Advertisement

Handaxes: The First Aesthetic Artefacts

Chapter

Abstract

The first stone artefacts made by our human ancestors appear 2.5 million years ago and are referred to as the Oldowan culture. These are nodules of basalt, chert and limestone that have been struck with a hammerstone to remove flakes. Both the flakes and the remnants of the nodules, referred to as cores, were used for the processing of animal carcasses; they may have also been used for other activities such as cracking nuts, chopping plants, removing bark and throwing at prey (Schick and Toth 1993). Although such artefacts have traditionally been associated with Homo habilis, it is possible that several early hominids including australopithecines produced such tools (Susman 1991). With regard to aesthetics, Oldowan tools have little appeal. There was no intentionally imposed design with the resulting cores simply being a product of the original shape of the nodule and the number of flakes removed. By 1.4 million years ago, however, a new type of artefact appears in the archaeological record — the handaxe. This appears quite different to anything in the Oldowan culture due to a deliberately imposed form that often exhibits considerable symmetry.

Keywords

Mate Choice Fluctuate Asymmetry Modern Human Stone Tool Perceptual Bias 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello L, Dunbar RIM (1993) Neocortex size, group size and the evolution of language. Curr Anthropol 34: 184–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiello L, Wheeler P (1995) The expensive tissue hypothesis. Curr Anthropol 36: 199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asfaw B, Beyene Y, Suwa G, Walter RC, White T, Woldegabriel G, Yemane T (1992) The earliest Acheulian from Konso-Gardula, Ethiopia. Nature 360: 732–735Google Scholar
  4. Ashton NM, McNabb J (1994) Bifaces in perspective. In: Ashton N, David A (eds) Stories in stone. Lithics Studies Society Occasional Paper No 4, Lithic Studies Assoc, London, pp 182–191Google Scholar
  5. Austin L (1994) The life and death of a Boxgrove biface. In: Ashton N, David A (eds) Stories in stone. Lithics Studies Society Occasional Paper No 4, Lithic Studies Assoc, London, pp 119–126Google Scholar
  6. Barker A (1998) A quantitative study of symmetry in handaxes. MA Diss, University of Reading, Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergman CA, Roberts MB (1988) Flaking technology at the Acheulian site of Boxgrove, West Sussex ( England ). Rev Archeol Picardie 1–2: 105–113Google Scholar
  8. Bickerton D (1996) Language and human behaviour. University College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bosinski G ( 1996 ) Stone artefacts of the European Lower Palaeolithic. In: Roebroeks W, van Kolfschoten T (eds) The earliest occupation of Europe. Analecta Praehistoria Leidensia vol 27. University of Leiden, Leiden, pp 262–267Google Scholar
  10. Braitenberg V (1984) Vehicles: experiments in synthetic psychology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne R, Whiten A (1988) Machiavellian intelligence: social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes and humans. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Calvin W (1993) The unitary hypothesis: a common neural circuitry for novel manipula-tions, language, plan-ahead and throwing. In: Gibson KR, Ingold T (eds) Tools, language and cognition in human evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 230–250Google Scholar
  13. Deacon T (1997) The symbolic species. Allen Lane, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Dennell R (1994) Comment on `Technology and Society during the Middle Pleistocene’ by S. Mithen. Cambridge Archaeol J 4: 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennett D (1991) Consciousness explained. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. De Waal F (1982) Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among the apes. Jonathan Cape, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunbar RIM (1993) Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in primates. Behav Brain Sci 16: 681–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunbar RIM (1996) Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. Faber and Faber, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Goss RJ (1983) Deer antlers: regeneration, function and evolution. Academic Press, London Gowlett J (1984) Mental abilities of early man: a look at some hard evidence. In: Foley R (ed) Hominid evolution and community ecology. Academic Press, London, pp 167–192Google Scholar
  20. Hayden B (1979) Palaeolithic reflections. Humanities Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  21. Inzian M-L, Roche H, Tixier J (1992) Technology of Knapped stone. CNRS, ParisGoogle Scholar
  22. Isaac G (1977) Olorgesailie. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones P (1980) Experimental butchery with modern stone tools and its relevance for Palaeolithic archaeology. World Archaeol 12: 153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones P (1981) Experiment implement manufacture and use: a case study from Olduvai Gorge. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 292: 189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keeley L (1980) Experimental determination of stone tool uses: a microwear analysis. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeley L, Toth N (1981) Microwear polishes on early stone tools from Koobi Fora, Kenya. Nature 203: 464–465Google Scholar
  27. Kohn M, Mithen S (1999) Handaxes: products of sexual selection? Antiquity 73:518–526 Mania D, Mania U (1988) Deliberate engravings on bone artefacts by Homo erectus. Rock Art Res 5: 91–107Google Scholar
  28. Manning JT, Chamberlain AT (1993) Fluctuating asymmetry, sexual selection and canine teeth in primates. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 251: 83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Manning JT, Hartley MA (1991) Symmetry and ornamentation are correlated in the peacock’s train. Anim Behav 42: 1020–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Marshack A (1997) The Berekhat Ram figurine: a late Acheulian carving from the Middle East. Antiquity 71: 327–337Google Scholar
  31. Miller GF (1997) How mate choice shaped human nature: a review of sexual selection and human evolution. In: Crawford C, Krebs DL (eds) Handbook of evolutionary psychology: ideas, issues and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Maahwah, NJ, pp 87–129Google Scholar
  32. Mithen S (1994) Technology and society during the middle Pleistocene. Cambridge Archaeol J 4: 3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mithen S (1996) The prehistory of the mind. Thames and Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Moller AP (1988) Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332: 640–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moller AP (1990) Fluctuating asymmetry in male sexual ornaments may reliably reveal male quality. Anim Behav 40: 1185–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moller AP (1992) Patterns of fluctuating asymmetry in weapons: evidence for reliable sig-nalling of quality in beetle horns and bird spurs. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 245: 1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oakley KP (1981) Emergence of higher thought. Philosophical Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 292: 205–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parsons PA (1992) Fluctuating asymmetry: a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. Heredity 68: 361–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pelegrin J (1993) A framework for analysing prehistoric stone tool manufacture and a tentative application to some early stone industries. In: Berthelet A, Chavaillon J (eds) The use of tools by human and non-human primates. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 302–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roberts MB, Parfitt SA, Pope MI, Wenban-Smith FF (1997) Boxgrove, West Sussex: rescue excavations of a Lower Palaeolithic landsurface (Boxgrove Project B, 1989–91). Proc Prehist Soc 63: 303–358Google Scholar
  41. Roe D (1981) The lower and middle Palaeolithic periods in Britain. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Ruff CB, Trinkaus E, Holliday TW (1997) Body mass and encaphalization in Pleistocene Homo. Nature 387: 173–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schick K, Toth N (1993) Making silent stones speak: human evolution and the dawn of technology. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Shanks OC, Bonnichsen R, Vella AT, Ream W (2001) Recovery of proteins and DNA trapped in stone tool microcracks. J Archaeol Sci 28: 965–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Susman RL (1991) Who made the Oldowan tools? Fossil evidence for tool behaviour in Plio-Pleistocene hominids. J Anthropol Res 47: 129–151Google Scholar
  46. Thieme H (1997) Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature 385: 807–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thornhill R, Gangestad S (1994) Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behaviour. Psychol Sci 5: 297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thornhill R, Gangestad S (1996) The evolution of human sexuality. Trends Ecol Evol 11: 98–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell BG (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 139–179Google Scholar
  50. Villa P (1983) Terra Amata and the Middle Pleistocene record from Southern France. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  51. Whiten A, Byrne R (1997) Machiavellian intelligence II: extensions and evaluations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wymer J (1983) The Palaeolithic Age. Croom Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. Wynn T (1979) The intelligence of later Acheulian hominids. Man 14: 371–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wynn T (1989) The evolution of spatial competence. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  55. Wynn T (1993) Two developments in the mind of early Homo. J Anthropol Archaeol 12: 299–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wynn T (1995) Handaxe enigmas. World Archaeol 27: 10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wynn T, Tierson F (1990) Regional comparison of the shapes of later Acheulian handaxes. Am Anthropol 92: 73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zahavi A, Zahavi A (1997) The handicap principle. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations