Advertisement

Explaining the Distribution of Manufacturing Productivity in the EU Regions

  • Bernard Fingleton
  • Enrique López-Bazo
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

In this Chapter, simulations of manufacturing productivity levels across the EU provide detailed insights regarding possible long-run distributions under various alternative assumptions about the determinants of productivity growth. The explanation of manufacturing productivity growth by region is based on an econometric model embodying recent developments in urban economic theory and geographical economics, which includes both internal and external increasing returns and spatial externality (spillover) effects. The model implies market interdependence involving a competitive manufacturing sector and producer services under monopolistic competition. The assumption of technological externalities and the presence of cross-region spillovers in the model lead to a specification that is typical of recent approaches in spatial econometrics, which seeks to avoid bias by a specification involving spatial interdependence. The Chapter uses recent developments in the analysis of growth empirics, involving the application of the estimated density function and the stochastic kernel, in order to visualize the long-run stochastic distributions under various assumptions. We control for the effects of various ancillary factors assumed to influence the equilibrium distribution so as to isolate the impact of each individual factors of interest. The visualizations enabled by the stochastic kernel clearly identify the effect of the different model variables on the entire regional distribution of manufacturing productivity.

Keywords

Human Capital Productivity Growth Manufacture Productivity Composite Service Service Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel-Rahman H, Fujita M (1990) Product variety, Marshallian externalities, and city sizes. Journal ofRegional Science, 30: 165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barro R (1991) Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106: 407–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro R, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100: 223–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bianchi M (1997) Testing for convergence: Evidence from non-parametric multimodality tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12: 393–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron G (1996) Innovation and Economic Growth. DPhil thesis, Ch 2, University of OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, 86: 54–70Google Scholar
  7. Cheshire PC, Hay DG (1989) Urban problems in Western Europe: an Economic Analysis. Unwin Hyman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Durlauf SN, Quah D (1999) The New Empirics of Economic Growth. In: Taylor J, Woodford, M (eds) Handbook of Macroeconomics. Elsevier Science, North-Holland, New York and Oxford, pp 235–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fingleton B (1997) Specification and testing of Markov chain models: An application to convergence in the European Union. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 59: 385–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fingleton B (2000) Spatial econometrics, economic geography, dynamics and equilibrium : a third way? Environment & Planning A, 32: 1481–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fingleton B (2001 a) Theoretical economic geography and spatial econometrics: dynamic perspectives. Journal of Economic Geography, 1: 201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fingleton B (2001 b) Equilibrium and economic growth: spatial econometric models and simulations. Journal of Regional Science, 41: 117–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge and LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujita M, Thisse JF (1996) Economics of agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10: 339–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glaeser EL (1999) Learning in cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 46: 254–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gordon I, McCann P (2000) Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks? Urban Studies, 37: 513–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacobs J (1969) The Economy of Cities. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, PA (2000) A nonparametric analysis of income convergence across the US States. Economics Letters, 69: 219–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston J (1984) Econometric Methods. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennedy P (1992) A Guide to Econometrics. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Koutsoyiannis A (1977) Theory of Econometrics. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Krugman P (1991) Geography and Trade. Leuven University Press, LeuvenGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamo A (2000) On convergence empirics: some evidence for Spanish regions. Investigaciones Economicas 24: 681–707Google Scholar
  24. Leser C (1966) Econometric Techniques and Problems. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. López-Bazo E, Vayá E, Mora AJ, Suriñach J (1999) Regional economic dynamics and convergence In The European Union. The Annals of Regional Science, 33: 343–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maddala G S (2001) An Introduction to Econometrics. Wiley New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Magrini S (1999) The evolution of income disparities among the regions of the European Union. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29: 257–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 407–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Puga D (1999) The rise and fall of regional inequalities. European Economic Review, 43: 303–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Quah D (1993) Empirical cross-section dynamics in economic growth. European Economic Review, 37: 426–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quah D (1996a) Convergence empirics across economies with (some) capital mobility. Journal of Economic Growth, 1: 95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quah D (1996b) Regional convergence clusters across Europe. European Economic Review, 40: 951–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quigley J (1998) Urban diversity and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12: 127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rivera-Batiz F (1988) Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and agglomeration economies in consumption and production. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18: 125–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Silverman BW (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Stokey N, Lucas R E Jr (1989) Recursive Methods in Economic Dynamics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. and LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Fingleton
    • 1
  • Enrique López-Bazo
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CambridgeUK
  2. 2.University of BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations