Skip to main content

Chemical metrology, chemistry and the uncertainty of chemical measurements

  • Chapter
Measurement Uncertainty in Chemical Analysis

Abstract

Chemical results normally involve traceability to two reference points, the specific chemical entity and the quantity of this entity. Results must also be traceable back to the original sample. As a consequence, any useful estimation of uncertainty in results must include components arising from any lack of specificity of the method, the variation between repeats of the measurement and the relationship of the result to the original sample. Chemical metrology does not yet incorporate uncertainty arising from any lack of specificity from the method selected or the traceability of the result to the original sample. These sources of uncertainty may however have much more impact on the reliability of the result than will any uncertainty associated with the repeatability of the measurement. Uncertainty associated with sampling may amount to 50–1000% of the reported result. Chemical metrology must be expanded to include estimations of uncertainty associated with lack of specificity and sampling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. CITAC (2000) Traceability in chemical measurement. CITAC web page at http://www.vtt.fi/ket/citac/traceability

  2. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, O1ML (1995) Guide to the Expression of the uncertainty in measurement. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (Bureau International des Poids et Mesures)http://www.bipm.org/enu s/2_Commi ttees/CCQM. shtml

    Google Scholar 

  4. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide (2000) Qualifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn., Final Draft April 2000. EURACHEM

    Google Scholar 

  5. ISO/IEC 17025 (1999) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISO 25 (1990) General requirements for the competence of calibration and testing laboratories. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horwitz W (2000) Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Md., USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Codex Committee on Methods of Analysis and Sampling 23rd Session, Budapest, Hungary 26 February-2 March, 2001. Proposed draft guidelines for the application of the criteria approach by the committee on methods of analysis and sampling. Agenda item 4a (CX/MAS 01/4)

    Google Scholar 

  9. King B (2000) Accred Qual Assur 5: 173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wells RJ, Smith RJ (1996) Chem Aust April 1996: 167–168

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alexandrov YI (1997) Fresenius J Anal Chem 357: 563–571

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burns-Flett E (2000) Report by the Histamine Quality Assurance Co-ordinator, Canadian Food Inspection Agency dated 31 March 2000. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 501 University Crescent, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vogel AI (1961) A textbook of quantitative inorganic analysis including elementary instrumental analysis, 3rd edn. Longmans, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clapp S (2000) Professional qualifications: How close should we look? Inside Laboratory Management June 2000: 18–20. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Md., USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gy P (1998) Sampling for analytical purposes. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  16. Love JL (2000) Sampling — What should analytical chemists learn from microbiologists? Inside Laboratory Management February 2000: 17–18. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, Md., USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Love, J.L. (2003). Chemical metrology, chemistry and the uncertainty of chemical measurements. In: De Bièvre, P., Günzler, H. (eds) Measurement Uncertainty in Chemical Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05173-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05173-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07884-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05173-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics