Skip to main content

Single-Peakedness

  • Chapter
Social Choice Theory
  • 1044 Accesses

Abstract

Now we know the principle difficulty with the Condorcet winner extension of simple majority voting: sometimes it simply doesn’t work. On the other hand, it often does work. In Chapter 2 it was suggested that simple majority voting will yield a Condorcet winner if there is sufficient “consensus” among the preference orderings of individuals. In this chapter we will try to capture one notion of “consensus” in a property of preference assignments and show this is sufficient to ensure avoidance of a voting paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Single-peaked preferences were introduced by Duncan Black in The Theory of Committees and Elections (Cambridge University Press, 1958). The proof of the theorem in this chapter follows Kenneth J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values (Wiley, 1951). For more general sufficient conditions for avoiding the voting paradox, see Prasanta Pattanaik, Voting and Collective Choice (Cambridge University Press. 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kelly, J.S. (1988). Single-Peakedness. In: Social Choice Theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09925-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09925-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-09927-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09925-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics