Abstract
By events, or yes-no experiments, pertaining to some physical system we understand the physical quantities, or observables, that admit only two outcomes. Since the 1936 seminal work of G. Birkhoff and J. Neumann [4] it is recognized that, in the framework of physical systems exhibiting a quantum behaviour, the algebraic structure associated to the events is not an algebraic model of classical logic, it is the algebraic model of a new logic, to be called quantum logic. This fact outlines a deep departure from the realm of classical physics where the events pertaining to a physical system carry the structure of a Boolean algebra, hence an algebraic model of classical logic. In Sect. 2 we shall review the structure of the events of classical and of quantum events and we will recall the main branching point.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L. Accardi, A. Fedullo: ‘On the Statistical Meaning of Complex Numbers in Quantum Mechanics’. Lett. Nuovo Cimento 34 (1982) pp. 161–172
A. Aspect: ‘Experimental Tests of Bell’s Inequalities With Correlated Photons’. In: Waves, Information and Foundations of Physics ed. by R. Pratesi, L. Ronchi ( Societ Italiana di Fisica, Bologna 1998 )
J.S. Bell: `On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox’. Physics 1 (1964) pp. 195–200
G. Birkhoff, J. von Neumann: ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’. Ann. Math 37 (1936) p. 823
E.G. Beltrametti, S. Bugajski: ‘The Bell Phenomenon in Classical Frameworks’. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29 (1996) pp. 247–261
E.G. Beltrametti, S. Bugajski: ‘A Classical Extension of Quantum Mechanics’. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 28 (1995) pp. 3329–3343
E.G. Beltrametti, S. Bugajski: ‘Effect Algebras and Statistical Physical Theories’. J. Math. Phys. 38 (1997) pp. 3020–3030
E.G. Beltrametti, G. Cassinelli: The Logic of Quantum Logics ( Addison Wesley, Reading 1981 )
E.G. Beltrametti, B.C. van Fraassen (eds.): Current Issues in Quantum Logic (Plenum,• New York 1981 )
E.G. Beltrametti, M.J. Maczynski: ‘On a Characterization of Classical and Nonclassical Probabilities’. J. Math. Phys. 32 (1991) pp. 1280–1286
E.G. Beltrametti, M.J. Maczynski: ‘On the Characterization of Probabilities: A Generalization of Bell Inequalities’. J. Math. Phys. 34 (1993) pp. 4919–4929
E.G. Beltrametti, M.J. Maczynski: `On the Intrinsic Characterization of Classical and Quantum Probabilities’. In: Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Physics ed. by P. Busch, P. Lahti, P. Mittelstaedt (World Scientific, Singapore 1993 )
G. Boole: `On the Theory of Probability’. In: Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, 152 (1862) pp. 225–252
S. Bugajski: ‘Fundamentals of Fuzzy Probability Theory’. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 35 (1996) pp. 2229–2244
E.B. Davies, J.T. Lewis: ‘An Operational Approach to Quantum Probability’. Comm Math. Phys. 17 (1970) pp. 239–260
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen: ‘Can Quantum-mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? Phys. Rev. 47 (1935) pp. 777–780
S. Gudder: ‘Fuzzy Probability Theory’. Demonstratio Mathematica 31 (1998) pp. 235–354
M. Jammer The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics ( Wiley, New York 1974 )
P. Mittelstaedt: Quantum Logic ( Reidel, Dordrecht 1978 )
I. Pitowsky: ‘Quantum-Probability Logic’. In: Lecture Notes in Physics Vol. 321 ( Springer, Berlin 1989 )
P. Ptak, S. Pulmannova: Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics ( Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht 1991 )
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beltrametti, E.G. (2004). Quantum Logic and Quantum Probability. In: Weingartner, P. (eds) Alternative Logics. Do Sciences Need Them?. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05679-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05679-0_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07391-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05679-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive