Abstract
Why is rent-seeking so endemic in societies? Might it not be possible to design a Pareto-improving social decision rule that sidesteps the inefficient waste of resources resulting from conflict? We study this question for a multiplayer contest. We assume that a benevolent planner knows the winning payoffs, the effectiveness of each rent-seeker, that the cost of expending resources is isoelastic, and that it is the same across all players. But she does not know the precise value of this elasticity. We show that this minimal lack of information leads to the impossibility of a Pareto-improving social decision rule, as long as there are at least four agents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anbarci, N., Skaperdas, S. and Syropoulos, C. (1999) Comparing Bargaining Solutions in the Shadow of Conflict. Mimeo
Esteban, J. and Ray, D. (1999a) Conflict and distribution. Journal of Economic Theory 87: 379–415
Esteban, J. and Ray, D. (1999b) Collective Action and the Group Size Paradox. Mimeo
Maskin, E. (1985) The Theory of Implementation in Nash Equilibrium: a Survey. In: Hurwicz, L., Schmeidler, D. and Sonnenschein, H. (eds.) Social Goals and Social Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Moore, J. (1992) Implementation, Contracts and Renegotiation in Environments with Complete Information. In: Laffont, J.J. (ed.) Advances in Economic Theory, VI World Congress of the Econometric Society (vol. I). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Moulin, H. (1999) The Proportional Random Allocation of Indivisible Units. Mimeo. Department of Economics, Rice University
Skaperdas, S. (1995) Contest success functions. Economic Theory 7: 283–290
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Esteban, J., Ray, D. (2003). Social decision rules are not immune to conflict. In: Glazer, A., Konrad, K.A. (eds) Conflict and Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05121-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05121-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05527-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05121-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive