Skip to main content

Corporate Reform in Russia and the Former Soviet Union: The First Ten Years

  • Conference paper
Completing Transition: The Main Challenges
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

The break-up of the former Soviet Union (FSU) brought a sea of change in economic organization. Central planning and command structures that had been in place for over seventy years collapsed. In some parts of the former empire, a quasi-centralized control of resource allocation remained the norm, albeit on a much smaller scale and with different goals to serve than the previous socialist state. In many other parts, including Russia, the break-up of the central command structures was seen as the seed for creating a market economy.

The opinions expressed in this paper are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD. This paper has extensively used S. Nestor, Takahiro Yasui, and M-L. Guy, “The Relevance of Corporate Governance to Eurasian Transition Economies,” presented at the first Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable (October 2000). The term former Soviet Union (FSU) includes all the republics of the former U.S.S.R., except for the three Baltic states whose history and politics warrant separate treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Baker and McKenzie (1999), “Doing Business in Kyrgyzstan” (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Bernard, Reinier Kraakman, and Anna Tarassova (2000), “Russian Privatization and Corporate Governance: What Went Wrong?” paper available at http://papers.ssrn.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycko, Maxim, Andrei Schleifer, and Robert Vishny (1995), Privatizing Russia (Boston: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadman, Harry (2000), “Reducing Structural Dominance and Entry Barriers in Russian Industry,” World Bank (mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Scott (2000), “Tender procedure for the purchase of blocks of shares of stock in open joint stock companies,” in Russia/Central Europe Executive Guide, August 15, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan Financial (1999), “Kazakhstan Country Survey,” London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Soto, Hernando (2000), The Mystery of Capital (Bantam Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, Simeon, and Peter Murrell (2000), “The Determinants of Enterprise Restructuring in Transition: an Assessment of the Evidence,” World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) (2000), 1999 Transition Report, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Merritt, and Joseph Heller (1999), “Lessons from Fiascos in Russian Corporate Governance,” paper available at http://papers.ssrn.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, Chrystia (2000), Sale of the Century: Russia’s Wild Ride from Communism to Capitalism (New York: Crown Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, Harry, and Reinier Kraakman (2000), “The Essential Role of Organisational Law,” paper available at http://papers.ssrn.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Ira, Stilpon Nestor, and Raj Desai (1997), Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Global Institute (1999), “Unlocking Economic Growth in Russia,” Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey Investor Opinion Survey (2000), available at www.mckinsey.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monks, Robert A.G. (2001), “The New Global Investors: How Shareowners Can Unlock Sustainable Prosperity World Wide” (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellis, John (1999), “Time to Rethink Privatization in Transition Economies?” in Finance and Development (June 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestor, Stilpon, and Scott Thomas (1995), “Systemic Privatization in East-Central Europe,” in East-Central European Economies in Transition, ed. by John Hard and Richard Caufman (New York: M.E. Sharp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestor, Stilpon (1996), “Insolvency Procedures in Transition Economies,” in Emerging Financial Markets and the Role of International Financial Institutions, ed. by Joseph Norton and Mats Andenas (London: Kulwer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestor, Stilpon (2000), “Legal and Institutional Reform in European Transition Economies,” in Turkey and Central and Eastern Europe in Transition, ed. by Togan Subidey and V.N. Balasubramanyan (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (1991), A Study of the Soviet Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2000), Economic Survey of the Russian Federation, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2001), “Company Law Reform in OECD member-countries” (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistor, Katharina, and Andrew Spicer (1997), “Investment Funds in Mass Privatization and Beyond,” in Between State and Market: Mass Privatization in Transition Economies, ed. by Ira Lieberman, Stilpon Nestor, and Raj Desai, World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pistor, Katharina, Martin Reiser, and Stanislaw Gelfer (2000), “Law and Finance in Transition Economies,” in Economies in Transition, Vol. 8 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Radigyn, Alexander (2000), “Ownership and Control of the Russian Industry,” paper presented at 2000 OECD Roundtable on Corporate Governance, available at www.oecd.org/daf/corporate-affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Sarah (1999), “Introduction,” in Review of Central and Eastern European Law, Vol. 25, 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryvkina, Rozalina (1998), “What Kind of Capitalism is Being Created in Russia,” in Russian Policy and Law, May/June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shkurupiy, Konstantyn (2000), “Corporate Ownership and Control Structure in the Ukraine,” paper presented at the first Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable, available at www.oecd.org/daf/corporate-affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph (1999), “Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?: Corporate Governance Failures in the Transition,” paper presented at the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2000), “Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan: a Tale of Two Transition Paths,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2472.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nestor, S. (2002). Corporate Reform in Russia and the Former Soviet Union: The First Ten Years. In: Tumpel-Gugerell, G., Wolfe, L., Mooslechner, P. (eds) Completing Transition: The Main Challenges. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04866-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04866-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07676-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04866-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics