Quantum Theory and the Place of Mind in Nature
Classical physics can be viewed as a triumph of the idea that mind should be excluded from science, or at least from the physical sciences. Although the founders of modern science, such as Descartes and Newton, were not so rash as to proclaim that mind has nothing to do with the unfolding of nature, the scientists of succeeding centuries, emboldened by the spectacular success of the mechanical view of nature, were not so timid, and today we are seeing even in psychology a strong movement towards “materialism”, i.e., toward the idea that “mind is brain”. But while psychology has been moving toward the mechanical concepts of nineteenth-century physics, physics itself has moved in just the opposite direction.
KeywordsQuantum Theory Classical Physic Atomic Physic Discontinuous Change Conscious Thought
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.W. Heisenberg, Daedalus 87, 95–108, 1958.Google Scholar
- 2.N. Bohr, Atomic Physics and the Description of Nature (Wiley, New York, 1934), p. 18.Google Scholar
- 4.N. Bohr, Essays 1958/62 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1963).Google Scholar
- 5.W. Heisenberg, Physics and Philosophy (Harper and Row, New York, 1958), p. 54.Google Scholar
- 6.D. C. Dennett, Consciousness Explained (Little, Brown and Co., New York, 1991).Google Scholar
- 7.H. P. Stapp, the present book.Google Scholar
- 8.M. Gell-Mann, in The Nature of the Physical Universe, the 1976 Nobel Conference (Wiley, New York, 1979), p. 29.Google Scholar
- 9.J. S. Bell, On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox, Physics 1, 195 (1964).Google Scholar
- 10.D. Bohm, A Suggested Interpretation of Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden” Variables I, Phys. Rev. 85, 166–179.Google Scholar
- 11.B. J. Baars, The Cognitive Revolution in Psychology (Guildford, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
- 12.A. Einstein, in Albert Einstein Philosopher-Scientist, edited by P. A. Schilpp (Tudor, New York, 1951).Google Scholar
- 13.H. P. Stapp, the present book.Google Scholar