Karl Popper’s Critique of Historicism, the Historical School, and the Contemporary Debate

  • Adam J. Chmielewski
Part of the Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy book series (SEEP)


Popper’s name is usually associated with the idea of open society and the deductive hypothetical method. Now, barely three years have passed since Sir Karl’s death, it looks as though the memory about both of these concepts, as well as Popper’s name itself, are almost equally dead. Popper’s philosophy of science as well as his social philosophy are commonly considered things of the past. Such a judgement, though harsh to Popper and his philosophy, does not seem to bother too many Western philosophers, always very sceptical of Popper’s philosophy, and of his own robust self, anyway. What is far more interesting is that similar attitude has been adopted by intellectuals in Central and Eastern Europe, who, apparently at least, have had most reasons to follow his teaching.


Open Society Social Engineering Social Philosophy Contemporary Debate Methodological Individualism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 2.
    Quoted after George Soros: The Capitalist Threat, The Atlantic Monthly, February (1997), p. 2.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Cf. John Watkins: Karl Popper. Memoir, The American Scholar, Spring (1997), pp. 205–219. Quotation is from p. 213. Ideas very much similar to Watkins’s are suggested by a reading of Ernst Gombrich’s The Open Society and Its Enemies: Remembering Its Publication Fifty Years Ago, LSE, London 1995.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Karl R. Popper: The Poverty of Historicism, Economica vol. XI, nos 42 and 43, 1944, and vol. XII, no. 46, 1945. The book was published by Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, in 1957.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Karl R. Popper: Conjectures and Refutations, London (Routledge and Kegan Paul) 1963, especially papers What is Dialectic?; Prediction and Prophecy in the Social Sciences; Utopia and Violence, and The History of Our Time: An Optimist View.Google Scholar
  5. 21.
    Popper: Objective Knowledge, Oxford (Oxford University Press) 1972, p. 188.Google Scholar
  6. 23.
    Jerzy Giedymin: Model historycyzmu prof. K. Poppera, Studia Filozoficzne 1958, 3, pp. 205–214 (in Polish).Google Scholar
  7. 24.
    Peter Winch: The Idea of A Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy, London (Routledge and Kegan Paul) 1958, pp. 127–128.Google Scholar
  8. 25.
    Walter Kaufmann: The Hegel Myth and Its Method, in: Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays, edited by Alasdair Maclntyre, Notre Dame-London (Notre Dame Press) 1976, pp. 42–43.Google Scholar
  9. 26.
    Gilbert Ryle: A review of Karl Popper’s Open Society and Its Enemies, in: Mind, vol. 56, No. 222, April 1947, p. 171.Google Scholar
  10. 27.
    Maurice Cornforth: The Open Philosophy and the Open Society, London (Lawrence and Wishart) 1968, p. 29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam J. Chmielewski

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations