Advertisement

Motion and Flow

  • Marinus T. Vlaardingerbroek
  • Jacques A. den Boer
Chapter

Abstract

So far in this textbook only stationary tissue is considered. However, patient motion during acquisition causes inconsistencies in phase and amplitude of the (transverse) magnetization, which lead to blurring and ghosts [1]. Methods to minimize these artifacts will be discussed in this chapter. Also, motion itself may be the object of an MRI study, as is for example the case in the study of cardiac motion [2]. Methods used to study moving structures and to avoid the artifacts caused by these moving structures will be surveyed in Sect. 7.2.

Keywords

Transverse Magnetization Stationary Tissue Inversion Pulse Flow Void Longitudinal Magnetization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Effects of Diffusion in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Split Echo Experiments, D.E. Woessner, J. Chem. Phys., 34, pp. 2057–2061, 1961Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Diffusion and Field Gradient Effects in NMR Fourier Spectroscopy, R. Kaiser, E. Bartholdy and R.R. Ernst, J. Chem. Phys., 608, pp. 1966–2979, 1974Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Echoes, How to Generate, Recognise, Use or Avoid Them in MR Imaging Sequences, J. Hennig, Concepts in Magn. Res., 3, 125–143, 1991Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burst Imaging, J. Hennig and M. Hodapp, MAGMA, 1, pp. 39–48, 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    On the Stationary State of Gradient Echo Imaging, W.T. Sobol and D.M. Gauntt, Journ. of Magn. Res. Im., 6, pp. 384–398, 1996Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    RARE Imaging: a Fast Imaging Method for Clinical MR, J. Hennig, A. Nauert, H. Friedburg, Magn. Res. in Med.,3, pp. 823–833, 1986Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Sensitivity of Low Flip Angle RARE Imaging, D.A. Alsop, Magn. Res. in Med.,37, pp. 176–184, 1997Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments, H.Y. Carr, E.M. Purcel, Phys. Rev., 94, pp. 630–638, 1954Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Modified Spin Echo Method for Measuring Nuclear Relaxation Times, S. Meibohm, D.Gill, Rev. Scientific Instruments, 29, pp. 688–691, 1958Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    DANTE Ultrafast Imaging Sequence (DUFIS), I.J. Lowe and R.E. Wysong, J. Magn. Res., B 101, pp. 106–109, 1993Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Analytical Solution for Phase Modulation in BURST Imaging with Optimum Sensitivity, P.v. Gelderen, Ch.T. Moonen, J.H. Duyn, J. Magn. Res., B 107, pp. 78–82, 1995Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Optimised Ultra Fast Imaging Sequence (OUFIS), L. Zha, I.J. Lowe, Magn. Res. in Med.,33, pp. 377–395, 1995Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Susceptibility Insensitive Single Shot MRI Combining BURST and Multiple Spin Echoes, P.v. Gelderen, Ch.T. Moonen, J.H. Duyn, Magn. Res. in Med.,3, pp. 439–442, 1995Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ultra Rapid Gradient Echo Imaging, O. Heid, M. Deimling, W.J. Huk, Magn. Res. in Med.,33, pp. 143–149, 1995Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fast Volume Scanning with Frequency Shifted BURST MRI, J.H. Duyn, P.v. Gelderen, G. Liu, Ch. T.W. Moonen, Magn. Res. in Med.,32, pp. 429–432, 1994Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    QUEST, A Quick Echo Split NMR Imaging Technique, O. Heid, M. Deimling, W. Huk, Magn. Res. in Med.,29, 280–283, 1993Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    PREVIEW: a New Ultrafast Imaging Sequence Regarding Minimal Gradient Switching, C.J. Counsell, Magn. Res. Imaging,11, pp. 603–616 1993Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Analysis and Evaluation of Ultra-Fast MR Sequences, J. Kürsch, A.R. Brenner, T.G. Noll, Proc. ISMRI, 1996Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D Bolus Tracking with Frequency Shifted BURST MRI, J.H. Duyn, P.v. Gelderen, P. Barker, J.A. Frank, V.S. Mattay, Ch.T.W. Moonen, J. of Comp. Assisted Tomography, 18 (5), pp. 680–687, 1994Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Optimisation of Ultrafast Multi-Pulse Sequences for Dynamic MR Imaging, A.R. Brenner, A. Glowinski, J. Kürsch, M. Drobnitzki, T.G. Noll, R.W. Gunther, Proc. ISMRI, 1996Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    MR Cholangiopancreatography Using HASTE Sequences, T. Myazaki, Y. Yamashita, T. Tsuchigame, H. Yamamoto, J. Orata, M. Takahashi, Am. J. of Radiology, 166, pp. 1297–1303, 1996Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Current Status of Cholangiopancreatography, C. Reinhold, P.M. Bret, Am. J. of Radiology, 166, pp. 1285–1295, 1996Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Optimization of a Dual Echo in the Steady State (DESS) Free-Precession Sequence for Imaging Cartilage, P.A. Hardy, M.P. Recht, D. Piraino, D. Thomas-son, J. of Magn. Res. Im., 6, pp. 329–335, 1996Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steady-State Effects in Fast Gradient Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging, J.H. Duyn, Magn. Res. in Med.,37, pp. 559–568, 1997Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Selective Pulse Creation by Inverse Solution of the Bloch—Ricatti Equation, M. Silver, R. Joseph, D. Hoult, J. Magn. Res., 59, p. 347, 1984Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    The Synthesis of Pulse Sequences Yielding Arbitrary Magnetization Vectors, M. Shinnar, S. Eleff, H. Subramanian, J.S. Leigh, Magn. Res. in Med.,12, pp. 74–80, 1989 (See also the three following papers in the same Journal)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. le Roux, French Patent 8610179, 1986Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A Linear Class of Large Tip Angle Selective Excitation. Pulses, J. Pauly, D. Nishimura, A. Mackovski, J. Magn. Res., 82, pp. 571–587, 1989Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parameter Relations for the Shinnar—le Roux Selective Excitation Pulse Design Algorithm, J. Pauly, P. le Roux, D. Nishimura, A. Mackovski, IEEE Trans. Med. Im., 10, pp. 53–65, 1991Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Classical Mechanics,H. Goldstein (Addison-Wesley Publ. Comp., Reading Inc, Mass. 1950) Libr. of Congress Catalog No 50–7669Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pancreatic Duct, Morphologic and Functional Evaluation with Dynamic Pancreatography after Secretin Stimulation, C. Matos, T. Metens, J. Deviere, N. Nicaise, P. Braude, G.v. Yperen, M. Cremer, J. Struiven, Radiology, 203, pp. 435–441, 1997Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marinus T. Vlaardingerbroek
    • 1
  • Jacques A. den Boer
    • 2
  1. 1.The Netherlands
  2. 2.The Netherlands

Personalised recommendations