Advertisement

Umsetzung der Theorie in direkte Behandlung — Kunst und Wissenschaft zugleich

  • Jane A. Koomar
  • Anita C. Bundy
Chapter
Part of the Rehabilitation und Prävention book series (REHABILITATION)

Zusammenfassung

Wenn ein Patient das Behandlungszimmer betritt, müssen wir darauf vorbereitet sein, auf verschiedenen Ebenen gleichzeitig zu reagieren. Wir beginnen einen „Dialog“, in dessen Verlauf wir zuhören,beobachten und kommunizieren. Wir erfahren etwas über die Bereitschaft des Patienten, mit der Behandlungseinheit zu beginnen, und über den Zustand seines Zentralnervensystems. Wir bauen eine „spielerische“ Interaktion auf, durch die wir das Vertrauen des Patienten gewinnen. Wir geben ihm zu verstehen, daß wir nicht mehr von ihm verlangen, als er geben kann. Gemeinsam mit dem Patienten erarbeiten wir ein Programm mit Aktivitäten, die seinen inneren Antrieb wecken, sein Umfeld zu erforschen und zu beherrschen, und seine Selbstbestimmung und Weiterentwicklung fördern. Geschickt wandeln wir diese Aktivitäten so ab, daß sie „genau die richtige Herausforderung“ darstellen, und sorgen im Verlauf der Sitzung dafür, daß die einzelnen Aktivitäten fließend ineinander übergehen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. American Medical Association (1989). Physicians current procedural terminology ( 4th ed. ). Chicago: AuthorGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayres, A. J. (1972). Sensory integration and learning disorders. Los Angeles: Western Psychological ServicesGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres, A. J. (1975). Southern California Postrotary Nystagmus Test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological ServicesGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayres, A. J. ( 1977, March). Developmental dyspraxia,. Symposium conducted in Dayton, OhioGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayres, A. J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles: Western Psychological ServicesGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayres, A. J. (1985). Developmental dyspraxia and adult-onset apraxia. Torrance, CA: Sensory Integration InternationalGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayres, A. J. (1989). Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological ServicesGoogle Scholar
  8. Ayres, A. J., Tickle, L. S. (1980). Hyper-responsivity to touch and vestibular stimuli as a predictor of positive response to sensory integration procedures by autistic children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 34, 375–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bly, L. (1983). The components of normal movement during the first year of life and abnormal motor development. Birmingham, AL: Pathway PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Bobath, B. (1985). Abnormal postural reflex activity caused by brain lesions ( 3rd ed. ). Rockville, MD: Aspen SystemsGoogle Scholar
  11. Boehme, R. (1988). Improving upper body control. Tucson, AZ: Therapy Skill Builders Bonder, B. R., Fisher, A. G. (1989). Sensory integration and treatment of the elderly. Gerontology Special Interest Section News, 12 (1), 2–4Google Scholar
  12. Bundy, A. C. (1990). The challenge of functional outcomes: Framing the problem. Neuro-Developmental Treatment Association NewsletterGoogle Scholar
  13. Cermak, S. A. (1985). Developmental dyspraxia. In E. A. Roy (Ed.), Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders (pp. 225–250 ). New York: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, F., Mailloux, Z., Parham, D. (1989). Sensory integration and children with learning disabilities. In P. N. Pratt and A. S. Allen (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children ( 2nd ed., pp. 457–507 ). St. Louis: C. V. MosbyGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, A. G. (1989). Objective assessment of the quality of response during two equilibrium tests. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 9 (3), 57–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fisher, A. G., Bundy, A. C. (1989). Vestibular stimulation in the treatment of postural and related disorders, In O. D. Payton, R. P. DiFabio, S. V. Paris, E. J. Protas, A. G. Van Sant (Eds.), Manual of Physical Therapy Techniques (pp. 239–258 ). New York: Churchill LivingstoneGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, A. G., Dunn, W. (1983). Tactile defensiveness: Historical perspectives, new research:Google Scholar
  18. A theory grows. Sensory Integration Special Interest Section Newsletter, 6 (2), 1–2 Harris, S. R. (1988). Early intervention: Does developmental therapy make a difference? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7, 20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Howison, M. V. (1988). Cerebral palsy. In H. L. Hopkins and H. D. Smith (Eds.), Willard and Spackmans occupational therapy (7th ed., pp. 675–706 ).Google Scholar
  20. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Kagan, J., Reznick, J., Snidman, N., Garcia-Coll, C. (1984). The biology and psychology of behavioral inhibition in young children. Child Development, 55, 2212–2225Google Scholar
  21. Keogh, J., Sugden, D. (1985). Movement skill development. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  22. Koomar, J. (1990). Providing sensory integration therapy as an itinerant therapist. Environment: Implications for occupational therapy practice. A sensory integrative approach. Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy AssociationGoogle Scholar
  23. Luria, A. (196 1). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. New York: LiverightGoogle Scholar
  24. May, T. (1988). Identifying gravitational insecurity in children with sensory integrative dysfunction. Unpublished masters thesis, Boston University, BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Peiper, A. (1963). Cerebral function in infancy and childhood New York: Consultants BureauGoogle Scholar
  26. Pribram, K. (1975). Arousal, activation and effort in the control of attention. Psychological Review, 82, 116–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schaefer, C. E., Reid, S. E. (1986). Game play: Therapeutic use of childhood games. New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  28. Schumaker, E. F. (1977). A guide for the perplexed. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  29. Standards of practice for the evaluation and treatment of sensory integrative dysfunction. Sensory Integration International (1987/1988). Vol. 6–8Google Scholar
  30. Smith, S., Scardina, V. (1980). Ethical intervention. Torrance, CA: Center for the Study of Sensory Integrative Dysfunction, 4, 1–2Google Scholar
  31. Stilwell, J. (1981). Relationship between development of the body-righting reaction and manual midline crossing behavior in the learning disabled. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 35, 391–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. US Department of Health and Human Services (1989). The international classification of diseases, (9th revision), Clinical Modification. DHHS No. (PHS) 89–1260. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing OfficeGoogle Scholar
  33. Wehman, P. (1977). Helping the mentally retarded acquire play skills: A behavioral approach. Springfield, IL: Charles C. ThomasGoogle Scholar
  34. Weisz, S. (1938). Studies in equilibrium reactions. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 88, 150–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilbarger, P. (1988). Sensory Defensiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Conference, Boston University, Department of Occupational Therapy, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams, H. G. (1983). Perceptual and motor development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane A. Koomar
  • Anita C. Bundy

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations