Flowering Plants · Dicotyledons pp 198-202 | Cite as
Droseraceae
- 1.3k Downloads
Abstract
Perennial or annual carnivorous herbs, sometimes (Aldrovanda) submerged aquatics. Primary root often suppressed; stembase with adventitious roots, sometimes with corms or root tubers. Leaves spiral or rarely whorled, simple, often rosulate, the blade infolded or adaxially circinate in bud, either equipped with irritable, mucilage-tipped tentacles that entrap and digest insects and other little animals (fly-paper trap, Drosera), or modified into fast-closing snap-traps with sensitive bristles (Dionaea, Aldrovanda); intrapetiolar stipules often present. Inflorescences thyrso-paniculate, cincinnate, or (Aldrovanda) flowers solitary. Flowers hermaphroditic, regular, hypogynous; sepals (4)5(–8), more or less connate at base, imbricate; petals as many as sepals, free, convolute; stamens (4)5(–20), distinct, or (Dionaea) basally connate; anthers extrorse, 2-locular, opening longitudinally; gynoecium of 3(5) carpels united to form a compound, unilocular ovary; stylodia distinct and often deeply bifid, or (Dionaea) united into a common style; stigmas terminal, dry; ovules (3–)numerous, anatropous, bitegmic, crassinucellate or tenuinucellate, with long funicles on parietal placentas or a basal placenta. Fruit a loculicidal capsule, rarely indehiscent. Seeds (3–)numerous, mostly scobiform; endosperm copious, rich in starch; embryo small. n = 5−24.
Keywords
Adventitious Root Ellagic Acid Pollen Morphology Glandular Hair Carnivorous PlantPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Selected Bibliography
- Airy Shaw, H.K. 1951. On the Dioncophyllaceae; a remarkableGoogle Scholar
- new family of flowering plants: Kew Bull. 1951: 327–350.Google Scholar
- Albert, V.A., Williams, S.E., Chase, M.W. 1992. Carnivorous plants: phylogeny and structural evolution. Science 257: 1491–1495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boesewinkel, F.D. 1989. Ovule and seed development in Droseraceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 38: 295–311.Google Scholar
- Chen, L., James, S.H., Stace, H.M. 1997. Self incompatibility, seed abortion and clonality in the breeding system of several western Australian Drosera species (Droseraceae). Aust. J. Bot. 45: 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chrtek, J., Slavíková, Z. 1996. Comments on the families Drosophyllaceae and Droseraceae. Casopis Národního Rada Prirovedna 165: 139–141.Google Scholar
- Chrtek, J., Slavíková, Z. 1999. Genera and families of the Droserales order. Novit. Bot. Univ. Carol. Praha 13: 39–46.Google Scholar
- Conran, J.G., Jaudzems, V.G., Hallam, N.D. 1997. Droseraceae germination patterns and their taxonomic significance. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 123: 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Davis, G.L. 1966. See general references.Google Scholar
- DeBuhr, L.E. 1977. Sectional reclassification of Drosera subgenus Ergaleium (Droseraceae). Aust. J. Bot. 25: 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Diels, L. 1906. Droseraceae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich IV, 112 Leipzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
- Diels, L. 1936. Droseraceae. In: Engler, A., Harms, H. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn., 17b. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 766–784.Google Scholar
- Dixon, K.W., Pate, S.J. 1978. Phenology, morphology and reproductive biology of the tuberous sundew, Drosera erythrorhiza Lindl. Aust. J. Bot. 26: 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Downie, S.R., Olmstead, R.G., Zurawski, G., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S., Watson, J.C., Palmer, J.D. 1991. Six independent losses of the chloroplast DNA rpl2 intron in dicotyledons: molecular and phylogenetic implications. Evolution 45: 1245–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haccius, B., Troll, W. 1961. Über die sogenannten Wurzelhaare an den Keimpflanzen von Drosera-und Cuscuta-Arten. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 26: 139–157.Google Scholar
- Hegnauer, R. 1966, 1989. See general references.Google Scholar
- Hoshi, Y., Kondo, K. 1998. A chromosome phylogeny of the Droseraceae by using CMA-DAPI fluorescent banding. Cytology 63: 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Juniper, B.E., Robins, R.J., Joel, D.M. 1989. The carnivorous plants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Kondo, K. 1976. A cytotaxonomic study in some species of Drosera. Rhodora 78: 532–541.Google Scholar
- Kondo, K., Lavarack, P.S. 1984. A cytotaxonomic study of some Australian species of Drosera. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 88: 317–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Korzshinsky, S. 1886. Über die Samen der Aldrovanda vesiculosa L. Bot. Centralbl. 27: 302–304, 334–335.Google Scholar
- Lledó, M.D., Crespo, M.B., Cameron, K.M., Fay, M.F., Chase, M.W. 1998. Systematics of Plumbaginaceae based upon cladistic analysis of rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 23: 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Meimberg, H., Dittrich, P., Bringmann, G., Schlauer, J., Heubl, G. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of Caryophyllales s.l. based on matK sequences with special emphasis on carnivorous taxa. Plant Biol. 2: 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Muller, J. 1981. See general references.Google Scholar
- Netolitzky, F. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermen-Samen. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie II, 2, Band X. Berlin: Borntraeger.Google Scholar
- Ragetli, H.W.J., Weintraub, M., Lo, E. 1972. Characteristics of Drosera tentacles: I. Anatomical and cytological detail. Can. J. Bot. 50: 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seine, R., Barthlott, W. 1992. Ontogeny and morphological quality of the marginal bristles of Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Droseraceae). Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 67: 289–294.Google Scholar
- Seine, R., Barthlott, W. 1993. On the morphology of trichomes and tentacles of Droseraceae Salisb. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 67: 345–366.Google Scholar
- Sheikh, S.A., Kondo, K. 1995. Differential staining with orcein, Giemsa, CMA, and DAPI for comparative chromosome study of 12 species of Australian Drosera. Am. J. Bot. 82: 1278–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi, H., Sohma, K. 1982. Pollen morphology of the Droseraceae and its related taxa. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. IV, Biol. 38: 81–156.Google Scholar
- Troll, W., Weberling, F. 1989. Infloreszenzuntersuchungen an monotelen Familien. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
- Williams, S.E. 1976. Comparative sensory physiology of the Droseraceae: the evolution of a plant sensory system. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 120: 187–204.Google Scholar
- Williams, S.E., Albert, V.A., Chase, M.W. 1994. Relationships of Droseraceae: a cladistic analysis of rbcL sequence and morphological data. Am. J. Bot. 81: 1027–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar