Abstract
The origins of multivalued logics can be traced as deep as the treatises of Aristotle. He was the first to object to rigid bivalence of statements. His doubts concerned the so-called Law of the Excluded Middle (p V ~ p), considered as undeniable truth in classical logic. The idea of accepting sentences which (in a given instance) fail to be either absolutely true or absolutely false aroused contention between the Epicureans, on the one side, and the Stoics (including Chrysippus) on the other. The latter represented the standpoint of extreme determinism, with its orthodox bivalence in logic. The former, rejecting absolute determinism, admitted the possibility that neither of two statements, one of which negated the other, must necessarily be true; in particular, when the statements involved events that were to come. This is the reason why many-valued logics (or, more generally, non-classical logics) are sometimes referred to as non-Chrysippean.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bolc, L., Borowik, P. (1992). Many-Valued Propositional Calculi. In: Many-Valued Logics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08494-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-08494-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08145-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-08494-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive