ (1989) Somatic embryogenesis in slash pine (Pinus elliottii) from immature embryos cultured in vitro. Plant Sci 65: 233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kailidis DS, Georgevits RP (1974) The forest insects of Greece: Aristotelion University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Sci Ann Agric For School 16: 235–271Google Scholar
  17. Konar RN, Singh MN (1980) Induction of shoot from tissue cultures of Pinus wallichiana. Z Pflanzenphysiol 99: 173–177Google Scholar
  18. Martinez-Honduvilla CJ, Santos-Ruiz A (1978) Germination inhibitors in the pine seed coat. Planta 141: 141–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mohammed GH, Vidaver WE (1988) Root production and plantlet development in tissue-cultured conifers. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 14: 137–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nagmani R, Beckwar MR, Wann SR (1987) Single-cell origin and development of somatic embryos in Picea abies (L.) Karst. (Norway spruce) and P. glauca (Moench) Voss (White spruce). Plant Cell Rep 6: 157–159Google Scholar
  22. Pantidou ME (1973) Fungus-host index for Greece. Benaki Phytopathol Inst, Kiphissia-AthensGoogle Scholar
  23. Preston RJ (1989) North American trees, 4th edn. Iowa State Univ Press, Ames, IowaGoogle Scholar
  24. Renfroe MH, Berlyn GP (1985) Variation in nuclear DNA content in Pinus taeda L. tissue cultures of diploid origin. J Plant Physiol 121: 131: 139Google Scholar
  25. Schopf N, Avtzis N (1987) Die Bedeutung von Nadelinhaltsstoffen für die Disposition von fünf Kiefernarten gegenüber Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Schiff.). J Appl Entomol 103: 340–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwarz OJ, Schlarbaum SE, Beaty RM (1988) Plantlet regeneration from mature zygotic embryos of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). Plant Cell Rep 7: 174–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sommer HE, Brown CL, Kormanik (1975) Differentiation of plantlets in longleaf Pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) tissue cultured in vitro. Bot Gaz 136(2) : 196–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spencer J (1985) Dry country pines: Provenance evaluation of the Pinus halepensis-P. brutia complex in the semi-arid region of south-east Australia. Aust For Res 15: 263–279Google Scholar
  29. Tautorus TE, Fowke LC, Dunstan DI (1991) Somatic embryogenesis in conifers. Can J Bot 69: 1873–1899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thanos CA, Skordilis A (1987) The effects of light, temperature and osmotic stress on the germination of Pinus halepensis and Pinus brutia seeds. Seed Sci Technol 15: 163–174Google Scholar
  31. Von Arnold S, Eriksson T (1981) In vitro studies of adventitious shoot formation in Pinus contorta. Can J Bot 59: 870–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weatherhead MA, Burdon J, Henshaw GG (1979) Effects of activated charcoal as an additive to plant tissue culture media, Part 2. Z Pflanzenphysiol 94: 339–405Google Scholar
  33. Weinstein A (1989) Provenance evaluation of Pinus halepensis, Pinus brutia and Pinus eldarica in Israel. For Ecol Manage 26: 215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Diamantoglou
  • G. P. Banilas
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of General Botany, Department of BiologyUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations