Skip to main content

Molecular Aspects of Allergic Contact Dermatitis

  • Chapter
Textbook of Contact Dermatitis

Abstract

The skin sensitization reaction to a chemical is a multistep process with two principal stages:

  1. 1.

    A state of sensitization to a chemical is induced. This may be on first exposure to the chemical or only after many exposures.

  2. 2.

    A sensitization response is elicited. This happens when a subject sensitive to a given chemical is exposed to, or challenged with, the same or a related chemical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer H, Watkins RC, Kurtz AP, Byck JS, Dawson CR (1967) Delayed contact sensitivity to catechols. J Immunol 99: 307–375

    Google Scholar 

  2. Corbett MD, Billets S (1975) Characterization of poison oak urushiol. J Pharm Sci 64: 1715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Landsteiner K, Jacobs J (1936) Studies on the sensitization of animals with simple chemical compounds. J Exp Med 64: 625–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lepoittevin JP, Berl V (1997) Chemical basis. In: Lepoittevin JP, Basketter DA, Goossens A, Karlberg AT (eds) Allergic contact dermatitis: the molecular basis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 19–42

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lepoittevin I-P, Benezra C (1992) 13C-Enriched methylalkanesulfonates: new lipophilic methylating agents for the identification of nucleophilic amino acids of protein by NMR. Tetrahedron Lett 33: 3875–3878

    Google Scholar 

  6. Franot C, Benezra C, Lepoittevin J-P (1993) Synthesis and interaction studies of 13C labeled lactone derivatives with a model protein using 13 C NMR. Biorg Med Chem 1: 389–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ritz HL, Connor DS, Sauter ED (1975) Contact sensitization of guinea-pigs with unsaturated and halogenated sultones. Contact Dermatitis 1: 349–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodwin BFJ, Roberts DW, Williams DL, Johnson AW (1983) Relationships between skin sensitization potential of saturated and unsaturated sultones. In: Gibson GG, Hubbard R, Parke DV (eds) Immunotoxicology. Academic, London, pp 443–448

    Google Scholar 

  9. Magnusson B, Gilje 0. (1973) Allergic contact dermatitis from dishwashing liquid containing lauryl ether sulfate. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 53: 136–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Romagnoli P, Labahrdt AM, Sinigaglia F (1991) Selective interaction of nickel with an MHC bound peptide. EMBO J 10: 1303–1306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmidt R, Kahn L, Chung L Y (1990) Are free radicals and quinones the haptenic species derived from urushiols and other contact allergenic mono- and dihydric alkylbenzenes? The significance of NADH, glutathione and redox cycling in the skin. Arch Dermatol Res 282: 56–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barratt M D, Basketter DA (1992) Possible origin of the skin sensitization potential of eugenol and related compounds. Contact Dermatitis 27: 98–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gäfvert E, Shao L P, Karlb erg A-T, Nilsson U, Nilsson J L G (1994) Contact allergy to resin acid hydroperoxides. Hapten binding via free radicals and epoxides. Chem Res Toxicol 7: 260–266

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lepoittevin J-P, Karlberg A-T (1994) Interaction of allergenic hydroperoxides with proteins: a radical mechanism. Chem Res Toxicol 7: 130–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bertrand F, Basketter DA, Roberts DW, Lepoittevin J-P (1997) Skin sensitization to eugenol and isoeugenol in mice: possible metabolic pathways involving ortho-quinone and quinone methide intermediates. Chem Res Toxicol 10: 335–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Merk HF (1997) Skin metabolism. In: Lepoittevin JP, Basketter DA, Goossens A, Karlberg AT (eds) Allergic contact dermatitis: the molecular basis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 68–80

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dupuis G (1979) Studies of poison ivy. In vitro lymphocytes transformation by urushiol protein conjugates. Br J Dermatol 101: 617–624

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reynolds G, Rodriguez E (1981) Prenylated hydroquinones: contact allergens from trichomes of Phacelia minor and P. parryi. Phytochemistry 20: 1365–1366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bergmann HH, Beijersbergen JCH, Overeem JC, Sijpesteijn AK (1967) Isolation and identification of a-methylene-y-butyrolactone: a fungitoxic substance from tulips. Recueil Travaux Chim Pays-Bas 86: 709–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Landsteiner K, Jacobs JL (1936) Studies on the sensitization of animals with simple chemicals. J Exp Med 64: 625–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dupuis G, Benezra C (1982) Allergic contact dermatitis to simple chemicals. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hellerström S, Thyresson N, Blohm SG, Widmark G (1955) On the nature of eczematogenic component of oxidized 43-carene. J Invest Dermatol 24: 217–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Karlberg AT (1988) Contact allergy to colophony. Chemical identification of allergens. Sensitization experiments and clinical experiments. Acta Derm Venereol 68 [Suppl 1391: 1–43

    Google Scholar 

  24. Karlberg AT, Shao L.P, Nilsson U, Gäfvert E, Nilsson JLG (1994) Hydroperoxides in oxidized d-limonene identified as potent contact allergens. Arch Dermatol Res 286: 97–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stampf JL, Benezra C, Klecak G, Geleick H, Schulz K. H, Hausen B (1982) The sensitization capacity of helenin and two of its main constituents, the sesquiterpene lactones, alantolactones and isoalantolactone. Contact Dermatitis 8: 16–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Baer RL (1954) Cross-sensitization phenomena. In: Mackenna (ed) Modern trends in dermatology. Butterworth, London, pp 232–258

    Google Scholar 

  27. Benezra C, Maibach H (1984) True cross-sensitization, false cross-sensitization and otherwise. Contact Dermatitis 11: 65–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen NC, Blaney JM, Humblet C, Gund P, Barry DC (1990) Molecular modeling software and methods for medicinal chemistry. J Med Chem 33: 883–984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Coopman S, Degreef H, Dooms-Goossens A (1989) Identification of cross-reaction patterns in allergic contact dermatitis from topical corticosteroids. Br J Dermatol 121: 27–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lepoittevin JP, Drieghe J, Dooms-Goossens A (1995) Studies in patients with corticosteroid contact allergy: understanding cross-reactivity among different steroids. ArchDermatol 131: 31–37

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Barbier A, Rizova E, Stampf J-L, Lacheretz F, Pistor F H M, Bos J D, Kapsenberg M L, Becker D, Mohamadzadeh M, Knop J, Mabic S, Lepoittevin J-P (1994) Development of a predictive in vitro test for detection of sensitizing compounds (European BRIDGE project). In: Rougier A, Goldberg AM, Maibach HI (eds) In vitro skin toxicology (irritation, phototoxicity, sensitization). Liebert, New York, pp 341–350

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dooms-Goossens A, Dooms M, Drieghe J. (1992) Computers and patients information systems. In: Rycroft RJG, Menne T, Frosch PJ, Benezra C (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 771–784

    Google Scholar 

  33. Benezra C, Sigman CC, Perry I R, Helmes T C, Maibach H I (1985) A systematic search for structure-activity relationships of skin contact sensitisers. J Invest Dermatol 85: 351–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Barratt MD, Basketter DA, Chamberlain M, Admans GD, Langowski JJ (1994) An expert system rule base for identifying contact allergens. Toxic In Vitro 8: 1053–1060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fraginals R, Roberts DW, Lepoittevin J-P, Benezra C (1991) Refinement of the relative alkylation index ( RAI) model for skin sensitization and application to mouse and guinea-pig test data for alkylsulfonates. Arch Dermatol Res 283: 387–394

    Google Scholar 

  36. Franot C, Roberts DW, Smith RG, Basketter DA, Benezra C, Lepoittevin J-P (1994) Structure-activity relationships for contact allergenic potential of y,y-dimethyl-ybutyrolactone derivatives, part I. Chem Res Toxicol 7: 297–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Franot C, Roberts DW, Basketter DA, Benezra C, Lepoittevin J-P (1994) Structure-activity relationships for contact allergenic potential of 7,7-dimethyl-y-butyrolactone derivatives, part II. Chem Res Toxicol 7: 307–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lepoittevin, JP. (2001). Molecular Aspects of Allergic Contact Dermatitis. In: Rycroft, R.J.G., Menné, T., Frosch, P.J., Lepoittevin, JP. (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10302-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10302-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-10304-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10302-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics