Abstract
Now we know the principle difficulty with the Condorcet winner extension of simple majority voting: sometimes it simply doesn’t work. On the other hand, it often does work. In Chapter 2 it was suggested that simple majority voting will yield a Condorcet winner if there is sufficient “consensus” among the preference orderings of individuals. In this chapter we will try to capture one notion of “consensus” in a property of preference assignments and show this is sufficient to ensure avoidance of a voting paradox.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Single-peaked preferences were introduced by Duncan Black in The Theory of Committees and Elections (Cambridge University Press, 1958). The proof of the theorem in this chapter follows Kenneth J. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values (Wiley, 1951). For more general sufficient conditions for avoiding the voting paradox, see Prasanta Pattanaik, Voting and Collective Choice (Cambridge University Press. 1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelly, J.S. (1988). Single-Peakedness. In: Social Choice Theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09925-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09925-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-09927-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09925-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive