Miyazawa-Sraffa-Leontief Income Distribution Models

  • Yoshio Kimura
  • Michael Sonis
  • Geoffrey J. D. Hewings
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


This chapter extends several of the contributions in Hewings et al., (1999) that attempted to explore intersections between the work of Miyazawa and several other familiar theoretical and modeling paradigms. In the present case, the extensions link the work of Sraffa, Leontief and Miyazawa to explore the ways in which a more extensive framework can yield new insights into economic structure. The contributions of Sraffa (1960) to the understanding of economic structure have been significantly advanced in recent years by the interpretative assessments of Steenge (1995, 1997). In section 20.2, the standard Sraffian model is presented and some of the initial modifications are outlined. Following this exposition, section 20.3 provides a complement with some additional modifications that attempt to simplify the presentation of the new Sraffa-Leontief system (Sonis and Hewings, 2000), focusing on two alternative matrix decompositions. The conditions of solvability of this model are elaborated in detail in section 20.4. Section 20.5 revisits the Miyazawa income distribution model and establishes the foundation for the presentation of the Miyazawa-Sraffa-Leontief income distribution model in section 20.6. Attention is also directed here to solvability. The penultimate section addresses the role of profits, wages and consumption in this integrated system. The chapter concludes with some brief summary remarks and suggestions for further extensions.


Income Distribution Equilibrium Price Final Demand Unit Production Cost Leontief Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ara, K. 1975. “Parable and Realism in the Theory of Capital: A Generalization of Prof. Samuelson’s Theory of Surrogate Production Function.” The Economic Studies Quarterly (presently, The Japanese Economic Review), 26, 1–13.Google Scholar
  2. Hewings, G.J.D., M. Sonis, M. Madden and Y. Kimura, eds. 1999. Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure. Advances in Spatial Sciences, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Horn, R.A. and C.A. Johnson. 1985. Matrix Analysis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Israilevich, P.R., G.J.D Hewings, M. Sonis and G. R. Schindler. 1997. “Forecasting structural change with a regional econometric input-output model.” Journal of Regional Science, 37, 565–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kurz, H.D. and N. Salvadori. 1995. Theory of Production: A Long Period Analysis. Cambridge, University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. McKenzie, L.W. 1960. “Matrix with Dominant Diagonals and Economic Theory.” In K.J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppe, eds. Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences. Palo Alto, CA., Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Miyazawa, K. 1960. “Foreign trade multiplier, input-output analysis and the consumption function.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Miyazawa, K. 1968. “Input-output analysis and interrelational multiplier as a matrix.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 7, 39–58.Google Scholar
  9. Miyazawa, K. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Murray, K.C. and Y. Kimura. 1978. Introduction to Mathematical Economics. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Pasinetti, L.L. 1977. Lectures on the Theory of Production. New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Sonis, M. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1992. “Coefficient change in input-output models: theory and applications.” Economic Systems Research, 4, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sonis, M., G.J.D. Hewings and K. Miyazawa. 1997. “Synergetic interactions within pair-wise hierarchy of economic linkages sub-systems.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 38, 183–199.Google Scholar
  14. Sonis, M. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1999a. “Miyazawa’s Contributions to Understanding Economic Structure: Interpretation, Evaluation and Extensions.” In G.J.D. Hewings, M. Sonis, M. Madden and Y. Kimura, eds. Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure. Advances in Spatial Sciences, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Sonis, M. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1999b. “Economic landscapes: multiplier product matrix analysis for multiregional input-output systems.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 40, 59–74.Google Scholar
  16. Sonis, M. and G.J.D. Hewings. 2000. “On the Sraffa-Leontief Model.” Discussion Paper 00-T-2. Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
  17. Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Steenge, A.E. (1995) “Sraffa and Goodwin: a unifying framework for standards of value in the income distribution problem.” Journal of Economics, 62, 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steenge, A.E. 1997. “The elusive standard commodity: eigenvectors as standards of value.” In A. Simonovits and A. E. Steenge, eds. Prices, Growth and Cycles: Essays in Honor of Andreas Brody. London, Macmillan Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshio Kimura
    • 1
  • Michael Sonis
    • 2
    • 3
  • Geoffrey J. D. Hewings
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and InformationGifu Shoutoku Gakuen UniversityGifuJapan
  2. 2.Department of GeographyBar Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael
  3. 3.Regional Economics Applications LaboratoryUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations