Skip to main content

Stress Echocardiography After Cardiac Transplantation

  • Chapter
Stress Echocardiography

Abstract

Cardiac transplantation is an increasingly important treatment for end-stage cardiac disease, but rejection continues to be a major complication. Rejection can be either acute or chronic [1] (Table 1). Acute rejection is a major problem in the istyear following cardiac transplantation [1]. It is characterized by normal epicardial coronary arteries, with a concomitant restriction in coronary flow reserve [2] — a pathophysiological hallmark of microvascular disease, as it has been described in other situations such as syndrome X or hypertension with normal coronary arteries (Chap. 19). In particular, during acute cardiac rejection, the reversible reduction of coronary reserve could be the result of the limitation of vasodilation due to functional abnormalities such as metabolically or immunologically related decreased responsiveness of vascular wall to vasodilator stimuli or to structural abnormalities, for example, interstitial edema or cellular infiltration [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jamieson SW (1992) Investigation of heart transplant coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation 85:1211–1213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nitemberg A, Tavolaro O, Loisance D, et al (1989) Severe impairment of coronary reserve during rejection in patients with orthotopic heart transplant. Circulation 79:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciliberto GR, Mascarello M, Gronda E, et al (1994) Acute rejection after heart transplantation: noninvasive echocardiographic evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:1156–1161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Angermann CE, Nassau K, Stempfle HU, et al (1997) Recognition of acute cardiac allograft rejection from serial integrated backscatter analyses in human orthotopic heart transplant recipients. Comparison with conventional echocardiography. Circulation 95:140–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciliberto GR, Pingitore A, Mangiavacchi M, et al (1996) The clinical value of blunting of cyclic gray level variation for the detection of acute cardiac rejection: a two-dimensional, Doppler, and videodensitometric ultrasound study. J Am Soc Echoc 27:142–148

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smart FW, Ballantyne CM, Cocanougher B, et al (1991) Insensitivity of noninvasive tests to detect coronary artery vasculopathy after heart transplant. Am J Cardiol 67:243–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mairesse GH, Marwick TH, Melin JA, et al (1995) Use of exercise electrocardiography, tech-netium-99m-MIBI perfusion tomography, and two-dimensional echocardiography for coronary disease surveillance in a low-prevalence population of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 14:222–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohn JM, Wilensky RL, O’Donnell JA, et al (1996) Exercise echocardiography, angiography, and intracoronary ultrasound after cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol 77:1216–1219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Collings CA, Pinto FJ, Valantine HA, et al (1994) Exercise echocardiography in heart transplant recipients: a comparison with angiography and intracoronary ultrasonography. J Heart Lung Transplant 13:604–613

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ciliberto GR, Mangiavacchi M, Banfi F, et al (1993) Coronary artery disease after heart transplantation: non-invasive evaluation with exercise thallium scintigraphy. Eur Heart J 14:226–229

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Klauss V, Mudra H, Uberfuhr P, et al (1995) Intraindividual variability of cardiac allograft vasculopathy as assessed by intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 76:463–466

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. St Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, et al (1992) Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of “angiographically silent” intimai thickening. Circulation 85:979–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pflugfelder PW, Boughner DR, Rudas L, et al (1993) Enhanced detection of cardiac allograft arterial disease with intracoronary ultrasonographic imaging. Am Heart J 125:1583–1591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Picano E, De Pieri G, Salerno JA, et al (1990) Electrocardiographic changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia elicited by dipyridamole infusion in acute rejection early after heart transplantation. Circulation 81:72–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ciliberto GR, Massa D, Mangiavacchi M, et al (1993) High-dose dipyridamole echocardiography test in coronary artery disease after heart transplantation. Eur Heart J 14:48–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Akosah KO, Mohanty PK, Funai JT, et al (1994) Noninvasive detection of transplant coronary artery disease by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 13:1024–1038

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Derumeaux G, Redonnet M, Mouton-Schleifer D, et al (1995) Dobutamine stress echocardiography in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. VACOMED Research Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:1665–1672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Spes CH, Mudra H, Schnaack SD, et al (1996) Dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive diagnosis of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Am J Cardiol 78:168–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spes CH, Klauss V, Rieber J, et al (1999) Functional and morphological findings in heart transplant recipients with a normal coronary angiogram: an analysis by dobutamine stress echocardiography, intracoronary Doppler and intravascular ultrasound. J Heart Lung Transplant 18:391–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Spes CH, Klauss V, Mudra H, et al (1999) Diagnostic and prognostic value of serial dobutamine stress echocardiography for noninvasive assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a comparison with coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 100:509–515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Akosah KO, McDaniel S, Hanrahan JS, et al (1998) Dobutamine stress echocardiography early after heart transplantation predicts development of allograft coronary artery disease and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 31:1607–1614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis JF, Selman SB, Murphy JD, et al (1997) Dobutamine echocardiography for prediction of ischemic events in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 16:390–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Derumeaux G, Redonnet M, Soyer R, et al (1998) Assessment of the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy by dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 17:259–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Larsen RL, Applegate PM, Dyar DA, et al (1998) Dobutamine stress echocardiography for assessing coronary artery disease after transplantation in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:515–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pahl E, Crawford SE, Swenson JM, et al (1999) Dobutamine stress echocardiography: experience in pediatric heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 18:725–732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spes, C.H., Angermann, C.E. (2003). Stress Echocardiography After Cardiac Transplantation. In: Stress Echocardiography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05096-5_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05096-5_33

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-05098-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-05096-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics