Advertisement

An Interindustry Analysis of the Relationship Between Marx and Keynes

  • Andrew B. Trigg
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Miyazawa’s Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution (1976) draws upon two main economic traditions. In the first place it represents a development of Keynesian multiplier analysis. The aggregate relationship that Keynes (1936) specified between income and final demand is expanded to include interactions between different industrial sectors and income groups. Secondly, its focus on the distribution of income can be placed in the Marxian tradition. Miyazawa develops a multiplier framework in which a clear distinction is made between the expenditure patterns of workers and capitalists.

Keywords

Capitalist Consumption Final Demand Labor Time Effective Demand Labor Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dillard, D. 1984. “Keynes and Marx: a centennial appraisal.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 6, 421–432.Google Scholar
  2. Kenway, P. 1980. “Marx, Keynes and the possibility of crisis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 4, 23–36.Google Scholar
  3. Keynes, J.M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Keynes, J.M. 1979. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. London/Cambridge, Macmillan/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Marx, K. 1867. Capital. Vol. I. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Miyazawa, K. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Morishima, M. 1973. Marx’s Economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Olgin, D.S. 1992. “On an accidental proof of the ‘Fundamental Mandan Theorem.’” History of Political Economy 24, 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosenthal, J. 1993. “Value and consumption: prolegomena to the theory of crisis.” Capital and Class 51, 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Trigg, A.B. 1987. “The spatial and distributional impacts of public expenditure programmes: a social accounts approach.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 61, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Trigg, A.B. and Madden, M. 1990. “The partition and decomposition of extended input-output multipliers.” In L. Anselin and M. Madden eds. New Directions in Regional Analysis. London, Belhaven.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew B. Trigg
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations