Abstract
In regions of complex geology, the corresponding seismic time sections show diffraction events, distorted positions of reflectors, smeared lateral discontinuities and uncertain amplitudes of seismic reflections with the consequence that the interpreter cannot automatically reconstruct and identify the cross-section through the earth from the seismic time section. The purpose of migration (imaging of seismic data) is to reconstruct structural depth sections from seismic time sections and to produce a geological image of the subsurface. ‘Poststack migration’ is an imaging process that uses stacked averaged seismic data. Stacking reduces the amount of data drastically, and thus subsequent migration of stacked data is less expensive than prestack migration. On the other hand, severe problems occur where the standard stacking procedure can no longer be applied, e.g. when the reflection surfaces are strongly curved or there are strong variations of velocities. The ‘prestack seismic migration process’ is a reconstruction of subsurface structures directly from measurements at the surface of the earth. The advantages of this process particularly appear in faulted steep dip regions with extreme flexures. Furthermore, this process allows an iterative estimation of the migration velocity field (macro velocity field), which is needed as an important parameter field for the migration process itself. ‘Depth migration’ is a transformation, mapping, and imaging of measured seismic time data into a migrated depth section. It yields a reliable image of the subsurface, provided that the migration velocity field (macro velocity field) is correct. ‘Time migration’, in principle, represents a special type of depth migration, where the depth scale τ is scaled by a pseudo-time scale using a replacement velocity. Most time migration schemes do not take into account the refraction of waves at the boundaries, hence, these schemes fail to image data from laterally inhomogeneous media. On the other hand, time migration schemes show low sensitivity to migration velocity errors and can be used as an intermediate step in seismic data processing for imaging seismic data. The conventional seismic 2-D technique provides an erroneous image of the subsurface, if the subsurface varies perpendicularly to the 2-D seismic recording direction. In this case, a 3-D technique has to be applied. The 3-D migration process plays a fundamental role in the 3-D processing sequence. It provides a reliable image of the earth and avoids possible misinterpretation which may occur when 3-D structures are explored with 2-D methods. 3-D poststack time migration is often used in practical work because this first result is needed for first interpretation and to check the effect of 3-D processing and 3-D imaging. Nevertheless, this type of imaging fails to give a reliable image of the subsurface in the case of complex geological areas, e.g. complex overburden structures. 3-D poststack depth migration needs the same computing time as 3-D prestack time migration, but yields a reliable depth image of the subsurface provided that the conditions for 3-D stacking are given and a reliable 3-D macro velocity field is available. 3-D prestack depth migration has long been recognized as the appropriate imaging procedure for complex structures and complex velocities. It requires that the velocity field is estimated using the migration procedure itself in an iterative manner, however, therefore this migration process consumes an enormous amount of computing time. In this paper, we focus on the description of a 3-D imaging process which uses a special type of 3-D prestack depth migration only to estimate the 3-D macro velocity field and then applies a 3—D poststack depth migration scheme. This scheme is applied to a 3-D data set acquired at the Costa Rica convergent margin.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berhorst A (1999) Die Auswirkungen verschiedener Geschwindigkeitsmodelle und Migrationsmethoden auf das seismische Imaging von 3D — Daten, Diploma Thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Berkhout AJ (1984) Seismic Migration, Part B, Practical Aspects. Elsevier, Amsterdam 274 p
Berkhout AJ (1997) Pushing the limits of seismic imaging. Geophys 62: 937–969
Claerbout JF (1984) Imaging the Earth’s Interior. Blackwell Scientific Publication, Palo Alto, California 348 p
Devaux V, Gardner GHF, Rampersad T (1996) 3-D prestack depth migration by Kirchhoff Operator Splitting. 66th Ann Int Mtg, SEG Exp Abstr: 455–458
Gindler T (2000) Untersuchung und Vergleich von zwei verschiedenen 3D — Prestack — Migrationsverfahren als Two-Pass-Verfahren zur Ableitung eines 3D — Makrogeschwindigkeitsfeldes. Ph D Thesis, Christian -Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel
Hauschild J, Gindler T, Ristow D, Berhorst A, Bönnemann C, Hinz K (1999) 3D — Makro -Geschwindigkeitsbestimmungen und 3D — Tiefenmigration des seismischen 3D — Costa Rica — Datensatzes. GEOMAR REPORT No. 91, Kiel
Hinz K, Bönnemann C, Ranero C, Ristow D, Hauschild J, Gindler T (1999) Three-dimensional detailed imaging ofprominent structures in reflection seismics at the active continental margin off Costa Rica. BGR Report 0119373, BGR Hannover
Hubral P, Schleicher J, Tygel M (1996) A unified approach to 3-D seismic reflection imaging — Part II: Theory. Geophys 61: 759–775
Jeannot JP, Faye JP, Denelle E (1986) Prestack migration velocities from depth focusing analysis. 56th Ann Int Mtg, SEG Exp Abstr: 438–440
Jeannot JP, Berranger I (1994) Ray-mapped focusing: A migration velocity analysis for Kirchhoff prestack depth imaging. 64th Ann Intern Mtg, SEG Exp Abstr: 1326–1329
MacKay S, Abma R(1992) Imaging and velocity estimation with depth-focusing analysis. Geophys 57:1608–1622
Ristow D, Rühl T (1997) 3-D implicit finite-difference migration. Geophys 62: 554–567
Schneider WA (1978) Integral formulation for migration in two and three dimensions. Geophys 43:49–76
von Huene R, Flüh ER (1994) A review of marine geophysical studies along the Middle American Trench off Costa Rica and the problematic seaward terminus of continental crust. In: Seyfried H, Hellmann W (eds) Profil 7. Univ of Stuttgart, Stuttgart Germany, pp 143–159
von Huene R, Ranero C, Weinrebe W, Hinz K (1999) Quaternary convergent margin tectonics of Costa Rica, segmentation of the Cocos plate, and Central American volcanism. Spec Pap Geol Soc Am 295: 291–308
Yilmaz O, Chambers R (1984) Migration velocity analysis by wave field extrapolation. Geophys 49: 1664–1674
Yilmaz O (1987) Seismic Data Processing. Soc of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ristow, D., Hinz, K., Hauschild, J., Gindler, T., Berhorst, A., Bönnemann, C. (2002). Imaging the Subsurface with 2-D and 3-D Seismic Data. In: Wefer, G., Billett, D., Hebbeln, D., Jørgensen, B.B., Schlüter, M., van Weering, T.C.E. (eds) Ocean Margin Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05127-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05127-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07872-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05127-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive