Abstract
With the rapid increase in the size and power of digital computers over the past decade, the direct numerical analysis approach to engineering design is now adopted on a routine basis. In the field of linear elastic stress analysis in particular, the finite element method is now used almost indiscriminately, and the results produced are often accepted without question. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate by example that belief in calculated results should be tempered with caution. The first example demonstrates how the accuracy of a finite element analysis can be limited by the simplifying modelling assumptions that are imposed by practical and commercial constraints, and illustrates the necessity for testing the validity of the assumptions made. It is shown that a combination of theoretical and experimental work may be necessary before a full understanding of the physical behaviour of the component under investigation can be achieved. The second example discussed in the paper shows that even if a given theoretical approach provides an apparently satisfactory solution, full confidence in the solution is not justified unless the theoretical approach has been validated, either against another independent theoretical technique or against experiment. Validation of one theoretical analysis against another, when both are based on the same fundamental approach (such as the finite element method) is shown to be insufficient.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brebbia, C.A. (1978), “The Boundary Element Method for Engineers”. Pentech Press, London.
Danson, D., Brebbia, C.A. and Adey. R.A. (1982), “The Beasy System”. Adv. Eng. Software, 4, 2: 68–74.
Fenner, R.T. (1983), “The Boundary Integral Equation
Boundary Element) Method in Engineering Stress Analysis“. Jnl of Strain Analysis, 18,4:199–205.
Rocke y, K.C., Evans, H.R., Griffiths, D.W. and Nethercot, D.A. (1979), “The Finite Element Method. A Basic Introduction for Engineers.” Granada Publishing.
Toms, A.E. (1975), “Some Factors in Marine Gearing for Classification Purposes”. Trans. I. Mar. E., 87, 274–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Floyd, C.G. (1984). The Determination of Stresses Using a Combined Theoretical and Experimental Analysis Approach. In: Brebbia, C.A., Keramidas, G.A. (eds) Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06375-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-06375-0_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-06377-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-06375-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive