Skip to main content

Towards a Conceptual Framework for Predicting Engineering Design Team Performance Based on Question Asking Activity Simulation

  • Chapter
Human Behaviour in Design
  • 397 Accesses

Abstract

The product development process has undergone significant changes in the last two decades. Consumers have become more sophisticated in their choices, products have become more complex, and the barriers to entry to competitors have been significantly lowered. All this has resulted in an increased emphasis on creative teamwork and shorter product development times. In turn this has led to an increased number of descriptive studies of the engineering design process in the research community as well as the development of various tools and methods aimed at improving the process. Success in this endeavor has been a difficult battle for the research community and several authors have made attempts to analyze the obstacles responsible for the difficulty. Blessing for example notes:

“... identifying whether this [a method or tool] indeed contributes to success is far more difficult and the results are not easy to generalize. Success is difficult to measure other than in a real, industrial situation and action research in an industrial situation is notoriously difficult, let alone comparative action research. Furthermore, the success of a method or tool depends on the context in which it is being used. This context is different for every design process, because every design project is unique” (Blessing et al. 1998).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Badke-Schaub P, Frankenberger E, Dorner D (1997) Analysing Design Work by Critical Situations: Identifying Factors Influencing Teamwork in Design Practice. In: Riitahuhta A (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Tampere, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales RF (1950) Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Addison-Wesley, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudin C, Gevins J, Baya V, and Mabogunje A (1992) Dedal: Using domain concepts to index engineering design information. In: Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Bloomington, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Blessing LTM, Chakrabarti A, Wallace KM (1998) An Overview of Descriptive Studies in Relation to a General Design Research Methodology. In: Frankenberger E, BadkeSchaub P, Birkhofer H (eds) Designers - The Key to Successful Product Development. Springer-Verlag, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton RM, Obel B (1993) On the Validity of Simulation Models in Organization Science. In: Proceedings, The Next Quarter Century: Economics, Education, Management, A conference in Honor of Richard M. Cyert, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen GP (1992) The Virtual Design Team: An Information Processing Model of the Design Team Management. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowlen C (1997) Development of a Cognitive Framework for Design Science. In: Riitahuhta A (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Tampere, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JR (1974) Organization Design: An Information Processing View. Interfaces 4: 28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR, Russell DM (1996) Generative Design Rationale: Beyond the Record and Replay Paradigm. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds) Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen PHK, Larsen JH, Mabogunje A, Leifer L (1997) Simulating Design Coordination. The Stanford-Aalborg Empirical Studies Part ( 1 ) In: Riitahuhta A (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Tampere, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer LJ (2002) Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, California, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabogunje A, Baya V, Brereton MF, and Leifer LJ (1993) 210-X: A Method and a Methodology for Improving Product development Performance. In: Hubka (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, The Hague, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabogunje A, Leifer LI, Levitt RE, and Baudin C (1995) ME210-VDT: A Managerial Framework for Improving Design Process Performance. In: Frontiers in Education Conference, Atlanta, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean A, Young RE, Bellotti VME, Moran TP (1996) Questions Options and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds) Design Rationale: Concepts Techniques and Use. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Storath E, Mogge C, Meerkamm H (1997) Teleengineering: Product Development in Virtual Design Offices Using Distributed Engineering Network Services. In: Riitahuhta A (ed) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, Tampere, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright W (2003) Chief Designer, Maxis, Inc., and Designer of the Computer Game SimCity

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mabogunje, A. (2003). Towards a Conceptual Framework for Predicting Engineering Design Team Performance Based on Question Asking Activity Simulation. In: Lindemann, U. (eds) Human Behaviour in Design. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07811-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07811-2_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07366-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07811-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics