Skip to main content
  • 254 Accesses

Abstract

The AVM is regarded as:

  • Small if the greatest diameter of the nidus is < 3 cm (radius < 1.5 cm, volume < 14 cm3). (This is already “large” for radiosurgery.)

  • Medium if the greatest diameter of the lesion is between 3–6 cm (radius 1.5–3 cm, volume 15–102 cm3).

  • Large, if the AVM diameter is 6 > cm (>102 cm3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference and Acknowledgement

  • Spetzler RF, Martin NA (1986) A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 65: 476–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Maitz A (1997) Analysis of neurological sequelae from radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformation. How location affects outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 40: 273–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Pollock BE, Maitz A, Lunsford LD (1997) Complications from arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery: multivariate analysis and risk modelling. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38: 485–490

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spetzler RF, Martin NA (1986) A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 65: 476–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voges J, Treuer H, Sturm V, Buchner C, Lehrke R, Kocher M, Staar S, Kuchta J, Müller RP (1996) Risk analysis of linear accelerator radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36: 1055–1063

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner DJ, Martell MK, Hall EJ (1991) Fractionated regimes for stereotactic radiotherapy of recurrent tumours in the brain. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21: 819–824

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall EJ, Brenner DJ (1993) The radiobiology of radiosurgery: rationale for different treatment regimes for Avms and malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25: 381–385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DTL, Schreuder AN, Symons JE Rüther, Van der Vlugt G, Bennett KF, Yates ADB (1995) Use of stereophotogrammetry in proton radiation therapy. Proceedings FIG Commission, 6th International FIG Symposium, February, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breuer, H., Smit, B.J. (2000). Appendix. In: Proton Therapy and Radiosurgery. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04301-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04301-1_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08379-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04301-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics