Abstract
The question concerning neo-classical economics is: How can an economy inhabited by self-regarding agents operate in an efficient and orderly manner? Kenneth Arrow’s General Equilibrium Theory provides a mathematically formalized answer to this question. It is a coherent system and when economic agents act rationally, general equilibrium and Pareto Optimality obtain. In a sense General Equilibrium Theory acts as a normative ideal social order guaranteeing that humans can fulfill their nature as beings of utility in a self-interested manner, while providing for a socially optimal outcome. However the model, while coherent, is divorced from the realities of the capitalist economy. Specifically, it is a model of simple reproduction and as such does not account for the structural logic of capitalist production. The purpose of this paper is twofold. In the first instance I shall articulate an alternative approach to economic theory, based upon a fundamentally different ontological and epistemological basis provided by Karl Marx’s method and model of accumulation heuristically1 interpreted through Roy Bhaskar’s Critical Realism, in such a way that accounts for and surpasses the methodological weaknesses of neo-classical economics. The second is to disrupt the normative ideal social order by including the structural logic of capitalist production through the employment of Marx’s modl of “capital accumulation.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrow, Kenneth: “Economic Equilibrium,” and “Pareto Efficiency With Costly Transfers.” General Equilibrium Collected Papers: Volume 2, Oxford (Basil Blackwell) 1983.
For a list of the axioms see Kenneth J. Arrow, F.H. Hahn: General Competitive Analysis, San Francisco (Holden-Day, Inc. ), 1971, 78–79.
David Gauthier: Morals by Agreement,New York (Oxford University Press) 1986, p. 83.
Bhaskar, Roy: Realist Theory of Science, New Jersey (Humanities Press Inc.) 1978, pp. 36–37.
Marx, Karl: Grundrisse: Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy, ed. by Quintin Hoare and translated by Martin Nicolaus. Baltimore (Penguin Books) 1973, p. 156.
Marx, Karl: Preface and Introduction to a Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, Peking (Foreign Language Press) 1976, p. 4.
Marx, Karl: Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production, ed. by Frederick Engels, New York (International Publishers) 1987 p. 72.
Marx, Karl: Theories of Surplus Value, trans. by G.A. Bonner and Emile Burns, New York (International Publishers) 1952, p. 99.
Christopher J. Arthur: “Hegel’s Logic and Marx’s Capital”. in Fred Mosley (Ed.) Marx’s Method in Capital, New Jersey (Humanities Press International Inc.) 1993 ) p. 83.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Badeen, D. (2004). General Equilibrium Theory as Normative Ideal Social Order. In: Hodgson, B. (eds) The Invisible Hand and the Common Good. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10347-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10347-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-06109-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10347-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive