Abstract
Relying solely on extrinsic motivational incentives creates both problems and unintentional results. This chapter will demonstrate this, using the example of stock options for top managers. The widespread practice of granting stock options is based on the idea that managers will thus be motivated to gear their interest and activities toward increasing the value of their company. Until now, this connection has been hard to document. In our empirical research, we find that stock options moreover have an unintentional negative impact. They enable top-level managers who are not sufficiently supervised to amass large incomes at the owners’ expense. Stock options allow managers to act in a selfish manner and may even encourage such behavior. Therefore, the complex task of motivating managers cannot be reduced to simple extrinsic incentives. On the contrary, new, alternative motivational tools should be actively sought out.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Murphy, K. J. (1999): Executive Compensation, in: Ashenfelter, 0./Card, D. (eds): Handbook of Labor Economics, vol 3, Amsterdam, pp 2486–2563.
Murphy, K. J (1985): Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration: An
Empirical Analysis, in: Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (1–3), pp 1 1–42. Deckop, J. R. (1988): Determinants of Chief Executive Officer Compensation, in: Industrial and Labor Relations Review 41 (2), pp 215–226.
Jensen, M. C./Murphy, K. J. (1990): Performance Pay and Top-Management Incentives, in: Journal of Political Economy 98 (2), pp 225–264.
Hall, B. J./Liebman, J. B. (1998): Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats, in: Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (3), pp 653–691.
Abowd, J. M./Kaplan, D. S. (1999): Executive Compensation: Six Questions That Need Answering, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives 13 (4), pp 145–168.
Osterloh, M. (1999): Wertorientierte Unternehmensführung und Management-Anreizsysteme, in: Kumar, B. N./Osterloh, M./Schreyögg, G. (eds): Unternehmensethik und die Transformation des Wettbewerbs. Shareholder-Value —Globalisierung — Hyperwettbewerb, Stuttgart, pp 183–204.
Finkelstein, S./Boyd, B. (1998): How Much Does the CEO Matter? The Role of Managerial Discretion in the Setting of CEO Compensation, in: Academy of Management Journal 41 (2), pp 179–199.
Core, J. E./Holthausen, R. W./Larcker, D. E (1999): Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance, in: Journal ofFinancial Economics 51, pp 371–406.
Bertrand, M./Mullainathan, S. (2000): Do CEO’s Set Their Own Pay? The Ones Without Principles Do, NBER Working Paper No. 7604.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benz, M., Kucher, M., Stutzer, A. (2002). Stock Options for Top Managers — The Possibilities and Limitations of a Motivational Tool. In: Frey, B.S., Osterloh, M. (eds) Successful Management by Motivation. Organization and Management Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10132-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10132-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07623-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10132-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive