Advertisement

Fluid Flow in Continental Margin Sediments

  • M. SchlüterEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The transfer of solutes and gases across the sediment-water interface through fluid flow at vents and seeps are complementing the inputs of nutrients, methane and xenobiotics through riverine and atmospheric input and diffusive fluxes from the seafloor to the water column of the continental margin. Fluid advection through sediments provide an efficient mechanism for the upward transport of reactive components and trace gases like methane and carbon dioxide, otherwise remineralised or precipitated within the sediment without impact on the chemistry of the ocean or the biota at the seafloor. Studies on submarine groundwater discharge and fluid venting along accretionay ridges emphasise the importance of fluid flow for hydrological budgets, biogeochemical cycles, and physical properties of sediments. Offshore plankton blooms, methane and trace element plumes, and release of large amounts of fresh water reveal the ecological and economic significance of submarine fluid discharge in the coastal zone. Along accretionary ridges, vent sites are characterised by the unique consortium of benthic organisms, formations of massive authigenic carbonates, methane plumes, and occurrences of gas hydrate. These features are associated with fluid flow in sediments. Techniques and tracers for localisation of discharge sites and quantification of discharge rates are introduced. The similarities between these two environmental settings characterised by fluid flow are considered and potential needs for future studies are discussed.

Keywords

Fluid Flow Continental Margin Discharge Site Accretionary Prism Submarine Groundwater Discharge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry JP, Greene HG, Orange DL, Baxter CH, Robison BH, Kochevar RE, Nybakken JW, Reed DL, McHugh CM (1996) Biologic and geologic characteristics of cold seeps in Monterey Bay, California. Deep-Sea Res 43:1739–1762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bohrmann G, Greinert J, Suess E, Torres M (1998) Authigenic carbonates from Cascadia subduction zone and their relation to gas hydrate stability. Geol 26:647–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bugna GC, Chanton JP, Cable JE, Burnett WC, Cable PH (1996) The importance of groundwater discharge to the methane budgets of nearshore and continental shelf waters of the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 60: 4735–4746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnett WC (1998) SCOR and LOICZ examine submarine groundwater discharge. IGPB Newsletter 36:13Google Scholar
  5. Bussmann I, Suess E (1998) Groundwater seepage in Eckernförde Bay (Western Baltic Sea): Effect on methane and salinity distribution of the water column. Cont Shelf Res 18: 1795–1806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cable JE, Burnett WC, Chanton JP, Weatherly GL (1996) Estimating groundwater discharge into the north-eastern Gulf of Mexico using radon-222. Earth Planet Sci Lett 144:591–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carson B, Seke E, Paskevich V, Wolmes ML (1994) Fluid expulsion sites on the Cascadia accretionary prism: Mapping direct diagenetic deposits with processed GLORIA. J Geophys Res 99: 959–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbett DR, Chanton J, Burnett W, Dillon K, Rutkowski C, Fourqurean J (1999) Patterns of groundwater discharge into Florida Bay. Limnol Oceanogr 44: 1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dando PR, Hughes JA, Leahy Y, Taylor LJ, Zivanovic S (1995) Earthquakes increase hydrothermal venting and nutrient inputs into the Aegean. Cont Shelf Res 15: 655–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis EE, Becker K, Wang K, Carson B (1995) Longterm observations ofpressure and temperature in Hole 892B, Cascadia Accretionary Prism. Proc ODP Sci Results 146:299–311Google Scholar
  11. Henry P, Foucher JP, Le Pichon X, Sibuet M, Kobayashi K, Traits P, Chamot-Rooke N, Furuta T, Schultheiss P (1992) Interpretation of temperature measurements from the Kaiko-Nankai cruise: Modelling of fluid flow in clam colonies. Earth Planet Sci Lett 109:355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hovland, M, Judd AG, 1988. Seabed Pockmarks and Seepages. Graham & Trotman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Hüttel M, Ziebis W, Forster S (1996) Flow-induced uptake of particulate matter in permeable sediments. Limnol Oceanogr 41:309–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jahnke RA, Nelson JR, Marinelli RL, Eckman, JE (2000) Benthic flux ofbiogenic elements on the south-eastern US continental shelf: Influence of pore water advective transport and benthic microalgae. Cont Shelf Res 20:109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johannes RE (1980) The ecological significance of the submarine discharge of groundwater. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 3:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kohout F (1966) Submarine springs: A neglected phenomenon of coastal hydrology. Hydro126:391–413Google Scholar
  17. Kvenvolden KA, Ginsburg GD, Soloviev VA (1993) Worldwide distribution of subaquatic gas hydrates. Geo-Mar Lett 13:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laroche J, Nuzzi R, Waters R, Wyman K, Falkowski P, Wallace D (1997) Brown tide blooms in Long Island’s coastal waters linked to interannual variability in groundwater flow. Glob Change Biol 3:397–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee DR (1977) A device for measuring seepage flux in lakes and estuaries. Limnol Oceanogr 22:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Le Pichon X, Foucher JP, Boulegue J, Henry P, Lallemant S, Benedetti M, Avedik F (1990) Mud volcano field seaward of the Barbados accretionary complex: A submersible survey. J Geophys Res 95:8931–8943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Linke P Suess E, Torres M, Martens V, Rugh WD, Ziebis W, Kulm LD (1994) In situ measurement of fluid flow from cold seeps at active continental margins. DeepSea Res 41:721–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacDonald IR, Guinasso NL, Sassen R, Brooks JM, Lee L, Scott KT (1994) Gas hydrate that breaches the seafoor on the continental slope ofthe Gulf ofMexico. Geol 22:699–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mienert J, Posewang J, Lukas D (2001) Changes in the hydrate stability zone on the Norwegian margin and their consequence for methane and carbon releases into the oceanosphere. In: Schäfer P, Ritzrau W, Schlüter M, Thiede J (eds) The Northern North Atlantic: A Changing Environment. Springer, Berlin pp 259–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore WS (1996) Large groundwater inputs to coastal waters revealed by 226Ra enrichments. Nature 380: 612–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore WS (1999) The subterranean estuary: A reaction zone of ground water and sea water. Mar Chem 65: 111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore WS, Shaw TJ (1998) Chemical signals from submarine fluid advection onto the continental shelf. J Geophys Res 103:21543–21552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moore JC, Vrolijk P (1992) Fluids in accretionary prisms. Rev Geophys 30: 113 – 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olu K, Lance S, Sibuet M, Henry P, Fiala-Médioni A, Dinet A (1997) Cold seep communities as indicators of fluid expulsion patterns through mud volcanoes seaward of the Barbados accretionary prism. DeepSea Res 44:811–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sauter E, Laier T, Andersen C, Dahlgaard H, Schlüter M (in press) Sampling of sub-seafloor aquifers by a temporary well for CFC age dating and natural tracer investigations. J Sea ResGoogle Scholar
  30. Sayles FL, Dickinson WH (1991) The Seep Meter: a benthic chamber for the sampling and analysis of low velocity hydrothermal vents. Deep-Sea Res 38: 129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schlüter M, Linke P, Suess E (1998) Geochemistry at a sealed deep-sea borehole of the Cascadia Margin. Mar Geol 148:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Screaton EJ, Carson B, Lennon GP (1995) Hydrogeologic properties of a thrust fault within the Oregon accretionary prism. J Geophys Res 100:20025–20035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaw TJ, Moore WS, Kloepfer J, Sochaski MA (1998) The flux of barium to the coastal waters of the southeastern USA: The importance of submarine groundwater discharge. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62:3047–3054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Suess E, Carson B, Ritger SD, Moore JC, Kulm LD, Cochrane GR (1985) Biological communities at vent sites along the subduction zone off Oregon. In: Jones ML (ed) The Hydrothermal Vents of the Eastern Pacific: An Overview. Vol. 6, Bull Biol Soc Washington, pp 475–484Google Scholar
  35. Suess E, Bohrmann G, von Huene R, Linke P, Wallmann K, Lammers S, Sahling H, Winckler G, Lutz RA, Orange D (1998) Fluid venting in the eastern Aleutian subduction zone. J Geophys Res 103:2597–2614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suess E, Torres ME, Bohrmann G, Collier RW, Greinert J, Linke P, Rehder G, Trehu A, Wallmann K, Winckler G, Zuleger E (1999) Gas hydrate destabilization: Enhanced dewatering, benthic material turnover and large methane plumes at the Cascadia convergent margin. Earth Planet Sci Lett 170:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Valiela I, D’Elia C (1990) Groundwater inputs to coastal waters. Biogeochem 10: 328 pGoogle Scholar
  38. Vanderborght JP, Wollast R, Billen G (1977) Kinetic models of diagenesis in disturbed sediments. Part I. Mass transfer properties and silica diagenesis. Limnol Oceanogr 22:787–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vogt PR, Gardner J, Crane K (1999) The NorwegianBarents-Svalbard (NBS) continental margin: Introducing a natural laboratory ofmass wasting, hydrates, and ascent of sediment, pore water, and methane. Geo- Mar Lett 19:2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. von Huene R, Scholl DV (1991) Observations at convergent margins concerning sediment subduction, erosion, and the growth of continental crust. Rev Geophys 29:279–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Westbrook GK, Carson B, Musgrave RT (1994) Proc. Ocean Drill. Program, Initial Rep 146:609pGoogle Scholar
  42. Wever TF, Abegg F, Fiedler HM, Fechner G, Stender IH (1998) Shallow gas in the muddy sediments of Eckernförde Bay, Germany. Cont Shelf Res 18: 1715–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und MeeresforschungBremerhavenGermany

Personalised recommendations