Advertisement

Pollutant Formation

  • Gunnar Stiesch
Part of the Heat and Mass Transfer book series (HMT)

Abstract

In the ideal case of complete combustion of a hydrocarbon fuel with stoichiometric air, the exhaust gas would be composed of the chemical species carbon dioxide (CO2), water (H2O) and molecular nitrogen (N2) only. For lean equivalence ratios, molecular oxygen (O2) could be observed among the products as well. However, in real combustion systems there are two reasons that inhibit complete combustion: (i) Elementary chemical reactions never proceed completely into one direction, but they always approach an equilibrium state between products and reactants. Thus, at least a small amount of reactants will remain. (ii) Local boundary conditions such as mixture distribution, temperature and turbulence level are often non-ideal. Therefore, flame extinction, accompanied with unburned or partially burned species, or the formation of entirely new products, e.g. soot or nitrogen oxides, may occur. Consequently, additional components are present in the exhaust gases of combustion engines. These components are carbon monoxide (CO), unburned hydrocarbons (HC), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter which is often approximated as soot. Depending on the quality of the fuel there may also be traces of sulfur oxides (SOx) within the exhaust gas.

Keywords

Diesel Engine Soot Particle Diffusion Flame Soot Formation Soot Volume Fraction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Bai XS, Balthasar M, Mauss F, Fuchs L (1998) Detailed Soot Modeling in Turbulent Jet Diffusion Flames. 27th Symp (Int) Combust, pp 1623–1630, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Balthasar M, Heyl A, Mauss F, Schmitt F, Bockhorn H (1996) Flamelet Modeling of Soot Formation in Laminar Ethyne/Air-Diffusion Flames. 26th Symp (Int) Combust, pp 2369–2377, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Bockhorn H (ed) (1994) Soot Formation in Combustion: Mechanisms and Models. Springer, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Bockhorn H, Chevalier C, Warnatz J, Weyrauch V (1991) Experimental Investigation and Modeling of Prompt NO Formation in Hydrocarbon Flames. In: Santoro RJ, Felske JD (eds), HTD-Vol 166, Heat Transfer in Fire and Combustion Systems, Book No G00629–1991Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bollig M, Pitsch H, Hewson JC, Seshadri K (1996) Reduced n-Heptane Mechanism for Non-Premixed Combustion with Emphasis on Pollutant-Relevant Intermediate Species. 26th Symp (Int) Combust, pp 729–737, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Bowman CT (1975) Kinetics of Pollutant Formation and Destruction in Combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci, vol 1, pp 33–45MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Eastwood PG (2000) Critical Topics in Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment. Research Studies Press, Baldock, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Fenimore CP (1971) Formation of Nitric Oxide in Premixed Hydrocarbon Flames. 13th Symp (Int) Combust, pp 373–380, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Frenklach M (1985) Computer Modeling of Infinite Reaction Sequences — a Chemical Lumping. Chem Engineering Sci, vol 40, no 10, pp 1843–1849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Franklach M, Wang H (1994) Detailed Mechanism and Modeling of Soot Particle Formation. In: Bockhorn H (ed) Soot Formation in Combustion, pp 165–192, Springer, Berlin, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Fusco A, Knox-Kelecy AL, Foster DE (1994) Application of a Phenomenological Soot Model to Diesel Engine Combustion. 3rd Int Symp COMODIA 94, pp 315–324Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Greis AE, Grünefeld G, Becker M, Pischinger S (2002) Quantitative Measurements of the Soot Distribution in a Realistic Common-Rail DI Diesel Engine. 11th Int Symp Application of Laser Techniques to Fluid MechanicsGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hewson JC (1995) Reduced Mechanisms for Hydrocarbon and Nitrogen Chemistry in Diffusion Flames. CECR Report 95–01, Center for Energy and Combustion Research, University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Hewson JC, Bollig M (1996) Reduced Mechanisms for NOx Emissions form Hydrocarbon Diffusion Flames. 26th Symp (Int) Combust, pp 2171–2179, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Heywood JB (1988) Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Hiroyasu H, Kadota T, Arai M (1983) Development and Use of a Spray Combustion Model to Predict Diesel Engine Efficiency and Pollutant Emissions. Part 1: Combustion Modeling. Bull JSME, vol 26, no 214, pp 569–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Karlsson A, Magnusson I, Balthasar M, Mauss F (1998) Simulation of Soot Formation Under Diesel Engine Conditions Using a Detailed Kinetic Soot Model. SAE Paper 981022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Klaus P, Warnatz J (1995) A Contribution towards a Complete Mechanism for the Formation of NO in Flames. Joint Meeting of the French and German Sections of the Combustion Institute, Mulhouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Kleemann AP (2001) CFD Simulation of Advanced Diesel Engines. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, University of London, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Lavoie GA, Heywood JB, Keck JC (1970) Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Nitric Oxide Formation in Internal Combustion Engines. Combust Sci Tech, vol 1, pp313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Maly RR, Stapf P, König G (1998) Progress in Soot modeling for Engines. 4th Int Symp COMODIA 98, pp 25–34Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Mauss F, Trilken B, Breitbach H, Peters N (1994) Soot Formation in Partially Pre-mixed Diffusion Flames. In: Bockhorn H (ed) Soot Formation in Combustion. pp 325–349, Springer, Berlin, GermanyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Mayer K, Spicher U (2000) Optical Investigations on Combustion in a DI Diesel Engine with an Endoscopic System and the Two-Color-Method. ASME ICE Spring Congress, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Merker GP, Stiesch G (1999) Technische Verbrennung — Motorische Verbrennung. Teubner, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Miller JA, Bowman CT (1989) Mechanism and Modeling of Nitrogen Chemistry in Combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci, vol 15, pp 287–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Nagle J, Strickland-Constable RF (1962) Oxidation of Carbon between 1000–2000°C. Proc 5th Conf on Carbon, vol 1 ppl54–164, Pergamon Press, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Pischinger F, Schulte H, Jansen J (1988) Grundlagen und Entwicklungslinien der dieselmotorischen Brennverfahren. VDI Berichte no 14, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Schubiger RA, Boulouchos K, Eberle MK (2002) Rußbildung und Oxidation bei der dieselmotorischen Verbrennung. Motortechnische Zeitschrift MTZ, vol 63, no 5, pp 342–353Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Stiesch G (1999) Phänomenologisches Multizonen-Modell der Verbrennung und Schadstoffbildung im Dieselmotor. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hanover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Stiesch G, Merker GP (1999) A Phenomenological Model for Accurate and Time Efficient Prediction of Heat Release and Exhaust Emissions in Direct-Injection Diesel Engines. SAE Paper 1999–01-1535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Warnatz J, Maas U, Dibble RW (2001) Combustion: Physical and Chemical Fundamentals, Modeling and Simulation, Experiments, Pollutant Formation. Springer, Berlin, GermanyzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Zeldovich YB (1946) The Oxidation of Nitrogen in Combustion and Explosions. Acta Physicochimica, USSR, vol 21, pp 577–628Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunnar Stiesch
    • 1
  1. 1.Instit. f. Technische VerbrennungUniverstät HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations