Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Input-Output Systems in Regional and Interregional CGE Modeling

  • Chapter
Book cover Trade, Networks and Hierarchies

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

As models used in economic analysis become more and more complex, issues of reliability, tractability and analytical importance take on a greater role in the allocation of resources for model construction and updating. In this chapter, attention is directed to the role of input-output tables in broader, economy-wide models; while a number of papers have addressed this issue, the approaches have varied, in large part due to different motivations in the use or applications of the economy-wide models. Essentially, there are two types of issues that need to be addressed. The first is related to the source of the input-output data; how important is the quality of the input-output data that are to be incorporated into the economy-wide model? The second issue refers to the way the input-output structure is specified in the model, i.e., the functional form for the production system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Batten, D. 1982. “The International Linkages Between National And Regional Input-Output Models.” International Regional Science Review, 7, 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, R.S. 1990. “The Washington Projection and Simulation Model: ten years of experience with a regional interindustry econometric model.” International Regional Science Review, 13, 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes, P., D. Olson, and D. Glennon. 1991. “The interindustry employment demand variable: an extension of the I-SAMIS technique for linking input-output and econometric models.” Environment and Planning A, 23, 1063–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Despotakis, K. A. and A.C. Fisher. 1988. “Energy In A Regional Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Model For California.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15, 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, P. B., B.R. Parmenter, J. Sutton, and D.P. Vincent. 1982. ORANI: A Multisectoral Model Of The Australian Economy. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, R.L. 1976. “A short-cut to estimates of regional input-output multipliers: methodology and evaluation.” International Regional Science Review 1, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazel, R. C. 1994. Regional and Interregional Economic Effects of the Free Trade Agreement Between the US and Canada. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazel, R.C., G.J.D. Hewings and M. Sonis. 1996 “Trade, sensitivity and feedbacks: interregional impacts of the US-Canada Free Trade Agreement.” In J.C.J.M. van den Bergh, P. Nijkamp and P. Rietveld, eds. Recent Advances in Spatial Equilibrium Modeling. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guccione, A., W.J. Gillen, P.D. Blair, and R.E. Miller. 1988. “Interregional feedbacks in input-output models: the least upper bound.” Journal of Regional Science 28, 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E.A. 1999. Regional Inequality and Structural Changes: lessons from the Brazilian Experience. Brookfield, VT, Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, E. A. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1997. “The Theoretical Specification of B-MARIA.” Discussion Paper 97-T-5. Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, F., P. McGregor, N. Dourmashkin, K. Swales and Y.P. Yin. 1991. “The sensitivity of output multipliers to alternative technology and factor market assumptions: a computable general equilibrium analysis.” In J.H.L.I. Dewhurst, G.J.D. Hewings, R.C. Jensen, eds. Regional Input-Output Modeling: New Developments and Interpretations. Aldershot, Avebury. pp. 210–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, F.J. 1982. “The estimation of input-output type output multipliers when no input-output model exists: a comment.” Journal of Regional Science 22, 375–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G.J.D. 1977. “Evaluating the possibilities for exchanging regional input-output coefficients.” Environment and Planning A, 9, 927–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G.J.D. 1984. “The role of prior information in updating regional input-output models.” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 18, 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewings, G.J.D., and R.C. Jensen. 1986. “Regional, interregional and multiregional input-output analysis.” In P. Nijkamp and E.S. Mills, eds. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. Amsterdam, North-Holland. pp. 295–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, E.A., and D.W. Jorgenson. 1974. “US energy policy and economic growth: 1975–2000.” Bell Journal of Economics, 5, 461–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulu, E. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1993. “The development and use of interregional input-output models for Indonesia under conditions of limited information.” Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies, 5, 135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R. 1991. “The construction of input-output coefficients with flexible functional forms.” In J.H.L.I. Dewhurst, G.J.D. Hewings, R.C. Jensen, eds. Regional Input-Output Modeling: New Developments and Interpretations. Aldershot, Avebury. pp. 98–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R. (1998) “Frame Shifting in Regional General Equilibrium Models,” Discussion Paper 98-T-6, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana. [Chapter 21 in this volume is a modified version of this paper].

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich P.R., and R. Mahidhara. 1991. “Hog butchers no longer: 20 years of employment change in metropolitan Chicago.” Economic Perspectives (Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago) 15, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R., G.J.D. Hewings, G.R. Schindler and R. Mahidhara. 1996. “The choice of input-output table embedded in regional econometric input-output models.” Papers in Regional Science, 75, 103–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israilevich, P.R., G.J.D. Hewings, M. Sonis, and G.R. Schindler. 1997. “Forecasting Structural Change with a Regional Econometric Input-Output Model.” Journal of Regional Science, 37, 565–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R.C. 1980. “The concept of accuracy in input-output.” International Regional Science Review, 5, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz J.L., and R.L. Burford. 1985. “Shortcut formulas for output, income and employment multipliers.” The Annals of Regional Science, 19, 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko, S. 1985. A Regional Computable General Equilibrium Model For Korea. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, Y., D.F. Schreiner and H. Shin, H. 1993. “Comparisons Of Regional Fixed Price And General Equilibrium Models.” Regional Science Perspectives, 23, 33–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraybill, D.S. 1991. “Multiregional computable general equilibrium models: an introduction and survey.” Unpublished paper, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. and A. Strout. 1963. “Multiregional Input-Output Analysis.” In T. Barna, ed. Structural Interdependence and Economic Development. London, MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, P.G., J.K. Swales, and Y.P. Yin. 1995. “Input-output analysis, labour scarcity and relative price endogeneity: aggregate demand disturbances in a flex-price Leontief system.” Economic Systems Research, 7, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, P.G., J.K. Swales, and Y.P. Yin. 1999. “Spillover and Feedback Effects in General Equilibrium Interregional Models of the National Economy: A Requiem for Interregional Input-Output?” In G.J.D. Hewings, M. Sonis, M. Madden and Y. Kimura eds. Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R.E. 1986. Upper bounds on the sizes of interregional feedbacks in multiregional input-output models. Journal of Regional Science 26, 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, F. and M.W. Peter. 1996. “A Multiregional, Multisectoral Model of The Australian Economy With An Illustrative Application.” Australian Economic Papers, 35, 94–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, M.W. 1997. “Notes on comparative Static closures for MONASH-MRF.” Unpublished paper, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, M.W., S.H. Han, G.A. Meagher, and F. Naqvi. 1996a. “The Database Of MONASH-MRF”. Mimeo, IMPACT Project, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phibbs P.J., and A.J. Holsman. 1981. “An evaluation of the Burford and Katz short cut technique for deriving input-output multipliers.” The Annals of Regional Science, 15, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanoff, E., and S.H. Levine. 1986. “Capacity limitations, inventory and time-phased production in the sequential interindustry model.” Papers of the Regional Science Association, 59, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Round, J.I. 1978. “An interregional input-output approach to the evaluation of nonsurvey methods.” Journal of Regional Science, 18, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Round, J.I. 1983. “Nonsurvey techniques: a critical review of the theory and the evidence.” International Regional Science Review, 8, 189–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoven, J. B. and J. Whalley. 1984. “Applied General-Equilibrium Models Of Taxation And International Trade: An Introduction And Survey” Journal of Economic Literature, 22, 1007–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., and G.J.D. Hewings. 1989. “Error and sensitivity input-output analysis: a new approach.” In R.E. Miller, K.R. Polenske, A.Z. Rose, eds. Frontiers of Input-Output Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press. pp. 232–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., and G.J.D. Hewings. 1992. “Coefficient change in input-output models: theory and applications.” Economic Systems Research, 4, 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, B.H., and G.A. Trainer. 1976. “The generation of errors in regional input-output impact models.” Working Paper. Regional Science Research Institute, Peace Dale, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takayama, A. 1985. Mathematical Economics. Cambridge, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treyz, G.I. 1993. Regional Economic Modeling. Boston, Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treyz, G.I., and B.H. Stevens. 1985. “The TFS Modeling Methodology.” Regional Studies, 19, 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FIPE, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil

    Eduardo A. Haddad

  2. Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, USA

    Eduardo A. Haddad & Geoffrey J. D. Hewings

  3. Centre of Policy Studies and Impact Project, Monash University, Australia

    Matthew Peter

Authors
  1. Eduardo A. Haddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Geoffrey J. D. Hewings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew Peter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, 607 S. Mathews, Urbana, IL, 61801-3671, USA

    Geoffrey J. D. Hewings

  2. Department of Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, Bar Ilan University, 52900, Ramat-Gan, Israel

    Michael Sonis

  3. Department of Civil and Materials Engineering, Transport Laboratory (TransLab), University of Illinois at Chicago, 842 W. Taylor Street (M/C 246), Chicago, IL, 60607-7023, USA

    David Boyce

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haddad, E.A., Hewings, G.J.D., Peter, M. (2002). Input-Output Systems in Regional and Interregional CGE Modeling. In: Hewings, G.J.D., Sonis, M., Boyce, D. (eds) Trade, Networks and Hierarchies. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04786-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04786-6_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07712-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04786-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation