Skip to main content

Comment on Professor David Hunter’s Talk

  • Chapter
Rationing in Medicine

Part of the book series: Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung ((ETHICSSCI,volume 13))

  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

Professor Hunter has presented his expert endeavour of “reviewing the debate and reality in Britain” (p 35) with regard to medical rationing. Hence, we have been provided with three different levels of data or theses to think about:

  1. 1.

    the level of de facto decision-making upon the provision and non-provision of potentially benefitting care to patients;

  2. 2.

    the level of British reflection thereupon — be it by politicians, by the public, or by academic experts of various backgrounds;

  3. 3.

    the level of Professor Hunter’s own theoretical inferences not the least from those very realities and debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaron HJ, Schwartz WB (1984) The painful prescription: rationing hospital care. The Brookings Institution, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bericht: Britischer Ärztetag: Gesundheitspolitisches Stimmungstief (1999) Deutsches Ärzteblatt 96: S. B 1569–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels N et al. (1996) Benchmarks of Fairness for Health care Reform. OUP, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schöne-Seifert, B. (2002). Comment on Professor David Hunter’s Talk. In: Breyer, F., Kliemt, H., Thiele, F., Wütscher, F. (eds) Rationing in Medicine. Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung, vol 13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04798-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04798-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07670-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04798-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics