New Technologies for Ocean Margin Studies — Autonomous Instrument Carrier Systems

  • C. WaldmannEmail author
  • R. Lampitt


Processes that determine the environmental structure of ocean margins are calling for multidisciplinary observations. Current knowledge has been gained mainly through ship board observational programs. But this approach is not sufficient to account for the variability of the processes involved in the ocean margin environment. For instance the importance of intense events of short duration compared to slowly but permanently ongoing processes is not well understood up to now. Therefore the main focus of future observational program will be on improving the spatial and temporal coverage of the measured parameters and enhancing the long-term capability of the system.This paper describes already existing or upcoming technologies that will allow for more intensive investigations of water column properties. Moored profiling platforms that are able to host a complete suit of physical, biological and chemical sensors are introduced as efficient observational tools to fulfil the envisaged goals. Common to all described systems are the need for adequate energy supply, autonomous operation and bi-directional data exchange to enable event triggered sampling. The tradeoffs between different technological approaches addressing the mentioned scientific needs and the consequences for their applicability are described.


Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Euphotic Zone Mooring Line Docking Station Cont Shelf 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biscaye PE, Anderson RF, Deck BL (1988) Fluxes of particulates and constituents to the eastern United States continental slope and rise: SEEP-I. Cont Shelf Res 8: 855–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biscaye PE, Anderson RF (1990) Transport and transfer rates in the waters of the continental shelf and slope. SEEP Report US Department of Energy 78 pGoogle Scholar
  3. Biscaye PE, Flagg CN, Falkowski PG (1994) The shelf edge exchange processes experiment, SEEP-II: An introduction to hypotheses, results and conclusions. Deep-Sea Res II 41:231–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doherty KW, Frye DE, Liberatore SP, Toole JM (1999) A Moored Profiling Instrument, J Atmos Oceanic Techn 16:1816–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eckert AC, Morrison JH, White GB, Geller EW (1989) The autonomous ocean profiler: A current driven oceanographic sensor platform. IEEE J Ocean Engin 14:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eriksen CC, Dahlen JM, Shillingford Jr JT (1982) An upper ocean moored current and density profiler applied to winter conditions near Bermuda. J Geophys Res 87(C10):7879–7902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fowler GA, Hamilton JM, Beanlands BD, Belliveau DJ, Furlong AR (1997) A wave-powered profiler for long-term monitoring. Proceedings Oceans 97, MTS IEEE Conference, 6–9 October 1997, Halifax, NS, Canada pp 225–229Google Scholar
  8. Meinecke G, Ratmeyer V (1999) A bi-directional link into the deep-sea — The DOMEST project, Second International Conference on EuroGOOS, 10–13 March 1999, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  9. Monaco A, Biscaye P, Soyer J, Pocklington R, Heusner S (1990) Particle fluxes and ecosystem response on a continental margin: The 19 8 5–19 8 8 Mediteranean ECOMARGE experiment. Cont Shelf Res 10:809–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Provost C, du Chaffaut M (1996) YOYO profiler: An autonomous multi-sensor. Sea Techn 37:39–45Google Scholar
  11. Skoglund S (1998) The shallow water profiler TRAMP. Internal Report, University of Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Leer J, Düing JW, Erath R, Kennelly E, Speidel A (1974) The Cyclesonde: An unattended vertical profiler for scalar and vector quantities in the upper ocean. Deep-Sea Res 21:385–400Google Scholar
  13. Van Weering TCE, McCave IN, Hall IR (eds) (1998) Ocean margin exchange (OMEX 1) benthic processes study. Progr Oceanogr 42 (1–4)Google Scholar
  14. Waldmann C (1999) A newly designed deep-sea YOYOprofiler for long term moored deployment. Second International Conference on EUROGOOS, 10–13 March 1999, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang DP, Wong GTF (1992) KEEP (Kuroshio Edge Exchange Processes). Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 3:225–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachbereich GeowissenschaftenUniversität BremenBremenGermany
  2. 2.George Deacon Division, Midwater Biology TeamSouthampton Oceanography CenterSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations