Much has been written about the Turing Test in the last few years, some of it preposterously off the mark. People typically mis-imagine the test by orders of magnitude. This essay is an antidote, a prosthesis for the imagination, showing how huge the task posed by the Turing Test is, and hence how unlikely it is that any computer will ever pass it. It does not go far enough in the imagination-enhancement department, however, and I have updated the essay with a new postscript.
KeywordsExpert System World Knowledge Computing Machinery Combinatorial Explosion Turing Test
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Descartes, R., 1637, Discourse on Method, LaFleur, Lawrence, trans., New York: Bobbs Merrill, 1960.Google Scholar
- 4.Haugeland, J., 1981, Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 5.Heiser, J. F., Colby, K. M., Faught, W. S., and Parkinson, R. C., 1980, “Can Psychiatrists Distinguish a Computer Simulation of Paranoia from the Real Thing? The Limitations of Turing-Like Tests as Measures of the Adequacy of Simulations,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, 15(3): 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kolodner, J. L., 1983, “Retrieval and Organization Strategies in Conceptual Memory: A Computer Model” (Ph.D. diss.), Research Report #187, Dept. of Computer Science, Yale University.Google Scholar
- 10.Weizenbaum, J., 1974, letter to the editor, Communications of the Association of Computing Machinery, 17(9), September.Google Scholar
- 11.Winograd, T., 1972, Understanding Natural Language, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar